New FCC rules of WLNP refute Sprint stalling

Look man which would you rather have charges every month, or a $5-$10
fee, when you actually decide to USE LNP? FCC could regulate a limit on
the fee. I know it aint ever gonna happen, but it would be nicer.

--
SAVE YOUR BREATH....

You'll need it to blow up your date.


[email protected] (Brandt ) wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
> What would stop any company from charging $2000 do transfer your number
> away from their company. This gets more complicated than charging
> everyone a small fee.
>
> --
> -Brandt
>
> I work for SprintPCS,
> I DON'T speak for them.
>
>
> [email protected] (Big Poppa) wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> > Did you read my post.. I said Instead are places so-called "Taxes" or
> > "Cost recovery fees" on the bills every month. I think they should only
> > charge a one time fee to those customer actually porting there number,
> > and that the fee should only be between $5-$10. They will only charge
> > the customer that small fee when they actually leave the company and
> > take the number with them. Not charge them to BRING the number to their
> > company.. You dont wanna charge a NEW customer, only a customer who is
> > leaving.
> >
> > --
> > SAVE YOUR BREATH....
> >
> > You'll need it to blow up your date.
> >
> >
> > [email protected] (Brandt ) wrote in article
> > <[email protected]>:
> > > but then the carriers could charge outrageous fees in order to keep
> > > customers.
> > >
> > > --
> > > -Brandt
> > >
> > > I work for SprintPCS,
> > > I DON'T speak for them.
> > >
> > >
> > > [email protected] (Big Poppa) wrote in article
> > > <[email protected]>:
> > > > I know the new rules.. I'm just stating how *I* think it should have
> > > > been done.. everyone has different point of views. But I do like my
> > > > idea about the One time fee. Lets have that for cost recovery instead of
> > > > monthly charges being placed on my bill.. If I want to use the number
> > > > porting service then I should pay for it.. but right now i'm being
> > > > charged for something I will more or likely not use, unless VZW starts
> > > > offering unlimited mobile web and get it now, and unlimited m2m, and
> > > > access to download content from 3rd parties.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > SAVE YOUR BREATH....
> > > >
> > > > You'll need it to blow up your date.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Group Special Mobile <look@signature_to.reply> wrote in article
> > > > <[email protected]>:
> > > > > On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 18:07:22 -0000, [email protected] (Big Poppa)
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >This is my point of view about it..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >If a customer has a balance owed that is NOT in dispute, then that
> > > > > >balance should be paid before the number is transfered.. That includeds
> > > > > >any termination fees.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >If a balance is in dispute it should be listed as such, and should allow
> > > > > >the user to port the number over.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I think the carriers should Get rid of ALL charges on the bills for Cost
> > > > > >recovery, and only charge a ONE TIME fee at the time of porting. I think
> > > > > >a $5 porting fee would be acceptable, if it removed and cost recovery
> > > > > >charges from the bill..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Thats just my POV..
> > > > >
> > > > > That may be your POV, but unfortunately it doesn't jive with what the
> > > > > FCC has decreed. Your number cannot be held hostage by a carrier for
> > > > > either balance due or contract terms. If you have remaining contract
> > > > > and you do not complete the terms of your contract you are liable for
> > > > > ETF. If when you apply for service with your new carrier your credit
> > > > > is not sterling they will either require a deposit or maybe flat out
> > > > > refuse to take you on as a subscriber. If you walk out on charges
> > > > > it's not all just forgiven. If you owe charges or fees you will be
> > > > > expected to pay those charges. If you do not pay collections will
> > > > > come after you and also your credit record will be impacted as well.
> > > > > There's no free ride. You do need to be responsible for any charges
> > > > > due.
> > > > >
> > > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > > > > To send an email reply send to
> > > > > GSMthemobilestandard ( yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > > [posted via phonescoop.com]
> > >
> > > [posted via phonescoop.com]
> >
> > [posted via phonescoop.com]
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]

[posted via phonescoop.com]

---

› See More: New FCC rules of WLNP refute Sprint stalling

It was Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:38:02 -0000, and [email protected]
(Jason Voorhes) wrote in alt.cellular.verizon:
| Verizon charges what? 1.65?

Nope. VZW charges ZERO. They have rolled the cost of implementing
WLNP into their operating costs. No line item charge like lesser
carriers.

JL


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---