Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Renaldo
    Guest
    On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:29:39 -0000, [email protected] (p lane)
    wrote:

    >
    >an absollute defense for this would be if the infomation happened to be
    >the truth...remember the line from Gone with the Wind,"I am not in the
    >habit of shooting people for telling the truth, my dear".



    This was not a mere posting of data for information purposes.
    This is totally disingenuous as if you read the pice from "Anonymous"
    (identity disclosed elsewhere) folks were instructed what to do with
    the information.

    It is too bad, you can not bring yourself to disavow that posting as
    Smith has.



    See More: Where are you now fluffers




  2. #2
    William Bray
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    This thing took on a life of it's own. I restate my position that this
    attack on Justin was underhanded. No one has business saying stuff like
    this. It is simply not appropriate. To say that you are annoyed with
    someone is one thing, but this attack? I agree with a lot of these
    posts- very bad form.

    Renaldo <[email protected]> wrote in article
    <[email protected]>:
    > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:29:39 -0000, [email protected] (p lane)
    > wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >an absollute defense for this would be if the infomation happened to be
    > >the truth...remember the line from Gone with the Wind,"I am not in the
    > >habit of shooting people for telling the truth, my dear".

    >
    >
    > This was not a mere posting of data for information purposes.
    > This is totally disingenuous as if you read the pice from "Anonymous"
    > (identity disclosed elsewhere) folks were instructed what to do with
    > the information.
    >
    > It is too bad, you can not bring yourself to disavow that posting as
    > Smith has.


    [posted via phonescoop.com]



  3. #3
    Renaldo
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:06:15 -0000, [email protected] (William Bray)
    wrote:

    >
    >This thing took on a life of it's own. I restate my position that this
    >attack on Justin was underhanded. No one has business saying stuff like
    >this. It is simply not appropriate. To say that you are annoyed with
    >someone is one thing, but this attack? I agree with a lot of these
    >posts- very bad form.



    There was and continues to be ample blame for many.

    I agree with Ben that this Newsgroup is here to help people.
    That help should be given whether or not the answer:

    :: Makes revenue for SprintPCS

    :: Makes Sprint look good - or bad.

    :: Makes the answerer look like a genius or not.

    People of good will can disagree with the means to an end,
    without cursing, calling each other names, calling one a liar,
    or attempting to harrass them by notifying their boss or their
    ISP.

    P.S. I just checked Google, and I think you're "Anonymous".



  4. #4
    p lane
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    I realize that I should not respond to your comments, which you have a
    right to. It is also the right of Justin or who ever to post whatever
    he wishes, but once they do this publically, I feel he has opened
    himself to whatever comes from it. All of us, including myself
    occasionally make poorly thought out comments, however, if his posts
    totaled the 500 or so as described, and so many were very crude, and
    personally offensive. There were many calls for this to cease, all of
    which were ignored, ridiculed, and worse. Although this may be the
    classic case of not getting into a pissing contest with a skunk, still
    yet, I think he pushed his free speech too far.


    Character is what you do when you think no one is watching you, and if
    someone acts like this secretly, then I would not want him for an
    employee, and would appreciate someone letting me know of .

    My main problem was not the content of the posts, but nuisance of those
    posts jamming up the forum with so many posts that useful info was
    difficult to find, and probably discouraged others from making posts.

    I find these forums very useful, and have been pointed out as wrong, and
    in the majority of the posts have helped me learn or understand
    something. Most of his posts were just taking up space---Only my
    opinion, and I don't mean to offend anyone----but have you noticed how
    much the trafficker is down here in the last 24 hours.



    thanks all. and especially to anoyomius

    Renaldo <[email protected]> wrote in article
    <[email protected]>:
    > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:29:39 -0000, [email protected] (p lane)
    > wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >an absollute defense for this would be if the infomation happened to be
    > >the truth...remember the line from Gone with the Wind,"I am not in the
    > >habit of shooting people for telling the truth, my dear".

