What is wrong with Next G?

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> mattic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> mattic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> davmel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> James Bell wrote:
>>>>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>> Only a ****wit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>>>>> month
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this 1975 again you ****WIT? How the **** can anybody justify
>>>>>>> ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being excessive in
>>>>>>> cost. ROFL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh quit whining you little child. If you don't like the prices
>>>>>> then build your own network or wait a long time before a
>>>>>> competitor bothers to build a network with adequate coverage.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or just notice that Opel will be available soon. Too much for you
>>>>> tho.
>>>
>>>> I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface.
>>>
>>> More fool you.
>>>
>>>> This is a "company" that doesn't exist.
>>>
>>> It will.
>>>
>>>> There's no CEO, no staff, no premises,
>>>
>>> There will be.
>>>
>>>> they don't even have a ****ing carrier licence ffs!
>>>
>>> They dont need one and if they do, they'll get one.
>>>
>>>> Waltzing up to the Government and threatening to pull out of
>>>> Australia unless Optus gets the billion bucks
>>>
>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>
>>> The govt put that up for tender and both Optarse and Telstra put in
>>> bids, ****wit.
>>>
>>> Telstra's was deliberately non compliant.
>>>
>>>> was a measured ploy by SingTel and maybe not so far from the truth
>>>> given the woeful performance of
>>>> Optus compared to other off-shore SingTel concerns.
>>>
>>> Bare faced pig ignorant lie with their mobile service.
>>>
>>>> Of course, what WILL happen is O'Sullivan will sidle up again and
>>>> say, "Look guys, this is a compete ****-up, it's going to fail and
>>>> you'll look really stupid. Unless, of course, you stump up another
>>>> billion; and another."
>>>
>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>
>>> And it would STILL be much better to have real competition in rural
>>> areas so the consumers who cant get anything else are shafted with
>>> NextG utterly obscene data charges for any viable volume ANYWAY.
>>>
>>> After all, that money is only a tiny part of what the govt got when
>>> it flogged off telstra and its hilarious that that is being used to
>>> give telstra the shafting with a telephone pole that it so richly
>>> deserves. I bet which ever shinybum dreamt that one up is still wetting
>>> its
>>> pants laughing.
>>
>> I always think
>
> Obvious lie. Ear to ear dog **** isnt capable of thought.

Excellent. I'm closing in.

---

› See More: What is wrong with Next G?

mattic <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> mattic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> mattic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> davmel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> James Bell wrote:
>>>>>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Only a ****wit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>>>>>> month
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is this 1975 again you ****WIT? How the **** can anybody
>>>>>>>> justify ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being
>>>>>>>> excessive in cost. ROFL.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh quit whining you little child. If you don't like the prices
>>>>>>> then build your own network or wait a long time before a
>>>>>>> competitor bothers to build a network with adequate coverage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or just notice that Opel will be available soon. Too much for you
>>>>>> tho.
>>>>
>>>>> I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface.
>>>>
>>>> More fool you.
>>>>
>>>>> This is a "company" that doesn't exist.
>>>>
>>>> It will.
>>>>
>>>>> There's no CEO, no staff, no premises,
>>>>
>>>> There will be.
>>>>
>>>>> they don't even have a ****ing carrier licence ffs!
>>>>
>>>> They dont need one and if they do, they'll get one.
>>>>
>>>>> Waltzing up to the Government and threatening to pull out of
>>>>> Australia unless Optus gets the billion bucks
>>>>
>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>
>>>> The govt put that up for tender and both Optarse and Telstra put in
>>>> bids, ****wit.
>>>>
>>>> Telstra's was deliberately non compliant.
>>>>
>>>>> was a measured ploy by SingTel and maybe not so far from the truth
>>>>> given the woeful performance of
>>>>> Optus compared to other off-shore SingTel concerns.
>>>>
>>>> Bare faced pig ignorant lie with their mobile service.
>>>>
>>>>> Of course, what WILL happen is O'Sullivan will sidle up again and
>>>>> say, "Look guys, this is a compete ****-up, it's going to fail and
>>>>> you'll look really stupid. Unless, of course, you stump up another
>>>>> billion; and another."
>>>>
>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>
>>>> And it would STILL be much better to have real competition in rural
>>>> areas so the consumers who cant get anything else are shafted with
>>>> NextG utterly obscene data charges for any viable volume ANYWAY.
>>>>
>>>> After all, that money is only a tiny part of what the govt got when
>>>> it flogged off telstra and its hilarious that that is being used to
>>>> give telstra the shafting with a telephone pole that it so richly
>>>> deserves. I bet which ever shinybum dreamt that one up is still
>>>> wetting its
>>>> pants laughing.
>>>
>>> I always think
>>
>> Obvious lie. Ear to ear dog **** isnt capable of thought.
>
> Excellent. I'm closing in.

