Fast broadband: Telstra the only option

Alan Parkington wrote:
> From
> http://www.theage.com.au/news/busine...555530479.html

**** OFF Alan and stop sprouting your propaganda!


--
The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
<http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452>

---

› See More: Fast broadband: Telstra the only option

"Simon Templar" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Alan Parkington wrote:
>> From
>> http://www.theage.com.au/news/busine...555530479.html
>
> **** OFF Alan and stop sprouting your propaganda!
>


So a reputable news organisation like The Age is propoganda? Christ, it's
not not like its the Green Left Weekly or somthing..

Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
> Simon Templar <[email protected]> wrote
>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote

>>> From
>>> http://www.theage.com.au/news/busine...555530479.html

>> **** OFF Alan and stop sprouting your propaganda!

> So a reputable news organisation like The Age is propoganda?

Nope, you selective quoting of what supports the telstra propaganda line is tho.

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>> Simon Templar <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>
>>>> From
>>>> http://www.theage.com.au/news/busine...555530479.html
>
>>> **** OFF Alan and stop sprouting your propaganda!
>
>> So a reputable news organisation like The Age is propoganda?
>
> Nope, you selective quoting of what supports the telstra propaganda line
> is tho.
>
>
>

With the amount of negative hogwash about Telstra, it needs a voice on its
side to bring balance to the debate. Think of me as the Miranda Devine of
the Herald, if you prefer..

Alan Parkington wrote:
> With the amount of negative hogwash about Telstra, it needs a voice on its
> side to bring balance to the debate.

With the damage the Mexican has caused, the negative publicity is more
than justified. Tell him to **** OFF!


--
The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
<http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452>

Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Simon Templar <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote

>>>>> From
>>>>> http://www.theage.com.au/news/busine...555530479.html

>>>> **** OFF Alan and stop sprouting your propaganda!

>>> So a reputable news organisation like The Age is propoganda?

>> Nope, your selective quoting of what supports the telstra propaganda line is tho.

> With the amount of negative hogwash about Telstra,

Just the facts, ****wit.

> it needs a voice on its side to bring balance to the debate.

You wouldnt know what balanced debate was if it bit you on your lard arse, wanker.

> Think of me as the Miranda Devine of the Herald, if you prefer..

You're actually the Helen Demidenko, ****wit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Darville

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> Simon Templar <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>
>>>>>> From
>>>>>> http://www.theage.com.au/news/busine...555530479.html
>
>>>>> **** OFF Alan and stop sprouting your propaganda!
>
>>>> So a reputable news organisation like The Age is propoganda?
>
>>> Nope, your selective quoting of what supports the telstra propaganda
>>> line is tho.
>
>> With the amount of negative hogwash about Telstra,
>
> Just the facts, ****wit.
>
>> it needs a voice on its side to bring balance to the debate.
>
> You wouldnt know what balanced debate was if it bit you on your lard arse,
> wanker.
>
>> Think of me as the Miranda Devine of the Herald, if you prefer..
>
> You're actually the Helen Demidenko, ****wit.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Darville
>

Balanced debate, means NOT calling people names like "lard arse and wanker"
at every possible opportunity, but then you wouldn't know anything about
that would you Roddles?

-=Spudley=- <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> Simon Templar <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>>
>>>>>>> From
>>>>>>> http://www.theage.com.au/news/busine...555530479.html
>>
>>>>>> **** OFF Alan and stop sprouting your propaganda!
>>
>>>>> So a reputable news organisation like The Age is propoganda?
>>
>>>> Nope, your selective quoting of what supports the telstra
>>>> propaganda line is tho.
>>
>>> With the amount of negative hogwash about Telstra,
>>
>> Just the facts, ****wit.
>>
>>> it needs a voice on its side to bring balance to the debate.
>>
>> You wouldnt know what balanced debate was if it bit you on your lard
>> arse, wanker.
>>
>>> Think of me as the Miranda Devine of the Herald, if you prefer..
>>
>> You're actually the Helen Demidenko, ****wit.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Darville

> Balanced debate, means NOT calling people names like "lard arse and wanker" at every possible opportunity,

You wouldnt know what balanced debate was if it bit you on your lard arse, child.

