Boycott Optus (SingTel)

"ralph" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >> Singapore has been murdering drug mules for years ... done **** all to
> >> deter anyone
> >
> >Who says we do it to deter anyone?
> >We do it because we LOVE hanging those
> >bastard drug smugglers.
>
> Finally ... an honest reply from a Singaporean!

So when are you coming to
Singapore?
We need to hang a few more drug smugglers
to hit our target for this year...
LOL.


> Don't let the PAP find out you've been telling the truth to foreigners
> ;-)

What truth?
I tried to entice cowardly drug smugglers
like you to come here and be our "guest"...
LOL.


> Now care to admit the other truth ... that your hypocrite country
> also finances Burmese drug lords.

Hehe...so when is Australia going
to charge these drug lords that you
talking about?
LOL.

---

› See More: Boycott Optus (SingTel)

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:04:43 +0800, "Observer" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Hehe...so when is Australia going
>to charge these drug lords that you
>talking about?

We can't ... they live in Burma ... financed by Singapore banks.

You must be so proud of them!

"ralph" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:04:43 +0800, "Observer" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Hehe...so when is Australia going
> >to charge these drug lords that you
> >talking about?
>
> We can't ... they live in Burma ... financed by Singapore banks.
>
> You must be so proud of them!

Really?
australia do not trade with burma?
LOL.

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:07:46 +1000, [email protected] wrote:

>his brother was convicted of trafficking twice previously, the debt he
>accumulated was a byproduct of the associated criminal law case.

Have you got a source for that?

already have
they arent getting anymore of my money

"Rhye" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> What retards.
> Personally I couldn't give a **** **** if OPTUS/Singel didn't comment on
the
> Van situation, as OPTUS/Singel is here to provide telecommunications, not
to
> provide Sympathy over this van Palava or even comment about it... GET THE
> **** OVER IT.
>
> Sure, blame the Singapore Government about the to be death, but dont take
it
> out on optus... My god some people are stupid...
>
>
> "thegoons" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/n.../11/100028.php
> >
>
>

Say NO! to drugs say YES! to the execution.

thegoons wrote:
> http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/n.../11/100028.php
>
>

budgie wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:07:46 +1000, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> his brother was convicted of trafficking twice previously, the debt he
>> accumulated was a byproduct of the associated criminal law case.
>
> Have you got a source for that?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nguyen_Tuong_Van
mentions that he did it to pay off his brothers legal debts.

http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.a...001021,00.html
says he did it to pay off the debts and mentions the brother had been
convicted of heroin smuggling and assault.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...5E7583,00.html
Another site that discusses the actions of his brother.

http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/st...001032,00.html
discusses his brothers prior convictions - 2 for trafficking and one for
assault.

http://www.hinch.net/says_archive05/Nov05/18-11-05.htm
This gives details of the assault - khoa and almost 20 vietnamese were
involved in an assault on a smaller group of islander teenagers. Khoa
took to a 16yo with a machete, inflicting horrendous injuries.

So yes, in answer to your question, there are references!

David Smith wrote:
> Say NO! to drugs

Yep, whenever anyone asks "Can I have some of your drugs?" I say NO WAY!

ralph wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:28:20 +1030, Visualeyez This Marketing
> Solutions <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>I know which act of law will deter amature drug mules in the future..
>
>
> Good luck proving that bull****.
>
> Singapore has been murdering drug mules for years ... done **** all to
> deter anyone (maybe because Singapore banks keep financing drug lords
> to find new mules).

That maybe true.. but this particular incident was pushed across
Australian media pointing out the fact that the Singapore government
doesn't give a **** whether the convicted is Australian or not. If you
break the law... you are dead!
Hence, it will deter some...

Anyway... why are you so ****ing stubborn over this. Has your dealer put
up his prices due to Nguyen not making it home!!!

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:15:16 +1000, Graham Fountain <[email protected]> wrote:

>budgie wrote:
>> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:07:46 +1000, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> his brother was convicted of trafficking twice previously, the debt he
>>> accumulated was a byproduct of the associated criminal law case.
>>
>> Have you got a source for that?
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nguyen_Tuong_Van
>mentions that he did it to pay off his brothers legal debts.
>
>http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.a...001021,00.html
>says he did it to pay off the debts and mentions the brother had been
>convicted of heroin smuggling and assault.
>
>http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...5E7583,00.html
>Another site that discusses the actions of his brother.
>
>http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/st...001032,00.html
>discusses his brothers prior convictions - 2 for trafficking and one for
>assault.
>
>http://www.hinch.net/says_archive05/Nov05/18-11-05.htm
>This gives details of the assault - khoa and almost 20 vietnamese were
>involved in an assault on a smaller group of islander teenagers. Khoa
>took to a 16yo with a machete, inflicting horrendous injuries.
>
>So yes, in answer to your question, there are references!

I wasn't doubting you, but I hadn't seen any of that. Pity the media didn't get
beyond "gambling debts" in their recent coverage. I'd suspect a lot of the
bleeding hearts may have had a different position.

