Got letter today from Sprint

"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
<snipped>
>
> Do you work for Sprint, Bob? You sure do apologize for them quite
alot.
> Maybe you and Rob are special friends.

As stated more than a few times ... millions maybe, I do not work in
the telecommunications industry ... As to apologizing for SPCS, show
me a post Justin. Come on, if you are accusing me of that, surely you
have something to back up your statement.

As to Rob, I've never met him, and no ... we are not friends. Current
posters here ... Yes.

Bob::Thinking Justin just likes to post to see his name in this
newsgroup::

---

› See More: Got letter today from Sprint

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]=20
says...
> They released enough details for a moron like you to discuss it. You're =
an
> apologist, downplaying a screw up by Sprint. Don't defend the letters,
> they're NOT harmless.
>=20

Discuss what? How our IVR fared? Don't know. JD Power won't say. =20
Problem resolution? Don't know. JD Power won't say. Hold time? Don't=20
know. JD Power won't say how we did. Or how *anyone* did on any=20
particular criterion.

Some "details."

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]=20
says...
> Then answer simple questions, discuss the topics, and everyone's happy. =
But
> that's out of your ability range.
>=20

Done several times, and I've given you links to them, too, and here you=20
sit lying about them.

Typical.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]=20
says...
> Well, don't call a letter harmless when it's not.
>=20
> 1) It wastes customers' time and reduces their faith that the billing
> department will get something right.

In the end, it *is* harmless. A stupid mistake, but a harmless one.

> 2) It costs postage for Sprint, which they'll pass on to the customer.

LOLOL, you're funny, Justin. Vapid, but funny.

> 3) It brings out asses like you who feed everyone horse pockey on how it'=
s
> harmless, which is more of an insult than reading the letter in the first
> place.

Look at the inane kind of stuff you have to post in order to show=20
"harm," Justin. Do you really not see how disjointed that is?

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.com> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
>
> >
> > master vargas keeps ignoring
> >
> > + If you're on Vision trial, that ownt be on the web.
>
> Nope. If you've signed up for a Vision Pack, even during the free
> trial, it's displayed in the "My Plan" description.

It doesn't on mine. Am I the only one of 16 million Sprint Customers
with this problem, or is vargie making it up as usual.

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:43:49 +0000, P Reality wrote:

>> Nope. If you've signed up for a Vision Pack, even during the free
>> trial, it's displayed in the "My Plan" description.
>
> It doesn't on mine. Am I the only one of 16 million Sprint Customers
> with this problem, or is vargie making it up as usual.

I had the Vision Pack trial, and it **was** listed under 'My Plan'.

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> <snipped>
> >
> > Do you work for Sprint, Bob? You sure do apologize for them quite
> alot.
> > Maybe you and Rob are special friends.
>
> As stated more than a few times ... millions maybe, I do not work in
> the telecommunications industry ... As to apologizing for SPCS, show
> me a post Justin. Come on, if you are accusing me of that, surely you
> have something to back up your statement.
>
> As to Rob, I've never met him, and no ... we are not friends. Current
> posters here ... Yes.
>
> Bob::Thinking Justin just likes to post to see his name in this
> newsgroup::


Yeah, that's it, Bob. I'm famous now. What I like to see is someone who
calls people liars back up their accusations. Like Rob wouldn't do.
Nothing wrong in defending yourself when someone calls you a liar. But it's
hard to do when they won't back up their accusations.

"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

<snipped>
> Yeah, that's it, Bob. I'm famous now. What I like to see is
someone who
> calls people liars back up their accusations. Like Rob wouldn't do.
> Nothing wrong in defending yourself when someone calls you a liar.
But it's
> hard to do when they won't back up their accusations.

Sweet Jesus I'm sick and tired of your whining here ...! I'm not going
to kill filter you, but I am going to mark all your current unread and
future posts as read ...

Bob

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> <snipped>
> > Yeah, that's it, Bob. I'm famous now. What I like to see is
> someone who
> > calls people liars back up their accusations. Like Rob wouldn't do.
> > Nothing wrong in defending yourself when someone calls you a liar.
> But it's
> > hard to do when they won't back up their accusations.
>
> Sweet Jesus I'm sick and tired of your whining here ...! I'm not going
> to kill filter you, but I am going to mark all your current unread and
> future posts as read ...
>
> Bob


And I'm sick and tired of your double standards.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> > "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > <snipped>
> > > Yeah, that's it, Bob. I'm famous now. What I like to see is
> > someone who
> > > calls people liars back up their accusations. Like Rob wouldn't do.
> > > Nothing wrong in defending yourself when someone calls you a liar.
> > But it's
> > > hard to do when they won't back up their accusations.
> >
> > Sweet Jesus I'm sick and tired of your whining here ...! I'm not going
> > to kill filter you, but I am going to mark all your current unread and
> > future posts as read ...
> >
> > Bob
>
>
> And I'm sick and tired of your double standards.


