Earn by Ads on Mobile for free

"u will not be charged single
rupees" - says it all...

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I am working in software company ...while looking in Google I have
> found a new web site were we can earn money for receiving sms on our
> cell phone...yes its true just for reading sms ads on our cell phone
> we will be payed money.....all we need to do is to do free
> registration to our mobile number in this web site......remember
> registration free of cost....u will not be charged single
> rupees.....just log on to this link and start earning money
> http://earnbyads.co.in/PI1.aspx?RC=afa9dc40
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

---

› See More: Earn by Ads on Mobile for free

thegoons wrote:
> "u will not be charged single
> rupees" - says it all...

Curry in a Hurry? Bloody SPAMMERS!


--
The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
<http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452>

"Simon Templar" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> thegoons wrote:
>> "u will not be charged single
>> rupees" - says it all...
>
> Curry in a Hurry? Bloody SPAMMERS!
>
>

Got your fridge magnet handy?

> --
> The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
> belong to.
>
> 73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
> <http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dan Anos wrote:
> I've heard of another affiliate SMS scheme at www.freebiesms.co.uk for
> sending SMS? any ideas about this one?

Several things to consider with so called free SMS sites. One is the
can't or won't guarantee the service, if it busy it will either be
delayed or maybe even just drop the message.

Also privacy is an issue, what are they going to do with your details?
They have to make money somehow to pay for those SMS's. Are they going
to SPAM your phone or the people you send messages to? Or are they
going flog number and the people you send messages to those Premium SMS
scammers?


--
The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
<http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452>

Simon Templar wrote...

>Several things to consider with so called free SMS sites. One is the
>can't or won't guarantee the service,

Just like the mainstream telcos who charge up to 50 cents or more a
message, hey?


--
Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others.- Groucho Marx

"Marts" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Simon Templar wrote...
>
>>Several things to consider with so called free SMS sites. One is the
>>can't or won't guarantee the service,
>
> Just like the mainstream telcos who charge up to 50 cents or more a
> message, hey?

I've yet to meet an Aus telco that charges 50c for a SMS, perhaps you could
enlighten me?
>
>
> --
> Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others.- Groucho
> Marx

Michael J wrote...

> I've yet to meet an Aus telco that charges 50c for a SMS, perhaps you could
> enlighten me?

That's what Telstra charges me for MMSes. I was refering to all types of "short
messages", not just text ones.

Perhaps I should have said "up to 50 cents"...


--
I must confess, I was born at a very early age. - Groucho Marx

"Marts" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael J wrote...
>
>> I've yet to meet an Aus telco that charges 50c for a SMS, perhaps you
>> could
>> enlighten me?
>
> That's what Telstra charges me for MMSes. I was refering to all types of
> "short
> messages", not just text ones.

Naughty.
An MMS is not a short message

> Perhaps I should have said "up to 50 cents"...

SMS up to 25c.
>
>
> --
> I must confess, I was born at a very early age. - Groucho Marx

Michael J wrote:

> "Marts" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Michael J wrote...
>>
>>> I've yet to meet an Aus telco that charges 50c for a SMS,
>>> perhaps you could enlighten me?
>>
>> That's what Telstra charges me for MMSes. I was refering to
>> all types of "short
>> messages", not just text ones.
>
> Naughty.
> An MMS is not a short message
>
>> Perhaps I should have said "up to 50 cents"...
>
> SMS up to 25c.

Try 50¢.

From
http://www.telstra.com.au/telstrapre...ates/index.htm

"International text messages (International SMS) per 160
character message sent to each recipient: 50¢ per message sent
per recipient".

Telstra is an Australian telco, and an international SMS is an
SMS.

John

"John Henderson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael J wrote:
>
>> "Marts" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Michael J wrote...
>>>
>>>> I've yet to meet an Aus telco that charges 50c for a SMS,
>>>> perhaps you could enlighten me?
>>>
>>> That's what Telstra charges me for MMSes. I was refering to
>>> all types of "short
>>> messages", not just text ones.
>>
>> Naughty.
>> An MMS is not a short message
>>
>>> Perhaps I should have said "up to 50 cents"...
>>
>> SMS up to 25c.
>
> Try 50¢.
>
> From
> http://www.telstra.com.au/telstrapre...ates/index.htm
>
> "International text messages (International SMS) per 160
> character message sent to each recipient: 50¢ per message sent
> per recipient".
>
> Telstra is an Australian telco, and an international SMS is an
> SMS.

Semantics.

An MMS is not an SMS, and an international SMS is not considered a normal
SMS by most people.


>
> John

Michael J wrote:

> An MMS is not an SMS, and an international SMS is not
> considered a normal SMS by most people.

Then "most people" would be wrong about that, if they actually
thought that way at all. And why suddenly restrict the topic
to domestic traffic?

QED

John

"John Henderson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael J wrote:
>
>> An MMS is not an SMS, and an international SMS is not
>> considered a normal SMS by most people.
>
> Then "most people" would be wrong about that, if they actually
> thought that way at all. And why suddenly restrict the topic
> to domestic traffic?

Because thats what we were discussing, ****wit

>
> QED
>
> John

Sounds like a novel way to make some decent money provided the person works hard and is consistent

Michael J wrote:

> Because thats what we were discussing, ****wit

Your comprehension skills are as wanting as is your grace in
defeat.

John