Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Sunday Auto
    Guest
    Sprint bragged on the first day of its compliance with the Industry wide
    compliance code.

    But now, many weeks later it (like Verizon) still does not have a map of large
    enough scale on its web site to be of any use to anyone.

    When will we see a proper map ?





    See More: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT




  2. #2
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT


    "Sunday Auto" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Sprint bragged on the first day of its compliance with the Industry

    wide
    > compliance code.
    >
    > But now, many weeks later it (like Verizon) still does not have a

    map of large
    > enough scale on its web site to be of any use to anyone.
    >
    > When will we see a proper map ?


    So Phillipe, here's a question for you. What does not having a map one
    can zoom in to, have to do with your subject header of NON COMPLIANCE
    ....?

    Bob





  3. #3
    Jared Robinson
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT

    He's talking about the consumer code that the wireless carriers came up
    with.

    "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in article
    <[email protected]>:
    >
    > "Sunday Auto" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]
    > > Sprint bragged on the first day of its compliance with the Industry

    > wide
    > > compliance code.
    > >
    > > But now, many weeks later it (like Verizon) still does not have a

    > map of large
    > > enough scale on its web site to be of any use to anyone.
    > >
    > > When will we see a proper map ?

    >
    > So Phillipe, here's a question for you. What does not having a map one
    > can zoom in to, have to do with your subject header of NON COMPLIANCE
    > ....?
    >
    > Bob
    >
    >


    [posted via phonescoop.com]



  4. #4
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT

    > He's talking about the consumer code that the
    > wireless carriers came up with.


    Smith is just a Troll that is also a Sprint apologist and wants to divert
    attention from Sprint's failure to provide a usable coverage map, as it has
    promised to do.



  5. #5
    Eric
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT

    <<Smith is just a Troll that is also a Sprint apologist and wants to
    divert attention from Sprint's failure to provide a usable coverage map,
    as it has promised to do. >>

    Yet another one of Phillipe's ids (catonhat) responding to himself
    (Sunday Auto). This would be funny if it wasn't so sad.




  6. #6
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT


    "Eric" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > <<Smith is just a Troll that is also a Sprint apologist and wants to
    > divert attention from Sprint's failure to provide a usable coverage map,
    > as it has promised to do. >>
    >
    > Yet another one of Phillipe's ids (catonhat) responding to himself
    > (Sunday Auto). This would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
    >


    I suspect mental illness, but until I can find Phillipe's home address to
    search his trash for empty lithium bottles, I am out of luck proving it.

    Tom Veldhouse





  7. #7
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT


    "CAT0NHAT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > > He's talking about the consumer code that the
    > > wireless carriers came up with.

    >
    > Smith is just a Troll that is also a Sprint apologist and wants to

    divert
    > attention from Sprint's failure to provide a usable coverage map, as

    it has
    > promised to do.


    Pretty lame reply Phillippe ... I wasn't trying divert attention. SPCS
    does have a national map on their site. The point is, to show where
    there is coverage. The point is, first and foremost, with where
    coverage is available locally, and in this case, the map can be zoomed
    in 200%, where it matters most.

    One can plug in any zip code to see these larger maps to see if
    coverage is available.

    Bob





  8. #8
    Big Poppa
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT

    Mabey he just found a way to filter the lithium out of cell phone
    betteries?? LOL

    --
    SAVE YOUR BREATH....

    You'll need it to blow up your date.


    "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in article
    <[email protected]>:
    >
    > "Eric" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]
    > > <<Smith is just a Troll that is also a Sprint apologist and wants to
    > > divert attention from Sprint's failure to provide a usable coverage map,
    > > as it has promised to do. >>
    > >
    > > Yet another one of Phillipe's ids (catonhat) responding to himself
    > > (Sunday Auto). This would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
    > >

    >
    > I suspect mental illness, but until I can find Phillipe's home address to
    > search his trash for empty lithium bottles, I am out of luck proving it.
    >
    > Tom Veldhouse
    >
    >


    [posted via phonescoop.com]



  9. #9
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT

    > Tom Veldhouse

    posting a personal attack off topic, and not responding to the issue of Sprint
    STILL not having a proper coverage map.



  10. #10
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT

    > (Big Poppa)

    another apologist making a personal attack rather than explaining why Sprint
    STILL hasn't posted a proper coverage map.



  11. #11
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT

    > One can plug in any zip code to see these larger
    > maps to see if coverage is available.


    NOPE. That's an apologists answer. You plug in a zipcode, and get a map that
    shows 100 miles per inch, such that 5 mile wide holes in coverage disappear.



  12. #12
    Eric
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT

    <<another apologist making a personal attack rather than explaining why
    Sprint STILL hasn't posted a proper coverage map. >>

    I don't know why you come in here asking for these "discussions" when
    you always argue over the responses you get? Save for a couple of
    people in here, *no one* has any inside information about coverage maps
    or when Sprint will post new ones... so why ask a bunch of fellow
    customers when they have no say in the matter?




  13. #13
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT


    "CAT0NHAT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > > One can plug in any zip code to see these larger
    > > maps to see if coverage is available.

    >
    > NOPE. That's an apologists answer. You plug in a zipcode, and get a

    map that
    > shows 100 miles per inch, such that 5 mile wide holes in coverage

    disappear.

    So, did you ever try clicking on the map ... one more time? No, I
    didn't think so Phillipe ...

    Try it, the map will expand once again ...

    Bob





  14. #14
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT


    "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    >
    >
    > So, did you ever try clicking on the map ... one more time? No, I
    > didn't think so Phillipe ...
    >
    > Try it, the map will expand once again ...
    >
    > Bob
    >
    >


    It will go down to about 10 miles per inch (on my 17" monitor).

    Tom Veldhouse





  15. #15
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: NON COMPLIANCE BY SPRINT

    > I don't know why you come in here asking for these
    > "discussions" when
    > you always argue over the responses you get?


    Duh - The OP was about the Sprint coverage map, not whether you like a
    particular poster or not, and which new sophmoric insult you can post.



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast