Results 16 to 30 of 35
- 08-17-2006, 04:08 AM #16Rod SpeedGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
Michael <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>> thegoons <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Telstra couldn;t give a rats arse if ACMA monitor/audit them or
>>> not. ACMA have no power to demand Telstra improve coverage.
>> They do have the power to refuse to allow 3G on that band.
>>> Last time politicians tried to tame Trujillo,
>>> they received a one-fingered salute
>> The Mex got the one finger salute from govt, most obviously
>> with its attempt to shaft the competition with fibre to the node.
> not really.
Fraid so.
> telstra is happy to not build something that
> wont have a good commercial return.
The mex and his bum buddys are pissed that they couldnt monster
the ACCC into buying their attempt to shaft the competition.
> they make that decision every day, day in, day out
Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never
ever had a ****ing clue about anything at all, ever, and why you
only ever get to clean the dunnys and lick the Mex's shoes.
› See More: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
- 08-17-2006, 06:42 AM #17Intel InsideGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
The *real* auditors will be the end users. They will decry the 3G system if
its coverage is < the CDMA coverage.
And remember, there is an election coming next year so the Govt will listen
to any complaints.
"Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:rq%[email protected]...
>> "80 sites" in a country of this size is so laughable it's funny
>
> agreed
>
>
- 08-17-2006, 07:18 AM #18Paul DayGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:53:38 GMT Michael may have written:
> > Ok, hands up if you've _ever_ been able to place a CDMA call from
> > >200km away?
>
> me
Location/situation/evidence that it was to a cell over 200km away?
PD
--
Paul Day
Web: http://www.enigma.id.au/
- 08-17-2006, 07:28 AM #19MichaelGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
"Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The *real* auditors will be the end users. They will decry the 3G system
if
> its coverage is < the CDMA coverage.
3G already exists on GSM and they arent decrying it
> And remember, there is an election coming next year so the Govt will
listen
> to any complaints.
Crap****
- 08-17-2006, 01:44 PM #20Rod SpeedGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
Intel Inside <[email protected]> wrote
> The *real* auditors will be the end users. They will decry the 3G system if its
> coverage is < the CDMA coverage.
> And remember, there is an election coming next year so the Govt will listen to any
> complaints.
We'll see...
None of the hayseed electorates are at any risk now that One Notion
has passed its useby date very spectacularly indeed.
The election will be about interest rates and fuel prices, you watch.
> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>> Intel Inside <[email protected]> wrote
>>> "80 sites" in a country of this size is so laughable it's funny
>> agreed
- 08-17-2006, 05:04 PM #21Paul DayGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:42:52 GMT Intel Inside may have written:
> And remember, there is an election coming next year so the Govt will listen
> to any complaints.
Other than Alan Jones, I didn't think the Liberal Government listenned
to complaints at all?
PD
--
Paul Day
Web: http://www.enigma.id.au/
- 08-17-2006, 05:27 PM #22Rod SpeedGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote
> Intel Inside wrote
>> And remember, there is an election coming next
>> year so the Govt will listen to any complaints.
> Other than Alan Jones, I didn't think the Liberal
> Government listenned to complaints at all?
Corse they do when it isnt just the usual mindless whining.
You cant get reelected that often any other way.
- 08-18-2006, 01:39 AM #23AlbinusGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
Paul Day wrote:
> Other than Alan Jones, I didn't think the Liberal Government listenned
> to complaints at all?
You could even remove the "Liberal" part - the only people all political
parties seem to listen to are their financial donors.
- 08-18-2006, 03:09 AM #24EmjayeGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
Paul Day wrote:
> Ok, hands up if you've _ever_ been able to place a CDMA call from >200km
> away?
I have problems with cells only 10 kays away.
Case in point - Phillip Island, southern Victoria. Main town is Cowes. I
barely get a signal (1 maybe 2 bars). If I move to a wrong position, it
can cut out. Move 5 kays SE of Cowes to the race track. Get a full
signal.
Another; Corryong, NE Vic. Get a full signal in the town. Tintaldra, 20
km away, no coverage at all. Terrain around both regions, undulating to
flat.
- 08-18-2006, 04:49 AM #25thegoonsGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
"Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>> Large numbers of Telstra pre-paid subscribers also use the CDMA network.
>
> Nope
Wrong again as always. Pity about the market-flooding of prepaid handsets
like Nokia 2112
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
- 08-18-2006, 10:26 PM #26Intel InsideGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
I was taking into account the decommissioning of CDMA.
"Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> The *real* auditors will be the end users. They will decry the 3G system
> if
>> its coverage is < the CDMA coverage.
>
> 3G already exists on GSM and they arent decrying it
>
>> And remember, there is an election coming next year so the Govt will
> listen
>> to any complaints.
>
> Crap****
>
>
- 08-18-2006, 11:11 PM #27Rod SpeedGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
Intel Inside <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was taking into account the decommissioning of CDMA.
Still crap****.
> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>> Intel Inside <[email protected]> wrote
>>> The *real* auditors will be the end users. They will decry the 3G system if its
>>> coverage is < the CDMA coverage.
>> 3G already exists on GSM and they arent decrying it
>>> And remember, there is an election coming next year so the Govt will listen to any
>>> complaints.
>> Crap****
- 08-19-2006, 03:11 AM #28peterGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
"Emjaye" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Paul Day wrote:
>
>> Ok, hands up if you've _ever_ been able to place a CDMA call from >200km
>> away?
>
> I have problems with cells only 10 kays away.
>
> Case in point - Phillip Island, southern Victoria. Main town is Cowes. I
> barely get a signal (1 maybe 2 bars). If I move to a wrong position, it
> can cut out. Move 5 kays SE of Cowes to the race track. Get a full
> signal.
>
> Another; Corryong, NE Vic. Get a full signal in the town. Tintaldra, 20
> km away, no coverage at all. Terrain around both regions, undulating to
> flat.
>
As mentioned hundreds of times in this group. CDMA phones do not display
"signal strength" unlike GSM phones.
cheers
Peter
- 08-19-2006, 03:41 AM #29Intel InsideGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
And up your's Speed Rod
"Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I was taking into account the decommissioning of CDMA.
>
>
>
> "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> The *real* auditors will be the end users. They will decry the 3G
>>> system
>> if
>>> its coverage is < the CDMA coverage.
>>
>> 3G already exists on GSM and they arent decrying it
>>
>>> And remember, there is an election coming next year so the Govt will
>> listen
>>> to any complaints.
>>
>> Crap****
>>
>>
>
>
- 08-19-2006, 04:55 AM #30Rod SpeedGuest
Re: "Auditors to watch (Telstra) 3G (coverage compared to CDMA)"
Intel Inside <[email protected]> wrote
> And up your's Speed Rod
Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.
> "Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> I was taking into account the decommissioning of CDMA.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> The *real* auditors will be the end users. They will decry the 3G
>>>> system
>>> if
>>>> its coverage is < the CDMA coverage.
>>>
>>> 3G already exists on GSM and they arent decrying it
>>>
>>>> And remember, there is an election coming next year so the Govt
>>>> will listen to any complaints.
>>>
>>> Crap****
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.verizon
- Nextel
- Samsung
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
Top Used SUVs in 2024?
in Chit Chat