    >
    >
    > This was not a mere posting of data for information purposes.
    > This is totally disingenuous as if you read the pice from "Anonymous"
    > (identity disclosed elsewhere) folks were instructed what to do with
    > the information.
    >
    > It is too bad, you can not bring yourself to disavow that posting as
    > Smith has.


    [posted via phonescoop.com]



  5. #5
    Eric
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    <<This was not a mere posting of data for information purposes. This is
    totally disingenuous as if you read the pice from "Anonymous" (identity
    disclosed elsewhere) folks were instructed what to do with the
    information. >>

    I'm not saying that the original "Justin Info" post was in good taste or
    correct -- legally or otherwise. But it just sounds like someone got
    tired of Justin's 50 foul-mouthed posts a day... with subject lines like
    "So and So is a ****ing Moron" and "Where is Rob?" and "Where is
    Tom?"... I can understand that Justin is/ws frustrated by other people
    in here -- with good reason, more or less -- but 3+ days of 50+ posts
    like this... someone just got tired of it.




  6. #6
    RW parrot
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    William, simply stated, this is the United States of America not the UK.
    in this country one is afforded the right to express his or her opinon
    (good or bad) without fear of procesacution as long as the statements
    are factual or believed to be as such.
    Public information is just that PUBLIC and if "Anonymous" cares to share
    that information, again well within his rights.
    As for the suggestion that persons should call or otherwise contact the
    employers or family or the offender (Justin) it is simply that, a
    suggestion. This would be the same as if I were to suggest that all
    Americans boycott a certain company or product because of a personal
    issue I have with them. It is up to the individual to decide if they
    will involve themselves in the boycott.

    In short pick your battles; it is not always a virtue to be on the side
    of the underdog.


    [email protected] (William Bray) wrote in article
    <[email protected]>:
    > This thing took on a life of it's own. I restate my position that this
    > attack on Justin was underhanded. No one has business saying stuff like
    > this. It is simply not appropriate. To say that you are annoyed with
    > someone is one thing, but this attack? I agree with a lot of these
    > posts- very bad form.
    >
    > Renaldo <[email protected]> wrote in article
    > <[email protected]>:
    > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:29:39 -0000, [email protected] (p lane)
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > > >
    > > >an absollute defense for this would be if the infomation happened to be
    > > >the truth...remember the line from Gone with the Wind,"I am not in the
    > > >habit of shooting people for telling the truth, my dear".

    > >
    > >
    > > This was not a mere posting of data for information purposes.
    > > This is totally disingenuous as if you read the pice from "Anonymous"
    > > (identity disclosed elsewhere) folks were instructed what to do with
    > > the information.
    > >
    > > It is too bad, you can not bring yourself to disavow that posting as
    > > Smith has.

    >
    > [posted via phonescoop.com]


    [posted via phonescoop.com]



  7. #7
    Renaldo
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:06:15 -0000, [email protected] (William Bray)
    wrote:

    >This thing took on a life of it's own. I restate my position that this
    >attack on Justin was underhanded. No one has business saying stuff like
    >this. It is simply not appropriate. To say that you are annoyed with
    >someone is one thing, but this attack? I agree with a lot of these
    >posts- very bad form.
    >



    And you happily piled on, posting this 2 days ago before you became
    "Anonymous".: Now you want to pretend otherwise?

    > It is very annoying and stupid to find troll **** all over the place.




    Mr. Bray = "Anonymous"



  8. #8
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    <snipping out all the cross posted newsgroups, save for SPCS>

    "Renaldo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:06:15 -0000, [email protected] (William

    Bray)
    > wrote:
    >
    > >This thing took on a life of it's own. I restate my position that

    this
    > >attack on Justin was underhanded. No one has business saying stuff

    like
    > >this. It is simply not appropriate. To say that you are annoyed

    with
    > >someone is one thing, but this attack? I agree with a lot of these
    > >posts- very bad form.
    > >

    >
    >
    > And you happily piled on, posting this 2 days ago before you became
    > "Anonymous".: Now you want to pretend otherwise?
    >
    > > It is very annoying and stupid to find troll **** all over the

    place.
    >
    >
    >
    > Mr. Bray = "Anonymous"


    Considering your prior 15-16 OR MORE ID changes here Phillipe to get
    around the filters, your comments about trolls are pretty funny ...
    considering you are the number one troll of this newsgroup.

