Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33
  1. #1
    Hello,
    I wanted a Nokia 1600, does Vodaphone lock these? Can i unlock it
    manually for free?




    See More: Vodaphone locks phones?




  2. #2
    Simon Templar
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    [email protected] wrote:
    > Hello,
    > I wanted a Nokia 1600, does Vodaphone lock these? Can i unlock it
    > manually for free?


    Learn how to *****. There is NO such thing as Vodaphone!!!!!!


    --
    The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
    belong to.

    73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
    <http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452>



  3. #3
    Kate
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    On Sat, 25 Kislev 5767 00:03 Simon Templar translated the ancient runes
    thusly:

    > [email protected] wrote:
    >> Hello,
    >> I wanted a Nokia 1600, does Vodaphone lock these? Can i unlock it
    >> manually for free?

    >
    > Learn how to *****. There is NO such thing as Vodaphone!!!!!!
    >

    Actually, he's right. It's Vodafone that can't *****!

    Kate vk4xyl
    --
    "Job tvoyjemadj!"
    -Obergefreiter Porta 27 Panzer Z.B.v



  4. #4
    kcoj
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    history lesson for the kiddies :-)
    Vodafone
    Vo ice + Da ta + Phone = Vodafone (fonically) ;-)
    Kate wrote:
    > On Sat, 25 Kislev 5767 00:03 Simon Templar translated the ancient runes
    > thusly:
    >
    >
    >>[email protected] wrote:
    >>
    >>>Hello,
    >>>I wanted a Nokia 1600, does Vodaphone lock these? Can i unlock it
    >>>manually for free?

    >>
    >>Learn how to *****. There is NO such thing as Vodaphone!!!!!!
    >>

    >
    > Actually, he's right. It's Vodafone that can't *****!
    >
    > Kate vk4xyl




  5. #5
    Kate
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    On Mon, 27 Kislev 5767 19:53 kcoj translated the ancient runes thusly:

    > history lesson for the kiddies :-)
    > Vodafone
    > Vo ice + Da ta + Phone = Vodafone (fonically) ;-)


    Umm if you put those together you get 'Vodaphone', and it's phonically. It's
    an annoying Seppo 'marketspeak' technique to replace the 'ph' with 'f' that
    is unfortuantely invading both the UK and Aus.

    Kate
    --
    "Job tvoyjemadj!"
    -Obergefreiter Porta 27 Panzer Z.B.v



  6. #6
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?


    "Kate" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Mon, 27 Kislev 5767 19:53 kcoj translated the ancient runes thusly:
    >
    >> history lesson for the kiddies :-)
    >> Vodafone
    >> Vo ice + Da ta + Phone = Vodafone (fonically) ;-)

    >
    > Umm if you put those together you get 'Vodaphone', and it's phonically.
    > It's
    > an annoying Seppo 'marketspeak' technique to replace the 'ph' with 'f'
    > that
    > is unfortuantely invading both the UK and Aus.


    Its not 'marketspeak', its their legal company name.

    THEY get to decide how to ***** it, because THEY own the company





  7. #7
    Kate
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    On Tue, 28 Kislev 5767 12:11 Michael translated the ancient runes thusly:

    >
    > "Kate" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> On Mon, 27 Kislev 5767 19:53 kcoj translated the ancient runes thusly:
    >>
    >>> history lesson for the kiddies :-)
    >>> Vodafone
    >>> Vo ice + Da ta + Phone = Vodafone (fonically) ;-)

    >>
    >> Umm if you put those together you get 'Vodaphone', and it's phonically.
    >> It's
    >> an annoying Seppo 'marketspeak' technique to replace the 'ph' with 'f'
    >> that
    >> is unfortuantely invading both the UK and Aus.

    >
    > Its not 'marketspeak', its their legal company name.
    >
    > THEY get to decide how to ***** it, because THEY own the company


    And they decided to use the marketspeak version as their company name, a
    typical corporate decision to mis***** a word. Just like 'Donut King' can't
    ***** 'doughnut'. Just because it's their legal name doesn't make it
    correct *****ing.

