-
You've seen those commercials where Verizon is supposedly getting more coverage in the U.S. than AT&T. The Maps of both carriers are shown and apparently AT&T's coverage in almost non-existent. Well, studies have been done and proven that AT&T is getting the raw end of the deal when it comes to coverage.
According to the New York Times, they have data from several different wireless networking companies that seem to go against the commercials. Global Wireless Solutions covered more than three million miles just this year and placed more than three million voice calls and the results were that AT&T's data is 40 to 50 percent better and higher than that of Verizon as well as other competitors.
Another company, Root Wireless, done 4.7 million tests on smartphones for each of the four major carriers, that are located in seven big areas: Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles/Orange County, New York, Seattle/Tacoma, the San Francisco Bay Area, and Washington. The outcome was that AT&T had a faster download and a signal strength of 75 percent or better compared to that of Verizon.
Kinda makes you wonder where the TV commercials are getting there info.
via: The New York Times > Log In
› See More: AT&T getting raw end of the deal in commercialsLast edited by tavenger5; 12-14-2009 at 02:55 PM.
- 12-14-2009, 07:20 AM #2Phone Expert
- Carrier
- Verizon Wireless
- Location
- NYC/NJ AREA
- Posts
- 1,050 - liked 107 times
- Blog Entries
- 94
Re: AT&T getting raw end of the deal in commercials
The link below to an article concerning coverage overload is proof their network is sluggish and questionable at times. If a system can't handle the load of their customers you end up with drop calls and poor connections.
This would make me hesitate to use at&t because i went through this with nextel many years ago, as they grew, their system could expand to supply demand which create many dead areas, and drop calls GALORE.
I think AT&T customers are the ones getting a BAD WRAP from AT&T, their coverage may be there... but is it good, is it strong, is there poor connections or bad coverage in respected areas that they cover. The things that stopped me from getting an iPhone at the time was... AT&T, no exchangeable battery capability, and no available insurance, i'm a strong advocate of APPLE products... except the iPhone
I'm sure some areas AT&T provides great service for people, but when usage becomes a problem or issue, it could only get worst as sales of smart-phones go up. AT&T customers only hope is for AT&T looses customers to reduce the demand on their system.
***************
AT&T considers incentives to curb heavy data usage | Wireless - CNET News
... iPhone users on average consume five to seven times more data per month than average wireless subscribers, according to analyst firm Sanford Bernstein. And all this usage is clogging the network, causing many iPhone users, especially in large cities such as New York and San Francisco, to experience dropped calls, slow 3G service, and issues connecting to the network at all.....
- 12-14-2009, 09:46 AM #3
- 12-14-2009, 11:40 AM #4Newbie
- Posts
- 4
Re: AT&T getting raw end of the deal in commercials
Unfortunately, I don't think the good majority of users are going to understand the difference. I know people are becoming more tech saavy, but they just still aren't quite there yet. I think the only reason AT&T had to drop their suit was because Verizon was technically correct about the 3G coverage area.
- 12-14-2009, 12:23 PM #5Phone Expert
- Carrier
- Verizon Wireless
- Location
- NYC/NJ AREA
- Posts
- 1,050 - liked 107 times
- Blog Entries
- 94
Re: AT&T getting raw end of the deal in commercials
- 12-14-2009, 06:26 PM #6Super Moderator
- Carrier
- Verizon Wireless
- Location
- Northridge, Los Angeles, CA
- Posts
- 1,884 - liked 298 times
- Blog Entries
- 5
Re: AT&T getting raw end of the deal in commercials
Here are the SPECIFIC facts.
Today, before posting this thread, I visited 2 Verizon Wireless stores (direct ones) in my area and did the same to two AT&T corporate stores in my area. My son has an AT&T phone (since I basically let him choose which one he wanted and which carrier). He has the Apple iPhone 3G [S]. I have the LG enV Touch; however, my brother has the Moto Droid.
So I used the two devices (Droid and iPhone) to do my research. I visited both of the Stores (both in the same city) and spoke with them. Obviously when you speak directly to the company, you're going to get biased feedback.
Here was the response from one Verizon Wireless store when asked what they really felt about the two networks.
In Northern California and most of the west coast, I'd definitely choose Verizon Wireless. They provide adequate service with a dropped call rate of roughly 1.2%
AT&T was then asked the exact same question, here is their response:
AT&T provides nearly perfect coverage nationally. If you were to travel from California to the east coast on Highway 44, you'd have coverage the entire way with AT&T. I'm not sure exactly what the expected dropped call percentage is.
Well, what about data? How good is the data with AT&T.
Here's Verizon's response:
Verizon Wireless has the largest 3G data network compared to any wireless carrier. It covers 98% of Verizon's entire coverage area (including extended network) and is more reliable than any other network's 3G. We've recently been restricted from adding more 3G coverage by the FCC due to the large availability of this service from Verizon Wireless. Our 3G speeds are faster than the average person's DSL connection
AT&T stated:
Our 3G network is constantly expanding. We offer both domestic and international 3G coverage. Our 3G network is definitely expanding (note he stated this twice). This town should have 3G pretty soon.
Using Speedtest.net, this is what I found:
With full bars of EV-DO for Verizon 3G (rev. A), Verizon had download speeds of up to 5.6 MB/s...WOW. AT&T on the iPhone had download speeds of 3.2 MB/s. Verizon had download speeds of 1.32 MB/s and AT&T had download speeds of .98 MB/s.
Keep in mind that in Sacramento you are almost guaranteed to have the best service available. Verizon's first 3G network in California began in Sacramento. AT&T's began in a town nearby.
Also note that Verizon Wireless is only using the 3G map that AT&T makes available to the public. They didn't make no special map to make AT&T look bad. They only surfaced what AT&T already made available.
This is the map Verizon should have used (blue being 3G and orange being coverage without 3G). Dark orange is coverage AT&T owns and light orange is off network (free roaming) coverage.
Also be cautious of asking AT&T where 3G coverage exists. They'll try and convince you that EDGE is a form of 3G, but it really isn't. It's more of a 2.5G.
--------
Please note the above information is based on my location(s) and may be different from what you see or know...since wireless coverage varies from area to area.Last edited by nicknrm; 12-14-2009 at 06:30 PM.
- 12-20-2009, 10:27 PM #7Junior Member
- Posts
- 7
Re: AT&T getting raw end of the deal in commercials
AT&T brought this upon themself. They dont have great coverage and their phones suck. I had AT&T for a few weeks and I had so many dropped calls that I went back to Verizon! I can't wait until Verizon gets the iphone next year!
- 12-23-2009, 07:39 AM #8
Re: AT&T getting raw end of the deal in commercials
I've had ZERO problems with my iPhone. Sure, 3G coverage does slow down, but with the wide availability of Wi-fi connections, I find that I don't use 3G as much as I do the wi-fi. And simple phone calls have never been a problem.
Similar Threads
- Nextel
- alt.cellular.verizon
- Chit Chat
Real estate investment in the UAE
in Chit Chat