Nokia's Updated N95 for North America

The original Nokia N95 was a very high profile handset because it
offered most every feature available in a mobile phone at the time...

http://latest-mob-phones.blogspot.com/

---

› See More: Nokia's Updated N95 for North America

[email protected] writes:

>The original Nokia N95 was a very high profile handset because it
>offered most every feature available in a mobile phone at the time...

>http://latest-mob-phones.blogspot.com/

This is Australia you f-wit!

--
Bethany Ryan - ORBnet Bounty Hunter - Seeking and Killing spammers and scammers
Supporting products such as the Body Bouncer at http://www.bodybouncer.com -
the Fleshlight at http://www.fleshlightuk.com - Home-Made Sex Toys for you at
http://www.homemade-sex-toys.com - my site http://lios.apana.org.au/~bethanybb

Bethany Ryan wrote:
> [email protected] writes:
>
>> The original Nokia N95 was a very high profile handset because it
>> offered most every feature available in a mobile phone at the time...
>
>> http://latest-mob-phones.blogspot.com/
>
> This is Australia you f-wit!

And if you weren't such an ignorant f-wit you would know that the UMTS
850 North American Nokia N95 variant will be released here is Australia
next month by Telstra.
You won't just be able to use the HSDPA capability of the N95 within a
small radius of our capital cities like the original N95 but over the
full coverage area of Next G.

"davmel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Bethany Ryan wrote:
>> [email protected] writes:
>>
>>> The original Nokia N95 was a very high profile handset because it
>>> offered most every feature available in a mobile phone at the time...
>>
>>> http://latest-mob-phones.blogspot.com/
>>
>> This is Australia you f-wit!
>
> And if you weren't such an ignorant f-wit you would know that the UMTS 850
> North American Nokia N95 variant will be released here is Australia next
> month by Telstra.
> You won't just be able to use the HSDPA capability of the N95 within a
> small radius of our capital cities like the original N95 but over the full
> coverage area of Next G.


Where is this "will be released here is Australia next month by Telstra."
stated/announced Oh wise one?

Core2Duo wrote:
> "davmel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Bethany Ryan wrote:
>>> [email protected] writes:
>>>
>>>> The original Nokia N95 was a very high profile handset because it
>>>> offered most every feature available in a mobile phone at the time...
>>>> http://latest-mob-phones.blogspot.com/
>>> This is Australia you f-wit!
>> And if you weren't such an ignorant f-wit you would know that the UMTS 850
>> North American Nokia N95 variant will be released here is Australia next
>> month by Telstra.
>> You won't just be able to use the HSDPA capability of the N95 within a
>> small radius of our capital cities like the original N95 but over the full
>> coverage area of Next G.
>
>
> Where is this "will be released here is Australia next month by Telstra."
> stated/announced Oh wise one?

http://www.telstra.com.au/abouttelst...ObjectID=40918

davmel wrote...

> > Where is this "will be released here is Australia next month by Telstra."
> > stated/announced Oh wise one?
>
> http://www.telstra.com.au/abouttelst...ObjectID=40918

Mid November, it says. It will be interesting to see where the N95 is priced at.
I'm tipping that it'll be up there with the likes of the Blackjack, Treo and
A801s.

ie. unaffordable for the plebs...


--
I don't know what weapons will be used to fight World War
III. But World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. Einstein.

GB wrote...

> Which is a good thing for the plebs, of course. If you can't
> afford the piece of **** then you won't lose your money on the
> piece of ****.

Why is this phone a POS?

"Marts" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:u3lvi3t5e9uit6q9igrtoosn2tpeiv1l5l@martz_57.com...
> GB wrote...
>
>> Which is a good thing for the plebs, of course. If you can't
>> afford the piece of **** then you won't lose your money on the
>> piece of ****.
>
> Why is this phone a POS?
>

MANY firmware problems.

(and the GPS mapping is hopelessly slow)

"The Family" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Marts" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:u3lvi3t5e9uit6q9igrtoosn2tpeiv1l5l@martz_57.com...
>> GB wrote...
>>
>>> Which is a good thing for the plebs, of course. If you can't
>>> afford the piece of **** then you won't lose your money on the
>>> piece of ****.
>>
>> Why is this phone a POS?
>>
>
> MANY firmware problems.