    Kate
    --
    "Job tvoyjemadj!"
    -Obergefreiter Porta 27 Panzer Z.B.v



  8. #8
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    >> Its not 'marketspeak', its their legal company name.
    >>
    >> THEY get to decide how to ***** it, because THEY own the company

    >
    > And they decided to use the marketspeak version as their company name, a
    > typical corporate decision to mis***** a word. Just like 'Donut King'
    > can't
    > ***** 'doughnut'. Just because it's their legal name doesn't make it
    > correct *****ing.


    By definition, it is.

    ****wit.





  9. #9
    Kate
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    On Fri, 1 Tevet 5767 06:03 Michael translated the ancient runes thusly:

    >>> Its not 'marketspeak', its their legal company name.
    >>>
    >>> THEY get to decide how to ***** it, because THEY own the company

    >>
    >> And they decided to use the marketspeak version as their company name, a
    >> typical corporate decision to mis***** a word. Just like 'Donut King'
    >> can't
    >> ***** 'doughnut'. Just because it's their legal name doesn't make it
    >> correct *****ing.

    >
    > By definition, it is.


    Not by the dictionary, it's not. Companies do not dictate *****ing, they can
    use whatever they like in their corporate logos, but the OED is still the
    definitive repository of correct *****ing.

    > ****wit.


    uh huh. A typical use of the classic 'ad hominem' response.

    Kate
    --
    "Job tvoyjemadj!"
    -Obergefreiter Porta 27 Panzer Z.B.v



  10. #10
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    Kate <[email protected]> wrote
    > Michael wrote


    >>>> Its not 'marketspeak', its their legal company name.


    >>>> THEY get to decide how to ***** it, because THEY own the company


    >>> And they decided to use the marketspeak version as their
    >>> company name, a typical corporate decision to mis***** a
    >>> word. Just like 'Donut King' can't ***** 'doughnut'. Just
    >>> because it's their legal name doesn't make it correct *****ing.


    >> By definition, it is.


    > Not by the dictionary, it's not.


    They are completely irrelevant to company names, ****wit.

    > Companies do not dictate *****ing,


    They do with how they ***** their name, ****wit.

    > they can use whatever they like in their corporate logos,


    And their name too, ****wit.

    > but the OED is still the definitive repository of correct *****ing.


    Not with company names it isnt, ****wit.

    Same with people's names too, ****wit.

    >> ****wit.


    > uh huh. A typical use of the classic 'ad hominem' response.


    It aint ad hominem, its completely accurate in your case, ****wit.





  11. #11
    Kate
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    On Fri, 1 Tevet 5767 11:57 Rod Speed translated the ancient runes thusly:

    > Kate <[email protected]> wrote
    >> Michael wrote

    >
    >>>>> Its not 'marketspeak', its their legal company name.

    >
    >>>>> THEY get to decide how to ***** it, because THEY own the company

    >
    >>>> And they decided to use the marketspeak version as their
    >>>> company name, a typical corporate decision to mis***** a
    >>>> word. Just like 'Donut King' can't ***** 'doughnut'. Just
    >>>> because it's their legal name doesn't make it correct *****ing.

    >
    >>> By definition, it is.

    >
    >> Not by the dictionary, it's not.

    >
    > They are completely irrelevant to company names, ****wit.


    That's what I said, dickhead.
    >
    >> Companies do not dictate *****ing,

    >
    > They do with how they ***** their name, ****wit.


    But they don't get their names out of the dictionary, dickhead.

    >> they can use whatever they like in their corporate logos,

    >
    > And their name too, ****wit.


    Which is what I said, dickhead.
    >
    >> but the OED is still the definitive repository of correct *****ing.

    >
    > Not with company names it isnt, ****wit.


    That's what I said, it's marketspeak, mis-*****ing deliberately to get the
    ****wits to buy their junk, dickhead.

    > Same with people's names too, ****wit.


    I'd noticed that dickhead.

    >>> ****wit.

    >
    >> uh huh. A typical use of the classic 'ad hominem' response.

    >
    > It aint ad hominem, its completely accurate in your case, ****wit.