I got Schmidt KILL filed, is he excusing SprintPCS for scaring folks
with that Vision letter?

"P Reality" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > <snipped>
> > > > Yeah, that's it, Bob. I'm famous now. What I like to see is
> > > someone who
> > > > calls people liars back up their accusations. Like Rob wouldn't do.
> > > > Nothing wrong in defending yourself when someone calls you a liar.
> > > But it's
> > > > hard to do when they won't back up their accusations.
> > >
> > > Sweet Jesus I'm sick and tired of your whining here ...! I'm not going
> > > to kill filter you, but I am going to mark all your current unread and
> > > future posts as read ...
> > >
> > > Bob
> >
> >
> > And I'm sick and tired of your double standards.
>
>
> I got Schmidt KILL filed, is he excusing SprintPCS for scaring folks
> with that Vision letter?

That and he's still whining about my two complaint posts and defending his
and Rob's double standards.

"P Reality" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > <snipped>
> > > > Yeah, that's it, Bob. I'm famous now. What I like to see is
> > > someone who
> > > > calls people liars back up their accusations. Like Rob
wouldn't do.
> > > > Nothing wrong in defending yourself when someone calls you a
liar.
> > > But it's
> > > > hard to do when they won't back up their accusations.
> > >
> > > Sweet Jesus I'm sick and tired of your whining here ...! I'm not
going
> > > to kill filter you, but I am going to mark all your current
unread and
> > > future posts as read ...
> > >
> > > Bob
> >
> >
> > And I'm sick and tired of your double standards.
>
>
> I got Schmidt KILL filed, is he excusing SprintPCS for scaring folks
> with that Vision letter?

I haven't said one thing about that letter Phillippe ... err ...
Richard ... err ... P Reality. So, tell me ... why the need to change
your ID here not once, but twice? You still haven't answered that ...

Bob

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> I haven't said one thing about that letter Phillippe ... err ...
> Richard ... err ... P Reality. So, tell me ... why the need to change
> your ID here not once, but twice? You still haven't answered that ...
>
> Bob
>
>

He has changed the email more times than that. I have found that the filter
criteria needed to be more complex ...

Tom Veldhouse

In article <[email protected]>,
C Roth <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:43:49 +0000, P Reality wrote:
>
> >> Nope. If you've signed up for a Vision Pack, even during the free
> >> trial, it's displayed in the "My Plan" description.
> >
> > It doesn't on mine. Am I the only one of 16 million Sprint Customers
> > with this problem, or is vargie making it up as usual.
>
> I had the Vision Pack trial, and it **was** listed under 'My Plan'.

So what's the deal? It shows for some, and not others?

O/Siris <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.com> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> says...
> > Well, don't call a letter harmless when it's not.
> >
> > 1) It wastes customers' time and reduces their faith that the billing
> > department will get something right.
>
> In the end, it *is* harmless. A stupid mistake, but a harmless one.
>
> > 2) It costs postage for Sprint, which they'll pass on to the customer.
>
> LOLOL, you're funny, Justin. Vapid, but funny.
>
> > 3) It brings out asses like you who feed everyone horse pockey on how it'
> s
> > harmless, which is more of an insult than reading the letter in the first
> > place.
>
> Look at the inane kind of stuff you have to post in order to show
> "harm," Justin. Do you really not see how disjointed that is?


I have found both Phillipe or whatever he choses to call himself and
Justin to both STRETCH the truth at least by omission. I have found
the same type of mailings by AT&T, Cingular, and Phillipe's favorite,
the PERFECT Verizon. I don't find any postings by either regarding
those companies, but then that would take the wind out of their
arguments. As for JD Powers, any survey is suspect when the findings
and the method of determining them is kept secret. I would dispute
ANY survey under those conditions. Also, JP Powers is compensated by
the company they rate #1 (if you don't believe me, study up on JD
Powers!). I am an analyst and deal with numbers and statistics all
day long and I know it is all in how you "spin" the numbers. I wait
for Phillipe (real name?) and Justin to post something to show they
are balanced in what they post instead of just "Venting" (since I
really haven't seen any yet and have been surfing for sometime).