Results 1 to 15 of 39
- 09-30-2003, 02:34 PM #1Guest
If true the implications for the 2.1 GHz band are not good...
http://tinyurl.com/p873
› See More: Eur: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
- 09-30-2003, 07:44 PM #2HopperGuest
Re: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
X-No-Archive:Yes
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> If true the implications for the 2.1 GHz band are not good...
>
> http://tinyurl.com/p873
The thing that pisses me off about news stories of this kind are the
complete lack of reference to any information about the study, short it
involving the Netherlands.
Where was this report published? Where can a person find the original
report? What was the title?
There's just too many questions. Like what sampling did they do? What level
of significance? What was the test method? These can only be answered by the
original report, not halfassed Reuters reporting.
Hopper
- 09-30-2003, 07:47 PM #3Al KleinGuest
Re: Eur: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:34:23 -0500, [email protected] posted in
alt.cellular.verizon:
>If true the implications for the 2.1 GHz band are not good...
>http://tinyurl.com/p873
1) GSM is pulsed. That may have an effect that non-pulsed modes may
not have.
2) Most people never come close enough to an antenna to receive much
radiation from a base station.
- 09-30-2003, 09:07 PM #4WhytoiGuest
Re: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
In article <Mjqeb.640414$YN5.490491@sccrnsc01>, Hopper
<[email protected]> wrote:
> X-No-Archive:Yes
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > If true the implications for the 2.1 GHz band are not good...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/p873
>
> The thing that pisses me off about news stories of this kind are the
> complete lack of reference to any information about the study, short it
> involving the Netherlands.
>
> Where was this report published? Where can a person find the original
> report? What was the title?
>
> There's just too many questions. Like what sampling did they do? What level
> of significance? What was the test method? These can only be answered by the
> original report, not halfassed Reuters reporting.
Agreed. What a load of BS! Gosh, did they also report that living is a
terminal illness? I am jumping off a cliff right now!
- 10-01-2003, 12:10 AM #5O/SirisGuest
Re: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
In article <Mjqeb.640414$YN5.490491@sccrnsc01>,=20
[email protected] says...
> X-No-Archive:Yes
>=20
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > If true the implications for the 2.1 GHz band are not good...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/p873
>=20
> The thing that pisses me off about news stories of this kind are the
> complete lack of reference to any information about the study, short it
> involving the Netherlands.
>=20
> Where was this report published? Where can a person find the original
> report? What was the title?
>=20
> There's just too many questions. Like what sampling did they do? What lev=
el
> of significance? What was the test method? These can only be answered by =
the
> original report, not halfassed Reuters reporting.
>=20
>=20
> Hopper
Careful. Expecting to see specifics in order to discuss something is=20
considered unreasonable by at least poster over here in=20
alt.cellular.sprintpcs.
--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.
- 10-01-2003, 04:04 AM #6Phill.Guest
Re: Eur: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
In article <[email protected]>,
Al Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:34:23 -0500, [email protected] posted in
> alt.cellular.verizon:
>
> >If true the implications for the 2.1 GHz band are not good...
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/p873
>
> 1) GSM is pulsed. That may have an effect that non-pulsed modes may
> not have.
>
> 2) Most people never come close enough to an antenna to receive much
> radiation from a base station.
The test was at that lower "base station" level. Read the link.
- 10-01-2003, 04:20 AM #7Phill.Guest
Re: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
In article <Mjqeb.640414$YN5.490491@sccrnsc01>,
"Hopper" <[email protected]> wrote:
> X-No-Archive:Yes
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > If true the implications for the 2.1 GHz band are not good...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/p873
>
> The thing that pisses me off about news stories of this kind are the
> complete lack of reference to any information about the study, short it
> involving the Netherlands.
It said lots of things that makes one want to take it seriously.
It was a double blind study. Not a collection of anecdotal stories.
It used lower levels of radiation such as might be received from
a base station.
>
> Where was this report published? Where can a person find the original
> report? What was the title?
>
> There's just too many questions. Like what sampling did they do? What level
> of significance? What was the test method? These can only be answered by the
> original report, not halfassed Reuters reporting.
It was conducted by angencies of the Dutch Government, likely to be
unbiased. A 30 second Google search located http://www.tno.nl.homepage.html;
with an email address of [email protected]
>
>
Don't like the result, start nit-picking. And on no basis.
> Hopper
- 10-01-2003, 06:20 AM #8SprintposterGuest
Re: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
> complete lack of reference to any information
> about the study, short it
> involving the Netherlands
How com Phill found and posted the link so fast?
As usual with this apologist, dont like the message ;nit pick, attack, even
without facts.
- 10-01-2003, 07:21 AM #9Guest
Re: Eur: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 01:47:38 GMT, Al Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:34:23 -0500, [email protected] posted in
>alt.cellular.verizon:
>
>>If true the implications for the 2.1 GHz band are not good...