    Bob





  9. #9
    Renaldo
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:13:25 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >you are the number one troll of this newsgroup.
    >
    >Bob


    And opinion is helping which newbie how?

    Smith - Still a hypocrite



  10. #10
    Renaldo
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    Smith would rather not attack Mr. Anonymous,
    thereby showing his true support for harrassment as a tool
    to suppress anything negative against Sprint.



  11. #11
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers


    "Renaldo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:13:25 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >you are the number one troll of this newsgroup.
    > >
    > >Bob

    >
    > And opinion is helping which newbie how?
    >
    > Smith - Still a hypocrite


    Not at all Phillipe ... This thread has nothing to do with a newbie
    question. So, tell me Phillipe, or should I call you Sunday Auto now
    as well ... , why do you reply to your prior comments with a new ID,
    to back up your statements? Inquiring minds want to know ... Hell,
    maybe I should notify the National Inquirer ... You must be coming up
    to some sort of record of having the most multiple personalities by
    now ...

    Bob





  12. #12
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers


    "Renaldo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Smith would rather not attack Mr. Anonymous,
    > thereby showing his true support for harrassment as a tool
    > to suppress anything negative against Sprint.


    Wait a minute Phillipe. You already have quoted me and had agreed with
    me, when I said I didn't condone Anonymous's post.

    Why do you consistently misquote other people here and just plain lie?

    Bob





  13. #13
    Jim-G
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    Bob, he and others are just practicing their skills. This is a good place
    to learn 'anarchy'.





  14. #14
    Al Klein
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:03:21 -0000, [email protected] (RW
    parrot) posted in alt.cellular.verizon:

    >William, simply stated, this is the United States of America not the UK.
    >in this country one is afforded the right to express his or her opinon
    >(good or bad) without fear of procesacution as long as the statements
    >are factual or believed to be as such.


    Yes, one is free to exhibit bad taste with no repercussions. And, no,
    I'm not a Brit, I'm American



  15. #15
    norelpref
    Guest

    Re: Where are you now fluffers

    On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:06:15 -0000, [email protected] (William Bray)
    said:

    >This thing took on a life of it's own. I restate my position that this
    >attack on Justin was underhanded. No one has business saying stuff like
    >this. It is simply not appropriate. To say that you are annoyed with
    >someone is one thing, but this attack? I agree with a lot of these
    >posts- very bad form.


    It does not take a special investigator to dig up posting history of
    someone, only a trip to groups.google.com and do an advanced search.
    dejanews.com and altavista provided this service before google brought
    it online. People might not realize everything they post on usenet is
    available FOREVER in searchable form. I can still to this day pull up
    hundreds of usenet posts of mine from as far back as 1995. If I had
    maintained the same email address in my newsreader and did not start
    using the X-No-Archive header, every one of my posts for the past 8
    years would all be tied together, yes, all the flames, when I posted
    my phone number, where I worked, what type of car I drive, where I
    live etc... Justin posted all of that information himself and it is
    all searchable online, person "anonymous" simply weeded through it and
    reposted it simple form. That is why so many people like myself do
    not use a real email addresses in usenet, never use the same signature
    line for long, and never post any meaningful personal information.
    Imagine getting in a heated flame war with someone in the newsgroup
    alt.sex.fetish.breastmilk and two years from now, your potential boss
    searches google for the email address you sent him your resume from.



  • Similar Threads

    1. RingTones
    2. alt.cellular.cingular
    3. alt.cellular.nextel
    4. alt.cellular.cingular
    5. alt.cellular.nextel



  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast