Pre-paid refund on porting out

Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
>> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
>> PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD COVERAGE
>> THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU BOUGHT THE
>> PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE AND FOUND THAT
>> IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>
> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?

Trivial to check that.

---

› See More: Pre-paid refund on porting out

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
>>> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
>>> PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD COVERAGE
>>> THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU BOUGHT THE
>>> PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE AND FOUND THAT
>>> IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>>
>> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?
>
> Trivial to check that.
>
....and if the dud handset was part of a package then you would also be
entitled to a refund, irrespective of whatever "Michael" or other Telstra
Shop dum****s may claim. The TIO and various fair trading/small claims
tribunals have ****ed Telstra over on these many times.


*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***

> > you aint guaranteed coverage in any one place at any time.
>
> No one ever said you were.
>
> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE
> GOOD COVERAGE IN A PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND
> THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD COVERAGE THERE,
> YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU
> BOUGHT THE PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF
> USING IT THERE AND FOUND THAT IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.

Nope. The coverage map clearly indicates, that coverage is subject to
limitations accordingly.

You have no recourse for coverage against the map

"Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
> > BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
> > PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD COVERAGE
> > THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU BOUGHT THE
> > PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE AND FOUND THAT IT
> > WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>
> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?

3 repair dockets are required before you will be let out of your contract
for "faulty handset"

>
> PD
>
> --
> Paul Day
> Web: http://www.enigma.id.au/

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:18:02 GMT, "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
>> > BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
>> > PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD COVERAGE
>> > THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU BOUGHT THE
>> > PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE AND FOUND THAT IT
>> > WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>>
>> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?
>
>3 repair dockets are required before you will be let out of your contract
>for "faulty handset"

Three repair dockets might be required before they will AGREE to
letting you out of your contract, but you're free to rescind it if
it's DOA (or after the first fault if that occurs within a relatively
short time of purchase).

thegoons <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
>>>> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
>>>> PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD
>>>> COVERAGE THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU
>>>> BOUGHT THE PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE
>>>> AND FOUND THAT IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>>>
>>> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?
>>
>> Trivial to check that.
>>
> ...and if the dud handset was part of a package then you would also be
> entitled to a refund, irrespective of whatever "Michael" or other
> Telstra Shop dum****s may claim. The TIO and various fair
> trading/small claims tribunals have ****ed Telstra over on these many
> times.

They have indeed.

Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
>>> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
>>> PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD COVERAGE
>>> THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU BOUGHT THE
>>> PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE AND FOUND THAT
>>> IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>>
>> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?

> 3 repair dockets are required before you will
> be let out of your contract for "faulty handset"

Wrong, as always.

No small claims court will buy that mindless bull****.

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:18:02 GMT, "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
> >> > BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
> >> > PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD COVERAGE
> >> > THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU BOUGHT THE
> >> > PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE AND FOUND THAT
IT
> >> > WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
> >>
> >> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?
> >
> >3 repair dockets are required before you will be let out of your contract
> >for "faulty handset"
>
> Three repair dockets might be required before they will AGREE to
> letting you out of your contract, but you're free to rescind it if
> it's DOA (or after the first fault if that occurs within a relatively
> short time of purchase).

No, DOA gets you a brand new handset, without repair, not out of your
contract. Do try and keep up.

Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> you aint guaranteed coverage in any one place at any time.
>>
>> No one ever said you were.
>>
>> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE
>> GOOD COVERAGE IN A PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND
>> THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD COVERAGE THERE,
>> YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU
>> BOUGHT THE PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF
>> USING IT THERE AND FOUND THAT IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.

> Nope.

Yep.

> The coverage map clearly indicates, that
> coverage is subject to limitations accordingly.

Pity about the small claims court and the TIO.

> You have no recourse for coverage against the map

Not a ****ing clue, as always.

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:27:29 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]
>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:18:02 GMT, "Michael" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
>>>>>> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
>>>>>> PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD
>>>>>> COVERAGE THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU
>>>>>> BOUGHT THE PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE
>>>>>> AND FOUND THAT IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>>>>>
>>>>> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?
>>>>
>>>> 3 repair dockets are required before you will be let out of your
>>>> contract for "faulty handset"
>>>
>>> Three repair dockets might be required before they will AGREE to
>>> letting you out of your contract, but you're free to rescind it if
>>> it's DOA (or after the first fault if that occurs within a relatively
>>> short time of purchase).
>>
>> No, DOA gets you a brand new handset,
>
>That's what Telstra wants. Pity the law says something totally different.
>
>> without repair, not out of your
>> contract. Do try and keep up.
>
>
>I think you are the one who is clearly struggling to keep up here, stupid.