>
>>http://tinyurl.com/p873
>
>1) GSM is pulsed. That may have an effect that non-pulsed modes may
>not have.
This is wideband CDMA (W-CDMA), there's continuous emission from the
base station.
An interesting question for the Dutch testers, what happens if the
radiation is only over 1.25 MHz instead of a 5 MHz bandwidth.
Any difference in effect?
(KDDI in Japan is offering cdma2000 1xEV-DO @ 2.1 GHz, but that's only
1.25 MHz in bandwidth.)
- 10-01-2003, 06:43 PM #10Al KleinGuest
Re: Eur: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 10:04:58 GMT, "Phill." <[email protected]> posted
in alt.cellular.verizon:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> Al Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:34:23 -0500, [email protected] posted in
>> alt.cellular.verizon:
>>
>> >If true the implications for the 2.1 GHz band are not good...
>>
>> >http://tinyurl.com/p873
>>
>> 1) GSM is pulsed. That may have an effect that non-pulsed modes may
>> not have.
>>
>> 2) Most people never come close enough to an antenna to receive much
>> radiation from a base station.
>
>The test was at that lower "base station" level. Read the link.
I read it. Most people don't get close enough to a base station
antenna to receive any more radiation than they do with no base
station in the area. Remember the inverse square law.
- 10-02-2003, 05:27 AM #11Phill.Guest
Re: Eur: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
In article <[email protected]>,
Al Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
> I read it. Most people don't get close enough to a base station
> antenna to receive any more radiation than they do with no base
> station in the area. Remember the inverse square law.
Nice try. The study was conducted at the low levels people will receive.
- 10-02-2003, 06:59 PM #12Al KleinGuest
Re: Eur: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:27:47 GMT, "Phill." <[email protected]> posted
in alt.cellular.verizon:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> Al Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I read it. Most people don't get close enough to a base station
>> antenna to receive any more radiation than they do with no base
>> station in the area. Remember the inverse square law.
>Nice try. The study was conducted at the low levels people will receive.
Sorry, no. You're talking to someone trained as an RF engineer. The
"low levels" are a few orders of magnitude lower than the levels they
get from their handsets. They're lower than the radiation they get
from a standing under a ringing door bell.
- 10-04-2003, 09:32 PM #13Al KleinGuest
Re: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 10:20:35 GMT, "Phill." <[email protected]> posted
in alt.cellular.verizon:
>It used lower levels of radiation such as might be received from
> a base station.
If you're a technician working on one, not if you're a civilian
walking down the street.
- 10-06-2003, 11:03 PM #14Thomas ZielinskiGuest
Re: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
I once ran the numbers... no way... cellular radiation is a few
orders of magnitude too small to break even among the weakest chemical
bonds in the human body... (much less cause DNA damage thus
cancer...) RF heating from the milliwatt levels of a handheld phone
is ridiculous as well...
I did some research for a psuedo-science project (actually a seminar
for physicists), and could not find a shred of credible evidence to
support ANY negative health effects caused by cell phones...
It's purely unfounded paranoia compounded by the media's idiotic
portrayals.. and as far as I can determine has already cost US tax
payers millions of research dollars. (If I remember correctly,
there's a department somewhere invetigating this and powerline
radiation. . . sheesh... idiots...)
That's the end of the debate as far as I'm concerned. grab a modern
physics textbook and a basic bio book... run the numbers... it'll
take like 3 min if you know what you're doing. convince yourself.
-Tom
- 10-07-2003, 12:20 AM #15QuarkGuest
Re: Eur: 3G Mobile Signals Can Cause Nausea, Headache -Study
Al Klein wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:27:47 GMT, "Phill." <[email protected]> posted
> in alt.cellular.verizon:
>
>
>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>Al Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>I read it. Most people don't get close enough to a base station
>>>antenna to receive any more radiation than they do with no base
>>>station in the area. Remember the inverse square law.
>>
>
>>Nice try. The study was conducted at the low levels people will receive.
>
>
> Sorry, no. You're talking to someone trained as an RF engineer. The
> "low levels" are a few orders of magnitude lower than the levels they
> get from their handsets. They're lower than the radiation they get
> from a standing under a ringing door bell.
Medical College of Wisconsin - General Clinical Research Center
http://www.mcw.edu/gcrc/cop.html
I found this site when selling my home. We had high tension wires in our
back yard. One lady actually asked me if anyone on our street had gotten
cancer. The power lines were atleast 300' from the house.
I felt like saying, yea, there's a guy down the street with an arm
growing out of his neck. I printed out the power line section and put it
on the table next to the information pamphlet.
Our real estate agent told us a story of someone else who had the same
problem. They had the power company come out with a magnetic field
detector and walk around there house. Guess were the highest magnetic
field was. 4' or less from the TV set. Were most kids sit and watch the
thing.
Read and learn.
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.verizon
- T-Mobile
- Motorola
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
Creditare Eficientă
in Chit Chat