Contradictory Information posted by SprintPCS employees

"Phill." <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> O/Siris <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote:
>
> > In article < P%[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] says...
> > > O/Siris . wrote:
> > > >
> > > > $15/month for a Palm, $30/month for a Pocket PC. Just like we say on
> > > > our web site:
> > >
> > > Just curious. Why should service for a Pocket PC be twice as expensive
> > > as a Palm? Some sort of anti-Microsoft bias?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > All I've got is speculation. They've refused to release why, and I've
> > asked twice.
> >
> > Basically, the PocketPC has the ability to view "pure" HTML web sites.
> > Although it lacks many features, it is, in function anyway, far above a
> > phone or even a Palm (the way we release them, anyway), in ability to
> > pull and utilize data from the Web/Internet.
> >
> > More capacity, more cost, I guess.
>
> Since with a Pocket PC, it's easier (Palm requires extra software) to
> utilize Microsoft Office files, the liklihood of transferring files
> around in many ways a typical Palm user wouldn't could account for it.

Most definitely that, too.

--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

[posted via phonescoop.com]

---

› See More: Contradictory Information posted by SprintPCS employees

Wouldn't know that, don't have an n400 anymore, my father has it in
Reston, VA.. But thanks for that tip.. I will have him try out the SW
update to see if it help his reception any.
--
Statements made by me are of my opinion and knowledge, and do not
express those by Verizon Wireless(R).
Any information I give is subject to change without notice, and may not
be completely accurate.


"Phill." <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (VZW Guy) wrote:
>
> >
> > Your exactly right Hatoncat..
> >
> > And this is directed for everyone.. In my EXPERIENCE with both brands of
> > phone, My OPINION is that Sprint PCS Sanyo phones recieve better
> > reception than most Sprint PCS Samsung phones.. Especially when a Sanyo
> > phone is compared to a Samsung N-400.. LOL I don't know how they fair
> > against other carriers Samsung phones, but it hard to tell anyways becus
> > of it being different carries, they have areas covered differently.
>
> Another example of different answers by different Sprint employees.
> Others say with the WD12 firmware update the N400 is great.

[posted via phonescoop.com]