    Nope, start losing an argument, attack the person by calling them names,
    dickhead.

    Now FROAD

    Kate
    --
    "Job tvoyjemadj!"
    -Obergefreiter Porta 27 Panzer Z.B.v



  12. #12
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    Kate <[email protected]> wrote
    > Rod Speed wrote
    >> Kate <[email protected]> wrote
    >>> Michael wrote


    >>>>>> Its not 'marketspeak', its their legal company name.


    >>>>>> THEY get to decide how to ***** it, because THEY own the company


    >>>>> And they decided to use the marketspeak version as their
    >>>>> company name, a typical corporate decision to mis***** a
    >>>>> word. Just like 'Donut King' can't ***** 'doughnut'. Just
    >>>>> because it's their legal name doesn't make it correct *****ing.


    >>>> By definition, it is.


    >>> Not by the dictionary, it's not.


    >> They are completely irrelevant to company names, ****wit.


    > That's what I said


    Lying, as always.

    And YOU brought up dictionarys, ****wit child.

    >>> Companies do not dictate *****ing,


    >> They do with how they ***** their name, ****wit.


    > But they don't get their names out of the dictionary


    Must be one of those rocket scientist ****wit children.

    >>> they can use whatever they like in their corporate logos,


    >> And their name too, ****wit.


    > Which is what I said


    Lying, as always.

    >>> but the OED is still the definitive repository of correct *****ing.


    >> Not with company names it isnt, ****wit.


    > That's what I said,


    Lying, as always.

    And YOU brought up dictionarys, ****wit child.

    > it's marketspeak, mis-*****ing deliberately
    > to get the ****wits to buy their junk


    Nope, so they get to have exclusivity with that *****ing, ****wit child.

    >> Same with people's names too, ****wit.


    > I'd noticed that


    Obvious lie.

    >>>> ****wit.


    >>> uh huh. A typical use of the classic 'ad hominem' response.


    >> It aint ad hominem, its completely accurate in your case, ****wit.


    > Nope, start losing an argument, attack the person by calling them names


    Nope, it aint ad hominem, its completely accurate in your case, ****wit child.

    > Now FROAD


    Any 2 year old could leave that for dead, ****wit child.





  13. #13
    Kate
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    On Fri, 1 Tevet 5767 19:38 Rod Speed translated the ancient runes thusly:

    <lotsa snip>
    >> Now FROAD

    >
    > Any 2 year old could leave that for dead, ****wit child.


    No doubt. Now please pay attention to my sig, ****wit child.

    Kate
    --
    "Job tvoyjemadj!"
    -Obergefreiter Porta 27 Panzer Z.B.v



  14. #14
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?

    Kate <[email protected]> wrote:
    > On Fri, 1 Tevet 5767 19:38 Rod Speed translated the ancient runes
    > thusly:
    >
    > <lotsa snip>
    >>> Now FROAD

    >>
    >> Any 2 year old could leave that for dead, ****wit child.

    >
    > No doubt. Now please pay attention to my sig


    Pathetic, really.





  15. #15
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: Vodaphone locks phones?


    "Kate" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Fri, 1 Tevet 5767 06:03 Michael translated the ancient runes thusly:
    >
    >>>> Its not 'marketspeak', its their legal company name.
    >>>>
    >>>> THEY get to decide how to ***** it, because THEY own the company
    >>>
    >>> And they decided to use the marketspeak version as their company name, a
    >>> typical corporate decision to mis***** a word. Just like 'Donut King'
    >>> can't
    >>> ***** 'doughnut'. Just because it's their legal name doesn't make it
    >>> correct *****ing.

    >>
    >> By definition, it is.

    >
    > Not by the dictionary, it's not. Companies do not dictate *****ing, they
    > can
    > use whatever they like in their corporate logos, but the OED is still the
    > definitive repository of correct *****ing.


    A company can call itself "hferuifhuiferuifhufrehfriue" - and by definition,
    that is the correct *****ing of their company name.

    Vodafone call themself "Vodafone" - and by definition, that is the correct
    *****ing of their company name.





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast