Number Porting yet?

Looking to swithc from ATTWS to SPCS. Anybody had any experience here?

--

---

› See More: Number Porting yet?

Stud Muffin wrote:

> Looking to swithc from ATTWS to SPCS. Anybody had any experience here?
>
> --
Porting doesn't go into effect until November 24th.

> Looking to swithc from ATTWS to SPCS. Anybody > had any experience here?


Out of the frying pan and into the fire?

I've had BOTH, through good and bad. Better the devil you know.

> > Looking to swithc from ATTWS to SPCS. Anybody > had any experience
here?
>
>
> Out of the frying pan and into the fire?

"Stud Muffin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:XQenb.43941$HS4.183634@attbi_s01...

> Better the devil you know.

Hey, you'd best trade mark that ---- else the Clowns of Kansas will be using
that in their marketing materials.

On 27 Oct 2003 18:20:08 GMT, [email protected] (CAT0NHAT) wrote:

>> Looking to swithc from ATTWS to SPCS. Anybody > had any experience here?
>
>
>Out of the frying pan and into the fire?

Not necessarily. As always (always, always, always - why must this
be constantly reiterated?) it's case by case.

I'm in lower Manhattan and my service is far better with SPCS than
my two of my friends who are on ATT. They stick with it though, because
it's familiar. (Old story).

DGI

> I'm in lower Manhattan and my service is far
> better with SPCS than my two of my friends who
> are on ATT. They stick with it though, because
> it's familiar. (Old story).

I believe you may be mis-stating things. Perhaps you mean the Sprint Coverage
seems better, rather than "service" as when you call in with a problem?

CAT0NHAT wrote:

>> I'm in lower Manhattan and my service is far
>> better with SPCS than my two of my friends who
>> are on ATT. They stick with it though, because
>> it's familiar. (Old story).
>
> I believe you may be mis-stating things. Perhaps you mean the Sprint
> Coverage seems better, rather than "service" as when you call in with a
> problem?

Or maybe he meant what he said, Phil. Not everybody has the 'Sprint must
die' fantasy that you do.

BTW, have you figured out my 'vested interest' in Sprint yet? Yeah- didn't
think so- would require functional brain cells.

I took it to mean his phone service. As in the ability to make
and receive calls.


Scott Stephenson wrote:
> CAT0NHAT wrote:
>
>
>>>I'm in lower Manhattan and my service is far
>>>better with SPCS than my two of my friends who
>>>are on ATT. They stick with it though, because
>>>it's familiar. (Old story).
>>
>>I believe you may be mis-stating things. Perhaps you mean the Sprint
>>Coverage seems better, rather than "service" as when you call in with a
>>problem?
>
>
> Or maybe he meant what he said, Phil. Not everybody has the 'Sprint must
> die' fantasy that you do.
>
> BTW, have you figured out my 'vested interest' in Sprint yet? Yeah- didn't
> think so- would require functional brain cells.

Jerome Zelinske wrote:

> I took it to mean his phone service. As in the ability to make
> and receive calls.
>
>
> Scott Stephenson wrote:
>> CAT0NHAT wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>I'm in lower Manhattan and my service is far
>>>>better with SPCS than my two of my friends who
>>>>are on ATT. They stick with it though, because
>>>>it's familiar. (Old story).
>>>
>>>I believe you may be mis-stating things. Perhaps you mean the Sprint
>>>Coverage seems better, rather than "service" as when you call in with a
>>>problem?
>>
>>
>> Or maybe he meant what he said, Phil. Not everybody has the 'Sprint must
>> die' fantasy that you do.
>>
>> BTW, have you figured out my 'vested interest' in Sprint yet? Yeah-
>> didn't think so- would require functional brain cells.

So did I, Jerome. Phil just has to find some way to slam Sprint, even if it
means twisting other people's words to his liking. All you have to do is
ask him to supply facts and he goes away.

> Phil just has to find some way to slam Sprint,

No, I just object when an apologist like you trys to make excuses for Sprint
while they;re screwing someone over.

CAT0NHAT wrote:

>> Phil just has to find some way to slam Sprint,
>
> No, I just object when an apologist like you trys to make excuses for
> Sprint while they;re screwing someone over.
Are you really this stupid in real life? Show me (once again) where I
made any comment one way or the other. The fact that your shoe size is
larger than your IQ should not present a huge challenge in this effort.

BTW, what's my 'vested interest'? You seem to be avoiding the question-
something else you're famous for in this group.

On 27 Oct 2003 22:09:30 GMT, [email protected] (CAT0NHAT) wrote:

>> I'm in lower Manhattan and my service is far
>> better with SPCS than my two of my friends who
>> are on ATT. They stick with it though, because
>> it's familiar. (Old story).
>
>I believe you may be mis-stating things. Perhaps you mean the Sprint Coverage
>seems better, rather than "service" as when you call in with a problem?

In 4.5 years I've only had occasion to call in with a problem
twice, and both times the matter was settled quickly and to my
satisfaction. I've called for amendments to my service three or four times
with similar results.

You're right, I was envisioning coverage when I said my service is
far better, but that is because I have not had problems.

Your mileage etc.

DGI

On 27 Oct 2003 23:25:39 GMT, [email protected] (CAT0NHAT) wrote:

>> Phil just has to find some way to slam Sprint,
>
>No, I just object when an apologist like you trys to make excuses for Sprint
>while they;re screwing someone over.

As posted above, I did, indeed, mean making and receiving calls -
which I can do more successfully than my two friends who are with AT&T.

DGI

"CAT0NHAT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > Phil just has to find some way to slam Sprint,
>
> No, I just object when an apologist like you trys to make excuses for
Sprint
> while they;re screwing someone over.

Again, who is apologizing Phillipe?

Bob