Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest
    To those of you who tire of this subjuect, I would ignore this thread. And
    I normally wouldn't go so far off topic in this group, but I've decided to
    consolidate all of Phil's rantings into a single post, because I just can't
    keep up with the thirty or so active threads in here that he has polluted
    with his lack of facts. For those of you who choose to stick around, this
    could be entertaining- you may actually get to see someone label themselves
    as the fool they really are.

    OK Phil- you have ignored any question asked of you, and failed to provide a
    shred of backup to your constant whining and crying. So, now the challenge
    is made- answer the questions below, and show everybody just how little you
    know about everything to do with both Sprint and the wireless industry. By
    the way- your answers need to include independent facts, and not your own
    meaningless words. And to jog your memory, I'll quote you wherever
    possible, although you have failed to address many of these questions in
    the past.

    1. You have labeled me and many others in this group 'apologists' when we
    don't say what you want to hear. I can't speak for the others, but in my
    case, show me one quote where I have apologized for the actions of Sprint
    specifically, and not talked about them as a part of the entire industry.
    Rmember, I have to be talking sepcifically about SPrint- no
    generalizations, no industry-wide comments.

    Recently, Phil Said:
    "Typical Sprint apologist, proven wrong, SprintPCS stock is in the toilet,
    and
    his reposnse is to insult the messenger and ignore the message."

    in response to:

    "Do the Wall St. guys know anything about the billing systems, network
    technology, individual rate plans, phone technology (not just what is in
    the press releases), network expansion plans, fraud programs, network
    upgrades, retention programs, 3G technology, technology in development
    (again, details, not press releases), or account structures (this list is
    just for starters)? Or do they know the window dressing stuff and use that
    in conjunction with the financials to do their analysis after the fact?
    Did you ever stop to think (oh wait- this is Phil I'm talking to) that
    there might be people in the industry (INDUSTRY ANALYSTS) that use the
    great big partial list (among other things) I just gave you to determine
    the true place a company has in the industry, and uses the financials only
    to determine market trends, and not profitability? Last hint, Phil- this
    last group of people DO exist, and.......hehehehehehe......they exist in
    this group. They don't care about any particular company (translation- not
    apologists) as long as the information posted is accurate."



    2. You have also stated that I have a 'vested interest' in Sprint. What is
    it- you seem to have information if you are making such a bold statement.

    This question has gone unanswered.

    3. Is it your claim that every cellular company that loses money in a
    quarter will go out of business? If so, please show this trend through
    articles and analysis.


    Recently, Phil said:
    "Lets start over. Here is the Reuters story that Sprint apologists try to go
    OFF
    TOPIC on so it wont be discussed. SprintPCS is losing money, if they keep it
    up
    they WILL go out of business. "

    4. Is it your claim that Wall Street financial analysts know more about
    the industry than the industry's own analysts? Do you even acknowledge the
    existence of industry analysts? Do you know more than the industry
    analysts?

    When asked this question, Phil replied:
    "The link was already posted, but just for you here it is again:"

    5. Is it your claim that stock price alone dictates the survival of
    cellular companies?

    6. In an industry where the leaders in Customer Satisfaction can't reach
    70% satisfaction, is there a big difference between first and last?

    7. Why all of the name changes? Afraid people are going to miss your
    pearls of wisdom?

    This question has never been answered.


    8. Only a person with any true experience in the industry would normally
    make the claims that you do. What is your experience, other than being a
    whiney pain-in-the-arse end user?

    This question has never been answered.


    I think eight is enough for me (to start). Now Phil, it is easy to ignore a
    post to a thread that doesn't have your name in the title. Now you get
    your chance to show the world your true knowledge base. And if you choose
    to ignore, that will also speak volumes to your utter lack of having a
    clue.

    To Steven, Tom, Rob and anyone else who has any unanswered questions for
    Phil, feel free to jump right in. This may not shut him up, but it is
    certainly a chance to show him for what he is.