The only thing thats closing in is your head up your lard arse, as always.

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> mattic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> mattic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> mattic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>> davmel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> James Bell wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Only a ****wit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>>>>>>> month
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this 1975 again you ****WIT? How the **** can anybody
>>>>>>>>> justify ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being
>>>>>>>>> excessive in cost. ROFL.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh quit whining you little child. If you don't like the prices
>>>>>>>> then build your own network or wait a long time before a
>>>>>>>> competitor bothers to build a network with adequate coverage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or just notice that Opel will be available soon. Too much for you
>>>>>>> tho.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface.
>>>>>
>>>>> More fool you.
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a "company" that doesn't exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> It will.
>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no CEO, no staff, no premises,
>>>>>
>>>>> There will be.
>>>>>
>>>>>> they don't even have a ****ing carrier licence ffs!
>>>>>
>>>>> They dont need one and if they do, they'll get one.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Waltzing up to the Government and threatening to pull out of
>>>>>> Australia unless Optus gets the billion bucks
>>>>>
>>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>>
>>>>> The govt put that up for tender and both Optarse and Telstra put in
>>>>> bids, ****wit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Telstra's was deliberately non compliant.
>>>>>
>>>>>> was a measured ploy by SingTel and maybe not so far from the truth
>>>>>> given the woeful performance of
>>>>>> Optus compared to other off-shore SingTel concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bare faced pig ignorant lie with their mobile service.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, what WILL happen is O'Sullivan will sidle up again and
>>>>>> say, "Look guys, this is a compete ****-up, it's going to fail and
>>>>>> you'll look really stupid. Unless, of course, you stump up another
>>>>>> billion; and another."
>>>>>
>>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>>
>>>>> And it would STILL be much better to have real competition in rural
>>>>> areas so the consumers who cant get anything else are shafted with
>>>>> NextG utterly obscene data charges for any viable volume ANYWAY.
>>>>>
>>>>> After all, that money is only a tiny part of what the govt got when
>>>>> it flogged off telstra and its hilarious that that is being used to
>>>>> give telstra the shafting with a telephone pole that it so richly
>>>>> deserves. I bet which ever shinybum dreamt that one up is still
>>>>> wetting its
>>>>> pants laughing.
>>>>
>>>> I always think
>>>
>>> Obvious lie. Ear to ear dog **** isnt capable of thought.
>>
>> Excellent. I'm closing in.
>
> The only thing thats closing in is your head up your lard arse, as always.

Poor Rod! Not a good dissembler.

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "mattic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> Only a fool would use NextG for data of any volume.
>>>
>>> Precisely.
>> only a fool would use NextG without a data pack for any volume
>>
>> for anyone else, NextG is very suitable
>
> Wrong. The data charges are STILL utterly obscene even with the data
> packs.

maybe for pensioners like you
>
>

>>> One real area of concern is that of health services. It is difficult
>>> to entice
>>> doctors out of the larger cities, mainly because the opportunity to
>>> make big
>>> bucks isn't there. So, what we see are lots of "foreign trained"
>>> doctors bein
>>
>> Supply and demand, give more dollars
>> Increase medicare rebate in that area if necessary
>
> It aint about the money.

Of course it is, Rod ****er. Youd find you would have all the doctors you
need and more, if they were all on a wage of $500k (example)

Michael <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>>> mattic <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote

>>>>> Only a fool would use NextG for data of any volume.

>>>> Precisely.

>> only a fool would use NextG without a data pack for any volume

>>> for anyone else, NextG is very suitable

>> Wrong. The data charges are STILL utterly obscene even with the data packs.

