Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 53
  1. #16
    Friday
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted

    Jeßus wrote:
    > Peter wrote:
    >>> Peter,
    >>>
    >>> your comments are inconsistent.

    >
    > Indeed...
    >
    > <snip>
    >
    >> I wish that thank ALL that have replied. Let me try to paint a clearer
    >> picture for you all. I work as a window cleaner and often find myself
    >> having to pass in front of these towers and also rig my ropes past
    >> them. I do not work with the towers but have been an industry leader
    >> in trying to raise the awareness of the hazards from RF transmission.

    >
    > So...
    > You're an "industry leader in trying to raise the awareness of the
    > hazards from RF transmission" and yet here you are asking very basic
    > questions to which you must surely already know the answers to if you
    > are indeed an 'industry leader'. How can you possibly be advising anyone
    > on this subject within your industry if you don't even know the facts,
    > or have direct access to solid and verifable information?
    >
    >> I can tell you with over 15 years industry experience I have never
    >> seen anybody
    > > in my industry with a RF meter and when I talk about this people look

    > at me like I am silly.
    >
    > The same thing has happened here, hasnt it?
    >
    > Fair enough, you're concerned about RF - but maybe you need to think
    > twice about what you say... or perhaps how you say it.
    >
    > FWIW, I don't know of any cheap, reliable and accurate RF meter.
    >


    Give the guy a break, at least he's making an effort to do the right
    thing. I'd suggest a microwave oven leakage detector would probably do
    the job, since you're looking at similar frequencies. Farnell or Jaycar
    probably have a very cheap kit available which wouldn't be too hard to
    build.

    Friday



    See More: RF Meters - Cross posted




  2. #17
    Peter
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted


    >>>>
    >>>> your comments are inconsistent.

    >>
    >> Indeed...
    >>
    >> <snip>
    >>
    >>> I wish that thank ALL that have replied. Let me try to paint a
    >>> clearer picture for you all. I work as a window cleaner and often
    >>> find myself having to pass in front of these towers and also rig my
    >>> ropes past them. I do not work with the towers but have been an
    >>> industry leader in trying to raise the awareness of the hazards from
    >>> RF transmission.

    >>
    >> So...
    >> You're an "industry leader in trying to raise the awareness of the
    >> hazards from RF transmission" and yet here you are asking very basic
    >> questions to which you must surely already know the answers to if you
    >> are indeed an 'industry leader'. How can you possibly be advising
    >> anyone on this subject within your industry if you don't even know
    >> the facts, or have direct access to solid and verifable information?



    shows how slow my industry is.
    doesn't hurt to ask.


    >>
    >>> I can tell you with over 15 years industry experience I have never
    >>> seen anybody
    >> > in my industry with a RF meter and when I talk about this people
    >> > look

    >> at me like I am silly.
    >>
    >> The same thing has happened here, hasnt it?



    Yes, sad isn't it.



    >>
    >> Fair enough, you're concerned about RF - but maybe you need to think
    >> twice about what you say... or perhaps how you say it.



    Why? I may not get an answer from you but someone else may help.


    >>
    >> FWIW, I don't know of any cheap, reliable and accurate RF meter.
    >>

    >



    Well your no help.



    > Give the guy a break, at least he's making an effort to do the right
    > thing. I'd suggest a microwave oven leakage detector would probably do
    > the job, since you're looking at similar frequencies. Farnell or
    > Jaycar probably have a very cheap kit available which wouldn't be too
    > hard to build.
    >



    Thanks



  3. #18
    Dan N
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted

    On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:27:15 +0000, unknown wrote:

    > If you don't want to accept expertise, perhaps it's time you gained some
    > yourself ?


    Give the guy a break. That appears to be exactly what he's trying to do.

    Dan



  4. #19
    Dan N
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted

    On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:40:59 +1000, Phil Allison wrote:

    > ** Just as mad a thing to say as the first time you dribbled it out.


    So you ARE related to Rod Speed.

    Dan



  5. #20
    Phil Allison
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted


    "Dan N"

    >
    >> If you don't want to accept expertise, perhaps it's time you gained some
    >> yourself ?

    >
    > Give the guy a break. That appears to be exactly what he's trying to do.
    >



    ** What bollocks.

    The demented fool has ignored all advice, refused to answer questions and is
    insisting someone to provide him with the impossible.

    Do you give singing lessons o pigs - maybe ?



    ....... Phil





  6. #21
    atec 77
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted

    Dan N wrote:
    > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:40:59 +1000, Phil Allison wrote:
    >
    >> ** Just as mad a thing to say as the first time you dribbled it out.

    >
    > So you ARE related to Rod Speed.
    >
    > Dan
    >

    Only retaly



  7. #22
    Dan N
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted

    On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:30:41 +1000, Phil Allison wrote:

    > ** What bollocks.


