I hate the French

Rod Speed wrote:
> atec 77" <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com">
> wrote:
>> Alan Parkington wrote:
>>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>>
>>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their
>>> 'Mon Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>>
>>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the
>>> world?
>> it could be worse and they be other Euro trash like the dutch .
>
> Pseudokrauts in fact.
>
>
Bugga I hate agrement with you woddles

---

› See More: I hate the French

Clockmeister wrote:
> "atec 77" <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com"> wrote in message
> news:4679c303$0$1187$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their
>>>> 'Mon Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>>> When they produced the metric system.
>> nothng good about the metrication , gimmie ' and " anyday
>
> Yeah but your an idiot who's opinion can be completely ignored.
>
>
>
yea ?
is that the best you can do cloghead .

Rod Speed wrote:
> atec 77" <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com"> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>
>>>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>
>>>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon Dieus' at every
>>>> opportunity.
>
>>>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>
>>> When they produced the metric system.
>
>> nothng good about the metrication ,
>
> Wrong, as always.
>
>> gimmie ' and " anyday
>
> You dont qualify.
please explain woddles .
>
>

Stuart wrote:
> "Alan Parkington" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>
>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon
>> Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>
>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>>
>
> maybe if all countries walked around muttering and left the world to get on
> by it's self and not interfere we may all be better off...
>
>
That's not the human way though .

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Kwyjibo <[email protected]> wrote
>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Kwyjibo <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> will_s <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> Kwyjibo <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>>> Jon <[email protected]> wrote
>
>>>>>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in
>>>>>>>> tune with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest
>>>>>>>> of the world as their oyster - something to be exploited for
>>>>>>>> the benefit of the US and **** the rest of the world.
>
>>>>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>
>>>>>> Bull****.
>>>>>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>
>>>>> yep, we all know the poms came rushing down to save our bacon yet
>>>>> again rule Britannia
>
>>>> Most of us know that the Japanese had no intention of invading the
>>>> Australian mainland.........
>
>>> Easy to claim.
>
>> It sure is - Especially when there is absolutely no documentary
>> evidence to suggest that Japan planned any invasion of mainland
>> Australia and the senior Japanese said there were no such plans at
>> the end of the war.
>
> Irrelevant to what they would have done about Australia if the yanks
> had decided after Pearl Harbor that they didnt give a damn about
> that attack and that they didnt care enough about the Philipinnes etc
> to try to get it back after they had been booted out of there by the japs.
>

Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
yanks.
Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.


>> Try proving otherwise. You made the claim that we'd all have slitty eyes
>> if it wasn't for the yanks
>
> No I didnt.
>

Technically correct (for once). You claimed that *Jon* would have slitty
eyes if it wasn't for the yanks. A statement which you have so far failed to
back up with anything other than mindless 'if's.

>> - how about putting your money where your mouth is.
>
> You cant do that on that claim that they would
> have done nothing more than bomb Aust etc.
>
>>> You have absolutely no idea of what they would have done if
>
>> "IF"???
>
> Thats what was being discussed, what would have happened if the
> yanks had decided to not do anything about the Japs and Europe.
>

Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
yanks.
Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.

>>> the yanks had said after Pearl Harbour 'ok if you want SE Asia that bad,
>>> you can have it'
>
>> Pity that never happened, ****wit.
>
> Thats what the word IF is there for, you pathetic excuse for a lying
> bull**** artist.
>

Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
yanks.
Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.

>> Your hypotheticals are irrelevant. The reality is that Japan had no plans
>> to invade Australia.
>
> Irrelevant to what they would have done if the yanks had said after
> Pearl Harbour 'ok if you want SE Asia that bad, you can have it'
>

Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
yanks.
Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.

>>> Its unlikely that we would have done nothing if the yanks had chosen
>>> to ignore the japs and that would have ensured that the japs would have
>>> had to do something about us whatever their initial intentions with
>>> regard to australia might or might not have been.
>
>> If, if, if........
>> All irrelevant to what actually happened.
>
> What was being discussed was what would have happened IF
> the yanks had chosen to not **** over the Japs and the krauts.

Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
yanks.
Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.

--
Kwyj.

Kwyjibo <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>> Kwyjibo <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> Kwyjibo <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> will_s <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>> Kwyjibo <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>>>> Jon <[email protected]> wrote

>>>>>>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in
>>>>>>>>> tune with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest
>>>>>>>>> of the world as their oyster - something to be exploited for
>>>>>>>>> the benefit of the US and **** the rest of the world.

>>>>>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.

>>>>>>> Bull****.
>>>>>>> Get yourself a decent history book.

>>>>>> yep, we all know the poms came rushing down to save our bacon yet again rule Britannia

>>>>> Most of us know that the Japanese had no intention of invading the
>>>>> Australian mainland.........

>>>> Easy to claim.

>>> It sure is - Especially when there is absolutely no documentary
>>> evidence to suggest that Japan planned any invasion of mainland
>>> Australia and the senior Japanese said there were no such plans at
>>> the end of the war.

>> Irrelevant to what they would have done about Australia if the yanks
>> had decided after Pearl Harbor that they didnt give a damn about
>> that attack and that they didnt care enough about the Philipinnes etc
>> to try to get it back after they had been booted out of there by the japs.

> Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the yanks.

Nope. Absolutely relevant.

> Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.

Pity my original which you made such a spectacular fool
of yourself commenting on was always that, ****wit child.

>>> Try proving otherwise. You made the claim that we'd all have slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
>>> yanks

>> No I didnt.

> Technically correct (for once). You claimed that *Jon* would have slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
> yanks.

Must be one of those rocket scientist ****wit children.

> A statement which you have so far failed to back up with anything other than mindless 'if's.

Pity your **** is completely irrelevant to what would have
happened IF the yanks hadnt got involved, ****wit child.

"Don McKenzie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Alan Parkington wrote:
>
>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>
>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon
>> Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>
>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>
> <Basil Faulty's voice on>
>
> Well, they were able to get the Yanks to come and save them in two world
> wars for starters.
>
> <Basil Faulty's voice off>
>


I would just call that paying back a debt.

http://people.csail.mit.edu/sfelshin...ge/frhist.html



--
"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."
Don Hirschberg

Atheist Chaplain <[email protected]> wrote
> Don McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote
>> Alan Parkington wrote

>>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..

>>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon Dieus' at every
>>> opportunity.

>>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?

>> <Basil Faulty's voice on>

>> Well, they were able to get the Yanks to come and save them in two world wars for starters.

>> <Basil Faulty's voice off>

> I would just call that paying back a debt.

More fool you.

> http://people.csail.mit.edu/sfelshin...ge/frhist.html

Nothing like your mindlessly silly ****, and that radically overstates any purported 'debt' anyway.

Rod Speed wrote:
> imorf <[email protected]> wrote
>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>> Bull****.
>>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>> hmm, yes, I think it is unlikely Japan would have been able to invade and occupy mainland Aust
>> long term.
> How odd that they managed that fine right thruout SE
> Asia with population numbers that left ours for dead.

a lot of which were colonial possessions in which the Japanese may have
been viewed initially as liberators?
so the further distance wouldn't be a factor?
so the support from Canada and NZ and maybe India that would have arisen
wouldn't be a factor?

imorf <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> imorf <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote

>>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.

>>>> Bull****.

>>>> Get yourself a decent history book.

>>> hmm, yes, I think it is unlikely Japan would have been able to
>>> invade and occupy mainland Aust long term.

>> How odd that they managed that fine right thruout SE
>> Asia with population numbers that left ours for dead.

> a lot of which were colonial possessions in which the Japanese may have been viewed initially as
> liberators?

Have fun explaining China.

And we didnt see a lot of the colonys welcoming the japs with open arms either.

And those that were that stupid quickly worked out what the japs were about too.

> so the further distance wouldn't be a factor?

Not really, once you have to do it using naval forces, once they are on the
ships etc, it really doesnt make a lot of difference how far they have to go.

> so the support from Canada and NZ and maybe India that would have arisen wouldn't be a factor?

Nope, Canada wasnt in any position to do anything useful.

India was having enough trouble keeping the Japs from knocking them
off next and stopping that arsehole Ghandi from joining the Japs etc.

NZ is too small to have mattered a damn to the Japs.

Alan Parkington wrote:
> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>
> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon
> Dieus' at every opportunity.
>
> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?


Well, for one, they bred some really cute French backpacker girlies,
including the one who displayed to me an admirable ability for the
sexual act which bears her country's name some years back...:-)

Kwyjibo wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
>
>> You have absolutely no idea of what they would have done if
>
> "IF"???
>
>> the yanks
>> had said after Pearl Harbour 'ok if you want SE Asia that bad, you can
>> have it'
>
> Pity that never happened, ****wit.
> Your hypotheticals are irrelevant. The reality is that Japan had no plans to
> invade Australia.
SO why did they attack dawin and townsville ?
>

imorf wrote:
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Jon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in tune
>>>> with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest of the
>>>> world as their oyster - something to be exploited for the benefit of
>>>> the US and **** the rest of the world.
>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>>
>>
>> Bull****.
>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>>
> hmm, yes, I think it is unlikely Japan would have been able to invade
> and occupy mainland Aust long term.
The word is they had intended to get south to the townsville line though
and would ahve held it for some time .

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Jon <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in tune
>> with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest of the
>> world as their oyster - something to be exploited for the benefit of
>> the US and **** the rest of the world.
>
> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.

Australians will all have slitty eyes by the end of this century due to
unfettered migration from north of Oz

"Don McKenzie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Alan Parkington wrote:
>
>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>
>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon
>> Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>
>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>
> <Basil Faulty's voice on>
>
> Well, they were able to get the Yanks to come and save them in two world
> wars for starters.

But he septics almost left it too late as they didn't join the allies in WW1
until a year before it finished and were almost 3 years late for WW2.