    Oh- I almost forgot. I will be shooting down each of your answers if they
    appear to be out of line, and unlike you, I'll bring independent sources to
    the table to back myself up.



    See More: An Open Challenge to Phil (CAT0NHAT, etc.)




  2. #2
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: An Open Challenge to Phil (CAT0NHAT, etc.)

    Alas Scott ... I doubt Phillipe has a strong enough soul to answer this
    thread. He's a just a troll who gets his jollies from imposing his need to
    see his name out there ...


    "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    <snipped>





  3. #3
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: An Open Challenge to Phil (CAT0NHAT, etc.)

    Bob Smith wrote:

    > Alas Scott ... I doubt Phillipe has a strong enough soul to answer this
    > thread. He's a just a troll who gets his jollies from imposing his need to
    > see his name out there ...
    >
    >
    > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]
    > <snipped>


    I'm in total agreement, Bob. But now he will show his true colors, because
    not responding speaks much louder than anything he could ever say.



  4. #4
    CAT0NHAT
    Guest

    Re: An Open Challenge to Phil (CAT0NHAT, etc.)

    And this thread answers which newbies question? Go ahead and lie to the people
    with dropped calls and tell them to get a PRL update, and itrs all their fault.

    You Sprint apologists are amazing.

    P.S. Which one of you has bought SprintPCS stock lately?



  5. #5
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: An Open Challenge to Phil (CAT0NHAT, etc.)

    CAT0NHAT <[email protected]> wrote:
    > And this thread answers which newbies question?


    It doesn't answer the same questions that your idiotic posts don't answer.

    BTW, didn't you have me plonked, liar?

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  6. #6
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: An Open Challenge to Phil (CAT0NHAT, etc.)


    "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    >
    > To Steven, Tom, Rob and anyone else who has any unanswered questions for
    > Phil, feel free to jump right in. This may not shut him up, but it is
    > certainly a chance to show him for what he is.
    >


    Don't lump me (assuming you are referring to me) in there. I have not had a
    question for Phillipe (other than rhetorical) in months. He has been
    plonked, plonked and replonked ...

    Tom Veldhouse





  7. #7
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: An Open Challenge to Phil (CAT0NHAT, etc.)

    CAT0NHAT wrote:

    > And this thread answers which newbies question? Go ahead and lie to the
    > people with dropped calls and tell them to get a PRL update, and itrs all
    > their fault.
    >
    > You Sprint apologists are amazing.
    >
    > P.S. Which one of you has bought SprintPCS stock lately?


    It answers no questions for newbies. It was not intended to, and I have yet
    to see a post from you that tells newbies anything. And your inability to
    answer the questions in the original post will be forever archived for all
    newbies to see (I plan on referencing this thread and your lack of response
    frequently in the future). You have now documented your lack of a clue,
    and the true lack of depth to your cellular knowledge. Congratulations,
    you have just identified yourself as the dictionary definition of a
    newsgroup troll for all to see. And all I had to do was ask a few
    questions- that was way too easy.



  8. #8
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: An Open Challenge to Phil (CAT0NHAT, etc.)

    CAT0NHAT wrote:

    > And this thread answers which newbies question? Go ahead and lie to the
    > people with dropped calls and tell them to get a PRL update, and itrs all
    > their fault.
    >
    > You Sprint apologists are amazing.
    >
    > P.S. Which one of you has bought SprintPCS stock lately?




    It answers no questions for newbies. It was not intended to, and I have yet
    to see a post from you that tells newbies anything. And your inability to
    answer the questions in the original post will be forever archived for all
    newbies to see (I plan on referencing this thread and your lack of response
    frequently in the future). You have now documented your lack of a clue,
    and the true lack of depth to your cellular knowledge. Congratulations,
    you have just identified yourself as the dictionary definition of a
    newsgroup troll for all to see. And all I had to do was ask a few
    questions- that was way too easy.



  • Similar Threads