    I just don't get it. Some guy comes in asking questions, obviously
    someone not very knowledgeable, and everyone jumps on him. I guess they
    just like to feel superior.

    Dan



  8. #23
    Peter
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted


    >
    > The Nardalert XT or Radman XT is what you want, don't dick around with
    > anything else.
    >
    > If you don't use it that often, you can even hire one:
    > http://www.allara.com.au/productinfo.aspx?prodid=67
    >



    I would like to know your thoughts about this device,

    http://www.rsaustralia.com

    Item number 129-189

    TIA

    :-P




  9. #24
    kreed
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted

    On Jun 23, 12:49 pm, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >>>> your comments are inconsistent.

    >
    > >> Indeed...

    >
    > >> <snip>

    >
    > >>> I wish that thank ALL that have replied. Let me try to paint a
    > >>> clearer picture for you all. I work as a window cleaner and often
    > >>> find myself having to pass in front of these towers and also rig my
    > >>> ropes past them. I do not work with the towers but have been an
    > >>> industry leader in trying to raise the awareness of the hazards from
    > >>> RF transmission.

    >
    > >> So...
    > >> You're an "industry leader in trying to raise the awareness of the
    > >> hazards from RF transmission" and yet here you are asking very basic
    > >> questions to which you must surely already know the answers to if you
    > >> are indeed an 'industry leader'. How can you possibly be advising
    > >> anyone on this subject within your industry if you don't even know
    > >> the facts, or have direct access to solid and verifable information?

    >
    > shows how slow my industry is.
    > doesn't hurt to ask.
    >
    >
    >
    > >>> I can tell you with over 15 years industry experience I have never
    > >>> seen anybody
    > >> > in my industry with a RF meter and when I talk about this people
    > >> > look
    > >> at me like I am silly.

    >
    > >> The same thing has happened here, hasnt it?

    >
    > Yes, sad isn't it.
    >
    >
    >
    > >> Fair enough, you're concerned about RF - but maybe you need to think
    > >> twice about what you say... or perhaps how you say it.

    >
    > Why? I may not get an answer from you but someone else may help.
    >
    >
    >
    > >> FWIW, I don't know of any cheap, reliable and accurate RF meter.

    >
    > Well your no help.
    >
    > > Give the guy a break, at least he's making an effort to do the right
    > > thing. I'd suggest a microwave oven leakage detector would probably do
    > > the job, since you're looking at similar frequencies. Farnell or
    > > Jaycar probably have a very cheap kit available which wouldn't be too
    > > hard to build.

    >
    > Thanks


    At the end of the day, if you feel that strongly about it, you need to
    "bite the bullet" and consider the purchase, or rental of the
    instrument that is needed, take it to your workplace(s) when the
    towers are on, and measure the strength of the signal in and around
    the area(s) you work. If they are over the safe limits, then you have
    a problem.

    For safety, I would turn on and observe the meter as you approach the
    site in question, rather than getting there and turning it on then.

    You can use these microwave detectors, but there is no guarantee that
    they are going to pick up all the frequencies or bands that may be
    being broadcast from all the towers (or individial antennas) at the
    worksites. If you can rent the professional instrument, and take the
    microwave detector kit with you, and see if and at what levels
    responds and its readings, it may give you a more reliable indication.
    If you walk up with a microwave leakage detector, it may or may not
    indicate a signal, and you may not know whether the signal level it
    indicates is dangerous or not.


    Otherwise you are stuck with putting aluminium foil around your balls,
    and hoping for the best.




  10. #25
    David L. Jones
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted

    On Jun 25, 7:53 pm, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
    > > The Nardalert XT or Radman XT is what you want, don't dick around with
    > > anything else.

    >
    > > If you don't use it that often, you can even hire one:
    > >http://www.allara.com.au/productinfo.aspx?prodid=67

    >
    > I would like to know your thoughts about this device,
    >
    > http://www.rsaustralia.com
    >
    > Item number 129-189


    Fantastic, if you plan on cleaning the windows of the Lucas Heights
    Nuclear Reactor.

    Dave.




  11. #26
    Peter
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted



    It is sad isnt it.
    Though I dont see Phil's responses as he made it to my kill file a while
    back.

    :-P



  12. #27
    Phil Allison
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted


    "Dan Nut Case Troll Lover "


    ** Go drop dead


    you asinine ****wit TROLL lover !!




    ........ Phil






  13. #28
    Phil Allison
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted


    "Peter"

    > Though I dont see Phil's responses as he made it to my kill file a while
    > back.



    ** Good.

    Then I can enjoy calling the pathetic pile of ASD ****ed **** anything I
    like.




    ....... Phil








  14. #29
    Peter
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted

    Thanks guys, point taken.
    BTW, I dont care if you think I am a troll Walt Davidson.
    :-P



  15. #30
    Peter
    Guest

    Re: RF Meters - Cross posted

    Thanks
    :-P



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast