Telstra's 8.4 million mobile-phone users will need to buy a newhandset

Lance Lyon <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote

>>>>>>>> I'm curious as to how the hell 3g is
>>>>>>>> supposed to work in rural areas.

>>>>>>> The same way that GSM and CDMA "work".

>>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>>> They provide coverage over a given area, subject
>>>>>>> to the limitations of the terrain and usage

>>>>>> GSM doesnt work like that.

>>>>> GSM does work like that.

>>>> No it doesnt. Its got a digital cliff, you
>>>> stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning child.

>>> Which is what I said Rod, a network provides coverage over a GIVEN
>>> area (35km radius), SUBJECT TO limitations of terrain and usage.

>> You didnt even mention the digital cliff in your original, you
>> silly little pig ignorant lying dunny cleaning ****wit child.

>>>>> but it provides an amount of coverage (up to 35k radius),

>>> Exactly the same, sorry you are too retarded to understand

>> That came later, you silly little pig ignorant
>> lying dunny cleaning ****wit child.

> Watch him wriggle......

No surprise that you're on the top of the mex's list for the
bums rush and that you've never been able to make out
outside the biggest sheltered workshop in the country.

---

› See More: Telstra's 8.4 million mobile-phone users will need to buy a newhandset

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

No surprise that you're on the top of the mex's list for the
> bums rush and that you've never been able to make out
> outside the biggest sheltered workshop in the country.

Roddles, Roddles, Roddles - tell me, have you actually ever had a job (that
lasted more than a week b4 you got sacked for your horrid cusomer service,
ahem, "skills") or have you always been a dole bludger ?

Lance

http://sydneyferries.t35.com

Lance Lyon <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote

>> No surprise that you're on the top of the mex's list for the
>> bums rush and that you've never been able to make out
>> outside the biggest sheltered workshop in the country.

> Roddles, Roddles, Roddles - tell me, have you actually ever had a job (that
> lasted more than a week b4 you got sacked for your horrid cusomer service,
> ahem, "skills")

Yep, try decades, literally.

> or have you always been a dole bludger ?

I've told you more than once I have never
ever recieved even a cent of welfare, ever.

I wont even qualify for the aged pension
either, FAR too many assets for that.

> They wont be able to see any reason why they
> should have to replace what is working fine either.
>
> Specially when so much of the cdma network
> has been paid for by the govt directly.

So much? $150m of $1b is "so much"?

> > Which is what I said Rod, a network provides coverage over a GIVEN
> > area (35km radius), SUBJECT TO limitations of terrain and usage.
>
> You didnt even mention the digital cliff in your original, you
> silly little pig ignorant lying dunny cleaning ****wit child.

Thats what the words "given area" imply, ****wit

>
> >>> but it provides an amount of coverage (up to 35k radius),
>
> > Exactly the same, sorry you are too retarded to understand

Thats what the words "given area" imply, ****wit

>
> That came later, you silly little pig ignorant
> lying dunny cleaning ****wit child.
>
>

Michael <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote

>>>>>>>> I'm curious as to how the hell 3g is
>>>>>>>> supposed to work in rural areas.

>>>>>>> The same way that GSM and CDMA "work".

>>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>>> They provide coverage over a given area, subject
>>>>>>> to the limitations of the terrain and usage

>>>>>> GSM doesnt work like that.

>>>>> GSM does work like that.

>>>> No it doesnt. Its got a digital cliff, you
>>>> stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning child.

>>> Which is what I said Rod, a network provides coverage over a GIVEN
>>> area (35km radius), SUBJECT TO limitations of terrain and usage.

>> You didnt even mention the digital cliff in your original, you
>> silly little pig ignorant lying dunny cleaning ****wit child.

> Thats what the words "given area" imply, ****wit

Lying, as always. There is no such 'given area' with cdma,
so it aint THE SAME AS GSM in that regard, you silly little
pathetic excuse for a lying bull**** artist dunny cleaning child.

>>>>> but it provides an amount of coverage (up to 35k radius),

>>> Exactly the same, sorry you are too retarded to understand

> Thats what the words "given area" imply, ****wit

Lying, as always. There is no such 'given area' with cdma,
so it aint THE SAME AS GSM in that regard, you silly little
pathetic excuse for a lying bull**** artist dunny cleaning child.

Michael <[email protected]> wrote:

>> They wont be able to see any reason why they
>> should have to replace what is working fine either.

>> Specially when so much of the cdma network
>> has been paid for by the govt directly.

> So much? $150m of $1b is "so much"?

You've just plucked those numbers out of your arse, you silly
little pathetic excuse for a lying bull**** artist dunny cleaning child.