Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 76 to 82 of 82
  1. #76
    Justin
    Guest

    Re: Got letter today from Sprint


    "Ric" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message

    news:<[email protected]>...
    > > "Ric" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]
    > > > O/Siris <[email protected]ntpcs.com> wrote in message

    > > news:<[email protected]>...
    > > > > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
    > > > > says...
    > > > > > Well, don't call a letter harmless when it's not.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > 1) It wastes customers' time and reduces their faith that the

    billing
    > > > > > department will get something right.
    > > > >
    > > > > In the end, it *is* harmless. A stupid mistake, but a harmless one.
    > > > >
    > > > > > 2) It costs postage for Sprint, which they'll pass on to the

    customer.
    > > > >
    > > > > LOLOL, you're funny, Justin. Vapid, but funny.
    > > > >
    > > > > > 3) It brings out asses like you who feed everyone horse pockey on

    how
    > > it'
    > > s
    > > > > > harmless, which is more of an insult than reading the letter in

    the
    > > first
    > > > > > place.
    > > > >
    > > > > Look at the inane kind of stuff you have to post in order to show
    > > > > "harm," Justin. Do you really not see how disjointed that is?
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > I have found both Phillipe or whatever he choses to call himself and
    > > > Justin to both STRETCH the truth at least by omission.

    > >
    > > It's also exagerating to say that the letter caused NO harm. It may not

    be
    > > a direct monetary harm or cost.
    > > I've had cell service with three different companies over the past six
    > > years. I was never signed up for something I didn't ask for until

    Sprint.
    > NEVER? I doubt that. You just don't want to admit because it would
    > invalidate your arguments.
    > >
    > > > I have found
    > > > the same type of mailings by AT&T, Cingular, and Phillipe's favorite,
    > > > the PERFECT Verizon. I don't find any postings by either regarding
    > > > those companies, but then that would take the wind out of their
    > > > arguments.

    > >
    > > How can we be guilty of stretching something by ommission when that

    hasn't
    > > happened to us?

    > Since I have found postings by both of you in the other groups and
    > mentioning the other companies then you ARE omitting what YOU have
    > already posted in other forums. Be careful. If you post it somewhere
    > someone will see it. Then if you contradict yourself, as you just did,
    > then YOU are lying, as you like to accuse others of doing (but you,
    > oh, NEVER).
    > >
    > >
    > > > As for JD Powers, any survey is suspect when the findings
    > > > and the method of determining them is kept secret. I would dispute
    > > > ANY survey under those conditions. Also, JP Powers is compensated by
    > > > the company they rate #1 (if you don't believe me, study up on JD
    > > > Powers!). I am an analyst and deal with numbers and statistics all
    > > > day long and I know it is all in how you "spin" the numbers. I wait
    > > > for Phillipe (real name?) and Justin to post something to show they
    > > > are balanced in what they post instead of just "Venting" (since I
    > > > really haven't seen any yet and have been surfing for sometime).

    > >
    > > And your link is WHERE? Thanks for playing.

    > You and Phil brought up JD Powers WITHOUT a link, so since you brought
    > it up first, shouldn't you be able to provide (which YOU DIDN'T). If
    > you want to PLAY, then make sure you have YOUR bases covered. I have
    > yet to see either you or PHIL (or whatever lurking name he choses to
    > use currently) post the link to JD Powers and their survey. Once you
    > do I will be more than happy to supply you with mine (which anyone can
    > easily find this information on the company, if you know how to
    > research companies). >



    Looks like you don't know how to read all the threads on a topic before you
    post your drivel.





    See More: Got letter today from Sprint




  2. #77
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Got letter today from Sprint

    In article <[email protected]>,=20
    [email protected] says...
    > An article
    > which DID NOT give any other reason than that was what was available for =

    use
    > in the US.
    >=20


    Nope. It also listed 1900MHz as providing a possible avenue for high-
    speed, 3rd generation data services. That's just one example.

    --=20
    -+-
    R=D8=DF
    O/Siris
    I work for SprintPCS
    I *don't* speak for them.



  3. #78
    Justin
    Guest

    Re: Got letter today from Sprint


    "O/Siris" <[email protected]ntpcs.cm> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...
    > You STILL have not discussed
    > this topic.
    >


    Several tries in that one thread, Justin. Instead you refused to read
    the link provided.

    --
    -+-
    R
    O/Siris
    I work for SprintPCS
    I *don't* speak for them.


    Yet another BUILL**** lie from you. Post the links to the exact posts where
    you listed the reasons. You can't, because you're lying out your ass. For
    the FIFTH time, you posted a link to a story and then said "Nextel's CEO
    said there was", OVER and OVER.

    List them now. Right now. Prove me wrong. Prove that you can discuss the
    freaking topic. But you can't. You've proven that in the ATTWS forum and
    this forum. SprintPCS Tech discussed it nicely yesterday. You can't even
    do that.

    You barged in, insulted me, backtracked, then refused to either discuss the
    topic. Don't make me reprint the posts to prove this, Rob, because I will.

    Yet you can't post a link to ONE post where you listed the reasons(PL).






  4. #79
    Justin
    Guest

    Re: Got letter today from Sprint


    "O/Siris" <robjvarga[email protected]ntpcs.cm> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...
    > An article
    > which DID NOT give any other reason than that was what was available for

    use
    > in the US.
    >


    Nope. It also listed 1900MHz as providing a possible avenue for high-
    speed, 3rd generation data services. That's just one example.

    --
    -+-
    R
    O/Siris
    I work for SprintPCS
    I *don't* speak for them.


    Wow, you actually listed a reason. Good job, Rob. See, you're almost
    discussing it now. But, I'd have to point out, that is a function of
    transmission technology, not frequency.





  5. #80
    P.
    Guest

    Re: Got letter today from Sprint

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] (Ric) wrote:

    > PHil_Real <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:<[email protected]>...
    > > In article <[email protected]>,
    > > [email protected] (Ric) wrote:
    > >
    > > > Also, JP Powers is compensated by
    > > > the company they rate #1 (if you don't believe me, study up on JD
    > > > Powers!).

    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > So why is Sprint #6 then and not number 2??

    > Many factors feed into this. But you might have to do research to
    > know them



    no, one factor. Its customers are pissed at the absymal customer service.

    SPIN SPIN SPIN if you want, but Sprint Customer Service rates last.



  6. #81
    P.
    Guest

    Re: Got letter today from Sprint

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] (Ric) wrote:

    > When was the study done?


    The JD Power study was released August 28, one week after the Sprint
    apologists here insisted Sprints' customer service was improving.



  7. #82
    Ric
    Guest

    Re: Got letter today from Sprint

    "P." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > [email protected] (Ric) wrote:
    >
    > > I agree the letter causes
    > > confusion and can be in certain instances be harmful to the customer

    >
    > Rob doesn't
    >
    > I rest my case.


    But you forgot to underline my "certain instances" meaning some, not
    all, as you have continously implied. If you had also included the
    part of the many it helped you might have been able to rest your case,
    but you can't since all you do is take out of context. I covered both
    positive and negative impacts, while you only chose negatives to back
    up your "arguments", not even acknowledging the other sides. When you
    decide to use 1 (*****ed one, meaning no others) id then maybe you
    might be able to actually win a debate (or argument as you are more
    inclined to to) someday.



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456