TRUCE

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> To be the "bigger man"? Nah, I don't think so. Until Rob sincerely
> apologizes, or the some of the nitpickers jump on Rob's ass like they have
> mine, I'll keep calling Rob out.



Me too. He won't admit that SMS is a long way off, as evidenced that
SprintPCS hasn't even leaked at "planned" date.

Probably close to 12th of Never for SMS on Sprint.

---

› See More: TRUCE

In article <[email protected]>,
robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm (O/Siris .) wrote:

> Phillipe2004 <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Whats the etiquette for SPAMing this group like Dream Poges does?
>
> I'd have to disagree that Larry is spamming.

A commercial post advocating his sales web site is SPAM, but he's an
apologist so it's OK?

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Eric) wrote:

> <<Whats the etiquette for SPAMing this group like Dream Poges does? >>
>
> Any type of SPAMing is just poor taste. That and Hatoncat's flooding
> are annoying. But newsgroups are unmoderated, so there's nothing we can
> do.
>
> Eric

We can identify the SPAMers and Flooders who hide behind new alias.

Michael L. Arends is today's guilty party.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> O/Siris <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.com> wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] says...
> >> Good stuff Rob. Can we all keep to Sprint related stuff, and leave the
> >> personal attacks out of all our posts?
> >
>
> >That "all" is a significant word, Phill. I can't promise *or*
> >guarantee that. But I can and will guarantee myself.
>
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for SprintPCS
> I *don't* speak for them.
>
>
> =========
>
> OK - starting at 3 PM, EDT
>
> TRUCE, you ignore Justin and SamIam,
> and I'll ignore Velden and Smith
>
> who else has been a TROLL that we should ignore personal attacks of?
>
>
> HatonCat, who I think is purposely trying to FLOOD this newsgroup to
> sabotage it, to push his Sprintinfo.
>
>
> --+--
>

I'll ignore no one. As far as I'm concerned, it's over, and I'll answer
questions when I can, take guesses when it appears no other answers are
forthcoming, and post whatever news I feel comfortable releasing within my
own
admittedly paranoid interpretation of NDA's.

On-topic, at least.

--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.


So you admit that your accusations were nothing more than trolling. Thanks
for finally being honest.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> A commercial post advocating his sales web site is SPAM, but he's an
> apologist so it's OK?
>

Commercial posts are not automatically spam. Even anti-spam advocates
agree that on-topic commercial posts are OK.

Plus, as I reported already, other posters have expressed a desire for
the information he has provided in the past.

On-topic, and solicited. Either one of them refutes any claim of spam.
And Larry's posts are both.

--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.


Another visit form the Mental Midget. Got an answer yet?

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> A commercial post advocating his sales web site is SPAM, but he's an=20
> apologist so it's OK?
>=20

Commercial posts are not automatically spam. Even anti-spam advocates=20
agree that on-topic commercial posts are OK.

Plus, as I reported already, other posters have expressed a desire for=20
the information he has provided in the past.

On-topic, and solicited. Either one of them refutes any claim of spam. =20
And Larry's posts are both.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.com> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
> > A commercial post advocating his sales web site is SPAM, but he's an
> > apologist so it's OK?
> >
>
> Commercial posts are not automatically spam. Even anti-spam advocates
> agree that on-topic commercial posts are OK.
>
> Plus, as I reported already, other posters have expressed a desire for
> the information he has provided in the past.
>
> On-topic, and solicited. Either one of them refutes any claim of spam.
> And Larry's posts are both.

says you - SPRINT APOLOGIST LIAR

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> O/Siris <robjvargas@spr=EEntpcs.c=F4m> wrote:
>=20
> > I'll ignore no one. As far as I'm concerned, it's over, and I'll answe=
r=20
> > questions when I can, take guesses when it appears no other answers are=
=20
> > forthcoming, and post whatever news I feel comfortable releasing within=
my=20
> > own=20
> > admittedly paranoid interpretation of NDA's.
>=20
>=20
> When it suits his purpose he'll disclose anything. We he's caught=20
> SPINing, all of the sudden, everything becomes "confidential", not for=20
> discussion. Double standard.
>=20

This is your way of halting the personal attacks?

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Me too. He won't admit that SMS is a long way off, as evidenced that=20
> SprintPCS hasn't even leaked at "planned" date.
>=20
> Probably close to 12th of Never for SMS on Sprint.
>=20

I'll keep this archived and see how you respond when you're proven=20
wrong.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> Me too. He won't admit that SMS is a long way off, as evidenced that
> SprintPCS hasn't even leaked at "planned" date.
>
> Probably close to 12th of Never for SMS on Sprint.
>

I'll keep this archived and see how you respond when you're proven
wrong.

--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

You're going to PROVE something Rob?

How about you be a man and prove that I was lying? I proved you made an ass
out of yourself by making assumptions several times. The least you could do
is back up your claims.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> O/Siris <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote:
>
> > I'll ignore no one. As far as I'm concerned, it's over, and I'll answer
> > questions when I can, take guesses when it appears no other answers are
> > forthcoming, and post whatever news I feel comfortable releasing within
my
> > own
> > admittedly paranoid interpretation of NDA's.
>
>
> When it suits his purpose he'll disclose anything. We he's caught
> SPINing, all of the sudden, everything becomes "confidential", not for
> discussion. Double standard.
>

This is your way of halting the personal attacks?

--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.


Like you do a week after someone leaves?

Camile Cardenas <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:


> says you - SPRINT APOLOGIST LIAR

No, so says CAUCE. Spamcop, EFF... how many different resources do you
want?

--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them




[posted via phonescoop.com]

"O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Camile Cardenas <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
>
>
> > says you - SPRINT APOLOGIST LIAR
>
> No, so says CAUCE. Spamcop, EFF... how many different resources do you
> want?
>
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint PCS
> I *don't* speak for them
>
>
>
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]


Here he is again. The LARGEST false accuser on the face of usenet. Got any
facts at all to back up your drivel?

In article <[email protected]>,
direcció[email protected] (ben dejo) wrote:

> Vargas is a bald face liar.
>
> Where are you Vargas? I want to know where you work?
>
> [email protected] (Sprintposter) wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> > > Sprint Reps that have to
> > > hit 70% of their quota to even get
> > > paid on their at risk
> >
> > vargas swore there were no quotas. Which of you two is lying. Is it just a
> > local manager thing?
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]


Now we know.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
>=20
>=20
> Now we know.
>=20

You know what?
--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.