Thats why god invented firmware upgrades.

> (and the GPS mapping is hopelessly slow)

who cares? get a proper GPS
>
>

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:51:55 Michael may have written:
> >> Why is this phone a POS?
> >
> > MANY firmware problems.
>
> Thats why god invented firmware upgrades.

He also inventede software testing.

> > (and the GPS mapping is hopelessly slow)
>
> who cares? get a proper GPS

Do you still say that about mobile phone cameras?

PD

--
Paul Day

Paul Day wrote...

> > who cares? get a proper GPS
>
> Do you still say that about mobile phone cameras?

I would. I've yet to see any camera in a phone that was worth a damn. In spades
with my current Treo's phone. Only good for "happy snaps" or close up shots.

For anything else, buy a cheap 6mp 3x zoom Kodak.


--
Flying is the second greatest experience known to man.
Landing is the first.

Marts <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paul Day wrote...

>>> who cares? get a proper GPS

>> Do you still say that about mobile phone cameras?

> I would. I've yet to see any camera in a phone that was worth a damn.

You need to get out more.

> In spades with my current Treo's phone.
> Only good for "happy snaps" or close up shots.

> For anything else, buy a cheap 6mp 3x zoom Kodak.

Much more convenient to have a decent camera in the one thing
you carry around with you all the time, even if the only thing you
take photos of much is stuff thats on offer when having a look at
whats on offer when buying something. Much more convenient
to take a photo than to write down the details otherwise etc.

Rod Speed wrote...

> > I would. I've yet to see any camera in a phone that was worth a damn.
>
> You need to get out more.

Undoubtedly. Unfortunately, though, I don't live my life by what resolution
cameras are available in phones. Just that what I have used and seen aren't that
much chop.

> Much more convenient to have a decent camera in the one thing
> you carry around with you all the time, even if the only thing you
> take photos of much is stuff thats on offer when having a look at
> whats on offer when buying something. Much more convenient
> to take a photo than to write down the details otherwise etc.

Yep, for sure. eg. in the stupidmarket. Missus wants some exotic brand of indian
curry. can't seem to find it. See something similar. take a photo and MMS it to
her. She can then say yay or nay.

I understand that a top end Nokia now has a 5mp camera. Now that sounds like it
would do the job. Dunno if it has a zoom function or not. Mine does, but it's
digital zoom which is OK for zooming in on a photo while viewing it from the
phone. But as you'd expect, quality isn't that flash when you do that.

Marts <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Marts <[email protected]> wrote

>>> I would. I've yet to see any camera in a phone that was worth a damn.

>> You need to get out more.

> Undoubtedly. Unfortunately, though, I don't live my life
> by what resolution cameras are available in phones.
> Just that what I have used and seen aren't that much chop.

You need to work out how to find what you want when upgrading your phone/pda etc.

>> Much more convenient to have a decent camera in the one thing
>> you carry around with you all the time, even if the only thing you
>> take photos of much is stuff thats on offer when having a look at
>> whats on offer when buying something. Much more convenient
>> to take a photo than to write down the details otherwise etc.

> Yep, for sure. eg. in the stupidmarket. Missus wants some exotic
> brand of indian curry. can't seem to find it. See something similar.
> take a photo and MMS it to her. She can then say yay or nay.

Yep, very convenient.

> I understand that a top end Nokia now has a 5mp camera.
> Now that sounds like it would do the job.

Yep.

> Dunno if it has a zoom function or not.

Yes it does.

> Mine does, but it's digital zoom which is OK for zooming
> in on a photo while viewing it from the phone. But as
> you'd expect, quality isn't that flash when you do that.

Its quite adequate with the higher resolution cameras.

"Marts" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:apo3k3p9koep6a49i1v2ogq0hln3nj1aru@martz_57.com...
> Paul Day wrote...
>
>> > who cares? get a proper GPS
>>
>> Do you still say that about mobile phone cameras?
>
> I would. I've yet to see any camera in a phone that was worth a damn. In
> spades
> with my current Treo's phone. Only good for "happy snaps" or close up
> shots.

3.2mp or 5mp pixel cameras in phones are no good?

Even my 2mp camera is quite good