And he's been struggling with this very same concept for several years
now.

"Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:18:02 GMT, "Michael" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
>>>>> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
>>>>> PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD
>>>>> COVERAGE THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU
>>>>> BOUGHT THE PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE
>>>>> AND FOUND THAT IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>>>>
>>>> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?
>>>
>>> 3 repair dockets are required before you will be let out of your
>>> contract for "faulty handset"
>>
>> Three repair dockets might be required before they will AGREE to
>> letting you out of your contract, but you're free to rescind it if
>> it's DOA (or after the first fault if that occurs within a relatively
>> short time of purchase).
>
> No, DOA gets you a brand new handset,

That's what Telstra wants. Pity the law says something totally different.

> without repair, not out of your
> contract. Do try and keep up.


I think you are the one who is clearly struggling to keep up here, stupid.


--
Kwyj

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:27:29 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:18:02 GMT, "Michael" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
>>>>>>> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE
>>>>>>> IN A PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD
>>>>>>> COVERAGE THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU
>>>>>>> BOUGHT THE PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE
>>>>>>> AND FOUND THAT IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?
>>>>>
>>>>> 3 repair dockets are required before you will be let out of your
>>>>> contract for "faulty handset"
>>>>
>>>> Three repair dockets might be required before they will AGREE to
>>>> letting you out of your contract, but you're free to rescind it if
>>>> it's DOA (or after the first fault if that occurs within a
>>>> relatively short time of purchase).
>>>
>>> No, DOA gets you a brand new handset,
>>
>> That's what Telstra wants. Pity the law says something totally
>> different.
>>
>>> without repair, not out of your
>>> contract. Do try and keep up.
>>
>>
>> I think you are the one who is clearly struggling to keep up here,
>> stupid.
>
> And he's been struggling with this very same concept for several years
> now.

Weren't you aware that the decisions of Telstra's legal department take
precedence over any Australian legislation?


--
Kwyj

"Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:18:02 GMT, "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >news:[email protected]...
>> >> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
>> >> > BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
>> >> > PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD COVERAGE
>> >> > THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU BOUGHT THE
>> >> > PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE AND FOUND THAT
> IT
>> >> > WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>> >>
>> >> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?
>> >
>> >3 repair dockets are required before you will be let out of your
>> >contract
>> >for "faulty handset"
>>
>> Three repair dockets might be required before they will AGREE to
>> letting you out of your contract, but you're free to rescind it if
>> it's DOA (or after the first fault if that occurs within a relatively
>> short time of purchase).
>
> No, DOA gets you a brand new handset, without repair, not out of your
> contract. Do try and keep up.
>
Pity if the TIO or consumer tribunal orders otherwise.


*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***

"Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>> > you aint guaranteed coverage in any one place at any time.
>>
>> No one ever said you were.
>>
>> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE
>> GOOD COVERAGE IN A PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND
>> THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD COVERAGE THERE,
>> YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU
>> BOUGHT THE PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF
>> USING IT THERE AND FOUND THAT IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>
> Nope. The coverage map clearly indicates, that coverage is subject to
> limitations accordingly.
>
> You have no recourse for coverage against the map
>
>
Wrong, otherwise they could shut down their whole network.


*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***

Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:18:02 GMT, "Michael" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> may have written:
>>>>> BUT IF THEIR COVERAGE MAPS CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE GOOD COVERAGE IN A
>>>>> PARTICULAR AREA AND YOU FIND THAT THERE IS NOT IN FACT GOOD
>>>>> COVERAGE THERE, YOU ARE INDEED ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND IF YOU
>>>>> BOUGHT THE PREPAID SERVICE WITH THE INTENTION OF USING IT THERE
>>>>> AND FOUND THAT IT WAS UNUSABLE THERE.
>>>>
>>>> What happens if it's due to a faulty handset?
>>>
>>> 3 repair dockets are required before you will be let out of your
>>> contract for "faulty handset"
>>
>> Three repair dockets might be required before they will AGREE to
>> letting you out of your contract, but you're free to rescind it if
>> it's DOA (or after the first fault if that occurs within a relatively
>> short time of purchase).
>
> No, DOA gets you a brand new handset, without repair, not out of your
> contract.

Pity about the law on that, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

> Do try and keep up.

You're the stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child that has never
ever had a ****ing clue about even the most basic consumer law.