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> -=Spudley=- <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>> Simon Templar <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>>> Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote
>>>
>>>>>>>> From
>>>>>>>> http://www.theage.com.au/news/busine...555530479.html
>>>
>>>>>>> **** OFF Alan and stop sprouting your propaganda!
>>>
>>>>>> So a reputable news organisation like The Age is propoganda?
>>>
>>>>> Nope, your selective quoting of what supports the telstra
>>>>> propaganda line is tho.
>>>
>>>> With the amount of negative hogwash about Telstra,
>>>
>>> Just the facts, ****wit.
>>>
>>>> it needs a voice on its side to bring balance to the debate.
>>>
>>> You wouldnt know what balanced debate was if it bit you on your lard
>>> arse, wanker.
>>>
>>>> Think of me as the Miranda Devine of the Herald, if you prefer..
>>>
>>> You're actually the Helen Demidenko, ****wit.
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Darville
>
>> Balanced debate, means NOT calling people names like "lard arse and
>> wanker" at every possible opportunity,
>
> You wouldnt know what balanced debate was if it bit you on your lard arse,
> child.
>

That's a little better than "wanker", even if you don't know what the hell
you're talking about.
Use the meds... Rod.

"-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Balanced debate, means NOT calling people names like "lard arse and
> wanker" at every possible opportunity,

Since when? Plucking definitions out of your arse is doing nothing for your
already pathetic credibility.
Balanced debate is simply the act of discussing an issue, with opposing
sides presenting their own particular view on the topic. It doesn't preclude
taunts or abuse.

--
Kwyj.

"Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Balanced debate, means NOT calling people names like "lard arse and
>> wanker" at every possible opportunity,
>
> Since when? Plucking definitions out of your arse is doing nothing for
> your already pathetic credibility.
> Balanced debate is simply the act of discussing an issue, with opposing
> sides presenting their own particular view on the topic. It doesn't
> preclude taunts or abuse.
>

This might be so in your myopic unimportant world, where abuse and taunts
have become as normal as a second nature.
But in circles where it truly matters, decorum is a most important
attribute, that's if you hope to get you point across while preserving
credibility.

Which is something Rod looses each and every time he tacks on his
unnecessary abusive taunt.

> --
> Kwyj.
>

Some gutless ****wit desperately cowering behind
-=Spudley=- <[email protected]> wrote
just the puerile **** thats all it can ever manage.

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Some gutless ****wit desperately cowering behind
> -=Spudley=- <[email protected]> wrote
> just the puerile **** thats all it can ever manage.
>

Is that it?
Pathetic, Roddles as usual.

Some gutless ****wit desperately cowering behind
-=Spudley=- <[email protected]> wrote
just the puerile **** thats all it can ever manage.

"-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:%[email protected]...
>
> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Balanced debate, means NOT calling people names like "lard arse and
>>> wanker" at every possible opportunity,
>>
>> Since when? Plucking definitions out of your arse is doing nothing for
>> your already pathetic credibility.
>> Balanced debate is simply the act of discussing an issue, with opposing
>> sides presenting their own particular view on the topic. It doesn't
>> preclude taunts or abuse.
>>
>
> This might be so in your myopic unimportant world, where abuse and taunts
> have become as normal as a second nature.

ROFL at the most ridiculous hypocrite on the planet. Myopic? Unimportant?
Just because you managed to string a few insulting words together without
swearing does not make them any less 'taunting', you ignorant ****wit.

> But in circles where it truly matters,

The only thing going in circles is your thought processes.
You claim that balanced debate does not include taunts or abuse, then
attempt to debate me by using those same taunts you so despise.

> decorum is a most important attribute, that's if you hope to get you point
> across while preserving credibility.

You've got nothing to worry about there. You had no credibility to start
with.

--
Kwyj.