Since there's no evidence at all that he did it to help his brother,
(apart from the blind repetition of his story by the media) I'm gonna
let my courtroom-honed scepticism take that particular line with a large
grain of salt. To me, it looks like a blatant attempt to mitigate his
actions by making it look selfless....


budgie wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:15:16 +1000, Graham Fountain <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>budgie wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:07:46 +1000, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>his brother was convicted of trafficking twice previously, the debt he
>>>>accumulated was a byproduct of the associated criminal law case.
>>>
>>>Have you got a source for that?
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nguyen_Tuong_Van
>>mentions that he did it to pay off his brothers legal debts.
>>
>>http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.a...001021,00.html
>>says he did it to pay off the debts and mentions the brother had been
>>convicted of heroin smuggling and assault.
>>
>>http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...5E7583,00.html
>>Another site that discusses the actions of his brother.
>>
>>http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/st...001032,00.html
>>discusses his brothers prior convictions - 2 for trafficking and one for
>>assault.
>>
>>http://www.hinch.net/says_archive05/Nov05/18-11-05.htm
>>This gives details of the assault - khoa and almost 20 vietnamese were
>>involved in an assault on a smaller group of islander teenagers. Khoa
>>took to a 16yo with a machete, inflicting horrendous injuries.
>>
>>So yes, in answer to your question, there are references!
>
>
> I wasn't doubting you, but I hadn't seen any of that. Pity the media didn't get
> beyond "gambling debts" in their recent coverage. I'd suspect a lot of the
> bleeding hearts may have had a different position.

"Alice" <e@****anddie.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> David Smith wrote:
>> Say NO! to drugs
>
> Yep, whenever anyone asks "Can I have some of your drugs?" I say NO WAY!

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:29:55 +0800, budgie <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:15:16 +1000, Graham Fountain <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>budgie wrote:
>>> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:07:46 +1000, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>> his brother was convicted of trafficking twice previously, the debt he
>>>> accumulated was a byproduct of the associated criminal law case.
>>>
>>> Have you got a source for that?
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nguyen_Tuong_Van
>>mentions that he did it to pay off his brothers legal debts.
>>
>>http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.a...001021,00.html
>>says he did it to pay off the debts and mentions the brother had been
>>convicted of heroin smuggling and assault.
>>
>>http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...5E7583,00.html
>>Another site that discusses the actions of his brother.
>>
>>http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/st...001032,00.html
>>discusses his brothers prior convictions - 2 for trafficking and one for
>>assault.
>>
>>http://www.hinch.net/says_archive05/Nov05/18-11-05.htm
>>This gives details of the assault - khoa and almost 20 vietnamese were
>>involved in an assault on a smaller group of islander teenagers. Khoa
>>took to a 16yo with a machete, inflicting horrendous injuries.
>>
>>So yes, in answer to your question, there are references!
>
>I wasn't doubting you, but I hadn't seen any of that. Pity the media didn't get
>beyond "gambling debts" in their recent coverage. I'd suspect a lot of the
>bleeding hearts may have had a different position.

LOL ... what sort of retarded logic is that?

You are saying we're supposed to support capital punishment just
because the drug mule also happens to have a violent brother?

ralph <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:29:55 +0800, budgie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:15:16 +1000, Graham Fountain
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> budgie wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:07:46 +1000, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> his brother was convicted of trafficking twice previously, the
>>>>> debt he accumulated was a byproduct of the associated criminal
>>>>> law case.
>>>>
>>>> Have you got a source for that?
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nguyen_Tuong_Van
>>> mentions that he did it to pay off his brothers legal debts.
>>>
>>> http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.a...001021,00.html
>>> says he did it to pay off the debts and mentions the brother had
>>> been convicted of heroin smuggling and assault.
>>>
>>> http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...5E7583,00.html
>>> Another site that discusses the actions of his brother.
>>>
>>> http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/st...001032,00.html
>>> discusses his brothers prior convictions - 2 for trafficking and
>>> one for assault.
>>>
>>> http://www.hinch.net/says_archive05/Nov05/18-11-05.htm
>>> This gives details of the assault - khoa and almost 20 vietnamese
>>> were involved in an assault on a smaller group of islander
>>> teenagers. Khoa took to a 16yo with a machete, inflicting
>>> horrendous injuries.
>>>
>>> So yes, in answer to your question, there are references!
>>
>> I wasn't doubting you, but I hadn't seen any of that. Pity the
>> media didn't get beyond "gambling debts" in their recent coverage.
>> I'd suspect a lot of the bleeding hearts may have had a different
>> position.
>
> LOL ... what sort of retarded logic is that?
>
> You are saying we're supposed to support capital punishment just
> because the drug mule also happens to have a violent brother?

Nope, that he is unlikely to have done it to pay his brother's debts, stupid.

thegoons wrote:

> http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/n.../11/100028.php



That is the wrong thing to do...

First off why do the stupid idiots become addicts in the first
place creating a demand for drugs?

When in the hell are governments going to try abstinence based
programs and wean people off drugs and not just provide half
arsed measures to "deal with these issues?"