> maybe for pensioners like you

Not a pensioner, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

Michael <[email protected]> wrote:

>>>> One real area of concern is that of health services. It is difficult to entice
>>>> doctors out of the larger cities, mainly because the opportunity to make big
>>>> bucks isn't there. So, what we see are lots of "foreign trained" doctors bein

>>> Supply and demand, give more dollars
>>> Increase medicare rebate in that area if necessary

>> It aint about the money.

> Of course it is

Nope.

> Youd find you would have all the doctors you need and more, if they were all on a wage of $500k (example)

Have fun explaining the specialists who are on that sort of income, who
arent interested in going there, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

Mine flys in and out every week, literally. He's an ex south african
jew and there are no synagogs here, and he wants his kids to go
to jewish private schools and there aint none of those here either.

One hell of a way to 'live' and there are plenty of others who arent
interested in that sort of lifestyle, even at that sort of income per year.

As always, you have never ever had a ****ing clue about anything at all, ever.

Rod Speed wrote...

> > Youd find you would have all the doctors you need and more, if they were all on a wage of $500k (example)
>
> Have fun explaining the specialists who are on that sort of income, who
> arent interested in going there, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

Maybe because they earn their dough from city practices and wouldn't get it if
they had practices outside of the rural areas. That's why they're not interested
in setting up shop outside of the cities, except as a once in a blue moon visit.

Marts <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote

>>> Youd find you would have all the doctors you need and
>>> more, if they were all on a wage of $500k (example)

>> Have fun explaining the specialists who are on that sort of income, who
>> arent interested in going there, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

> Maybe because they earn their dough from city practices and
> wouldn't get it if they had practices outside of the rural areas.
> That's why they're not interested in setting up shop outside
> of the cities, except as a once in a blue moon visit.

This one flys in every week and spends the whole
week here, just goes home on the weekends.

He just commutes from Sydney because that works
better for his family and his own weekend activitys.

It isnt even that expensive, $250 a week.

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> mattic <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote
>
>>>>>> Only a fool would use NextG for data of any volume.
>
>>>>> Precisely.
>
>>> only a fool would use NextG without a data pack for any volume
>
>>>> for anyone else, NextG is very suitable
>
>>> Wrong. The data charges are STILL utterly obscene even with the data
>>> packs.
>
>> maybe for pensioners like you
>
> Not a pensioner, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

heh.

>
>

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>>> One real area of concern is that of health services. It is difficult
>>>>> to entice
>>>>> doctors out of the larger cities, mainly because the opportunity to
>>>>> make big
>>>>> bucks isn't there. So, what we see are lots of "foreign trained"
>>>>> doctors bein
>
>>>> Supply and demand, give more dollars
>>>> Increase medicare rebate in that area if necessary
>
>>> It aint about the money.
>
>> Of course it is
>
> Nope.
>
>> Youd find you would have all the doctors you need and more, if they were
>> all on a wage of $500k (example)
>
> Have fun explaining the specialists who are on that sort of income, who
> arent interested in going there, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.
>
> Mine flys in and out every week, literally. He's an ex south african
> jew and there are no synagogs here, and he wants his kids to go
> to jewish private schools and there aint none of those here either.

thats his problem

Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> One real area of concern is that of health services. It is
>>>>>> difficult to entice
>>>>>> doctors out of the larger cities, mainly because the opportunity
>>>>>> to make big
>>>>>> bucks isn't there. So, what we see are lots of "foreign trained"
>>>>>> doctors bein
>>
>>>>> Supply and demand, give more dollars
>>>>> Increase medicare rebate in that area if necessary
>>
>>>> It aint about the money.
>>
>>> Of course it is
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>>> Youd find you would have all the doctors you need and more, if they
>>> were all on a wage of $500k (example)
>>
>> Have fun explaining the specialists who are on that sort of income,
>> who arent interested in going there, you stupid dunny cleaning
>> ****wit child. Mine flys in and out every week, literally. He's an ex south african
>> jew and there are no synagogs here, and he wants his kids to go
>> to jewish private schools and there aint none of those here either.
>
> thats his problem

Irrelevant to your mindlessly silly claim about how to fix that problem.