Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31
  1. #16
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    > CS is following up, for yours truly and for others.

    Too bad the rest of the free world is not experiencing that and SprintPCS is
    still losing money, and gaining customers at 1/8 the rate of Verizon.



    See More: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.




  2. #17
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    CAT0NHAT <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> CS is following up, for yours truly and for others.

    >
    > Too bad the rest of the free world is not experiencing that and SprintPCS is
    > still losing money, and gaining customers at 1/8 the rate of Verizon.


    So go switch to T-Mobile and STFU...

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  3. #18
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    > So go switch to T-Mobile and STFU...

    I might have considered Verizon, but I got $795 in discounts and credits as
    part of my new Retention plan. When my year is up next July I'll itemize it for
    you.

    And despite your request, I'll keep posting, sorry the fact SprintPCS is losing
    money upsets you.



  4. #19
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.


    "Steven J Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > CAT0NHAT <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >> CS is following up, for yours truly and for others.

    > >
    > > Too bad the rest of the free world is not experiencing that and

    SprintPCS is
    > > still losing money, and gaining customers at 1/8 the rate of Verizon.

    >
    > So go switch to T-Mobile and STFU...


    Steve, he just might do the former ... but he will never do the latter ...

    Bob





  5. #20
    DrWakk
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    right to hell

    "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Scott Stephenson wrote:
    >
    > > CAT0NHAT wrote:
    > >
    > >> Leading Sprint apologist [email protected] says:
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>> Would that include industry analysts that might
    > >>> post to this group?
    > >>
    > >> The link was already posted, but just for you here it is again:
    > >>
    > >> <A
    > >>

    > HREF="http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/tech/scottmoritz/10121888.html">http
    > >> ://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/tech/scottmoritz/10121888.html</A>

    > >
    > > What does that have to do with the question, fool? I said INDUSTRY
    > > ANALYSTS, not financial analysts. If you don't know the difference,

    just
    > > keep silent.

    >
    >
    > Here Phil- let me give you a few hints:
    >
    > Do the Wall St. guys know anything about the billing systems, network
    > technology, individual rate plans, phone technology (not just what is in
    > the press releases), network expansion plans, fraud programs, network
    > upgrades, retention programs, 3G technology, technology in development
    > (again, details, not press releases), or account structures (this list is
    > just for starters)? Or do they know the window dressing stuff and use

    that
    > in conjunction with the financials to do their analysis after the fact?
    > Did you ever stop to think (oh wait- this is Phil I'm talking to) that
    > there might be people in the industry (INDUSTRY ANALYSTS) that use the
    > great big partial list (among other things) I just gave you to determine
    > the true place a company has in the industry, and uses the financials only
    > to determine market trends, and not profitability? Last hint, Phil- this
    > last group of people DO exist, and.......hehehehehehe......they exist in
    > this group. They don't care about any particular company (translation-

    not
    > apologists) as long as the information posted is accurate.
    >
    > Guess that might shoot your great personal knowledge base all to hell.






  6. #21
    DrWakk
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    for investors, stock price drops afford a greater opportunity to purchase
    shares at a reduced rate, which often results in greater gains for the
    investor...
    the people who need to worried about low stock prices are current investors
    who may sell in the short run and lose...or ESPP members in the respective
    compaies affected whose stock purchase price may have been higher when
    purchased, have met the time guidelines required and can now sell their
    shares with no penalties (and must sell now to resolve financial issues in
    their families during the time when shares are down-priced).
    so HAKUNA MATATA
    don't worry about share prices, just be sure to buy in at the low and sell
    higher.....

    "norelpref" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On 28 Oct 2003 15:28:04 GMT, [email protected] (CAT0NHAT) wrote:
    >
    > >

    > On 10/25/2003, a thread was started with the subject of: "AT&T
    > Wireless stock tumbles", your immediate reply was that fact had
    > nothing to do with Sprint performance and it was a Sprint apologist
    > method of trying to justify Sprint stock falling, now, a few days
    > later you post something about positive about Verizon and are directly
    > comparing it to Sprint. Exactly how is this any different from
    > someone posting about AT&T a few days ago?
    >
    > I do not know what point you are trying to make (or care) but all I
    > see is you are a troll. How does Verizon stock going up and Sprint
    > falling effect anyone in this group? This is another one of your piss
    > poor attempts to draw attention to yourself. You think Sprint is
    > going or is already falling beyond help, that opinion is fine and may
    > or may not be the same opinion as others, but do you have to post it
    > with 10 different names multiple times a day in every thread in a
    > different subtle form every day? If you truely feel that strong about
    > it, do us all a favor and get off your computer and go stand in front
    > of your local Sprint store with a ****ing sign and bother them. Maybe
    > someone there will take you more seriously.
    >






  7. #22
    DrWakk
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    thanks steve

    "Steven J Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > CAT0NHAT <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >> CS is following up, for yours truly and for others.

    > >
    > > Too bad the rest of the free world is not experiencing that and

    SprintPCS is
    > > still losing money, and gaining customers at 1/8 the rate of Verizon.

    >
    > So go switch to T-Mobile and STFU...
    >
    > --
    > JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    > 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    > Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    > 888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]






  8. #23
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    > for investors, stock price drops afford a greater
    > opportunity to purchase shares at a reduced rate,


    And so do tell us. How many thousand shares of SprintPCS are you buying?

    BUY LOW, SELL LOWER ?



  9. #24
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    CAT0NHAT <[email protected]> wrote:

    > I might have considered Verizon


    Oh, I'm glad you didn't. I don't need to listen to your crap in the VZW
    newsgroup too.

    It doesn't. The fact that you lie and refuse to provide proof of some of your
    claims when asked does bug me a bit.

    The fact that you keep on morphing bugs me a lot. It means that you know
    people don't want to listen to your bull****, and you are trying to get in
    their faces anyhow.

    You never did address my point that you were forging an e-mail address of
    a domain that was registered to someone else... although you don't seem to
    be using the pearl.com address anymore (the domain is registered to a company
    in the UK). I suppose you figure that's alright.


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  10. #25
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    CAT0NHAT <[email protected]> wrote:
    > money upsets you.



    Oh... and you are still repeatedly ignoring my point that you claim to have
    plonked me but have started replying to me again.

    But remember, everyone; Phillipe doesn't lie.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  11. #26
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    <A HREF="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</A> today's leading
    Sprint apologist wants to change the subject from Sprint versus Verizon, as he
    has no way to apologize for Sprint losing money, in large part because of its
    abysmal customer service.

    Steve: Verizon made money, added over 1 million new users last quarter, Sprint
    didn't. And thats no lie.

    SPIN that.



  12. #27
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.


    "CAT0NHAT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > All I did is post a Reuters story. A Sprint apologist who cant accept

    verizon
    > being profitable while Sprint continues to lose money set up the following
    > strawman:
    >
    > > So, let's abandon all other wireless carriers,
    > > regardless of features or price of service, and go > with the biggest,

    or
    > whomever pleases Wall
    > > Street!

    >
    > Where the f*** did you come up with that conclusion? No one said that,

    hinted
    > that or asked for that.


    ROTFLOL .... Oh ... this is classic Phillipe. You have always complained
    about cussing and then you go plonking that poster ... and yet you are doing
    it here. You didn't ***** out the word, but that makes no difference, as
    your intent was fully there ...

    So ... what's this mean Phillipe? Are you going to plonk yourself? Please,
    don't let me stop you ...

    Bob





  13. #28
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    <A HREF="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</A> one
    of the main SprintPCS apologists tries to go vert Off Topic (OT) with f***
    instead of discussing that Verizon Wireless is doing very well, and SprintPCS
    is losing money, although the stock did have a "Dead Cat bounce" today up to
    $4.43/share.



  14. #29
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    CAT0NHAT <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Steve: Verizon made money, added over 1 million new users last quarter, Sprint
    > didn't. And thats no lie.
    >
    > SPIN that.


    I'm not arguing with you.

    I have no problem with Verizon adding over one million users and Sprint
    not adding them, or whatever point you happen to be making.

    I am sick and ****ing tired of hearing the same thing from you five
    gazillian times, and so are a lot of other people, and obviously you know
    that or you wouldn't have changed your posting address fifteen times.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  15. #30
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Verizon, in contrast to SprintPCS, had good results.

    Steven J Sobol <[email protected]> wrote:
    > CAT0NHAT <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> money upsets you.

    >
    >
    > Oh... and you are still repeatedly ignoring my point that you claim to have
    > plonked me but have started replying to me again.
    >
    > But remember, everyone; Phillipe doesn't lie.



    So Phillipe, why did you say you'd plonked me?

    I won't expect an answer, of course.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast