20 reasons why Next G is better than CDMA

Michael wrote...

> How many of your "mates" raised a fault report?

None of them. However, the locals have, from what the guys in the pub were
saying.

But then, seeing that this is a Usenet post from a guy called "Snapper", you're
probably wise to take what you're reading with a grain of salt.

---

› See More: 20 reasons why Next G is better than CDMA

"Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael wrote...
>
>> How many of your "mates" raised a fault report?
>
> None of them. However, the locals have, from what the guys in the pub were
> saying.

Given that none of you have raised a fault, you and your mates get what you
deserve

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> Graeme Willox wrote
>
>>>>> 1 reason why CDMA is better than NextG out in the bush: Calls work
>>>>> much further from the BTS.
>
>>>> But NextG has more total coverage (via more sites) so your point is
>>>> useless
>
>>> No it isnt when the extra sites arent anywhere near where someone
>>> who used to be able to use a cdma phone cant use a NextG phone.
>
>> There are only a handful of situations like that.
>
> Bare faced pig ignorant lie.
>
>> Mostly in non-viable country areas, so who gives a toss
>
> The acma, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning ****wit child.

No, they dont give a toss, theyve declared the network is "equivalent"
>
>

"Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael wrote...
>
>> > Wow. 0.9 percent increase. I'm impressed. Of course, it's probably in
>> > areas where it's not needed...
>
>> The differential b/w 98.9 and 98.0 is 400,000 sq km. Which is apparantly
>> twice the size of Victoria, fool
>
> What an offensive prick you are.
>
> In any case, this "0.9%" increase could well be somewhere like the Simpson
> Desert where it matters **** all in the grand scheme of things. What
> matters if

Telstra likes money. So they put coverage where they are going to make $$$.

And that aint the Simpson desert

> It would be nice, if but a pipe dream, that Telstra coverage maps were
> actually
> accurate and truly represented the coverage that people get and we could
> then
> overlay the CDMA one with the NextG one to see what the difference
> actually is.
>
> But that'd be asking too much, wouldn't it?

Apparently it is. I could never understand why they took the CDMA map down
>

"Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael wrote...
>
>> If anything, its a fault, and those stupid Gippslanders wouldnt know how
>> to
>> report one if their arse was on fire.
>
> They probably think the same about you, too...
>
>> Why would Telstra select Dargo, to turn CDMA off, and not close any other
>> sites in Aus?
>
> Who knows why Telstra does what it does? It's one of those great
> unanswered
> questions.

its just tin-hat paranoia
>
>

"Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> Michael wrote...
>
>> > Most people don't give a **** about Mobile Foxtel!
>>
>> Nope, that one is pretty popular
>
> I'm tipping with kids/teenagers/people with more money than sense.

It matters not who it is, as long as the $$$s roll in

Michael <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>> Graeme Willox wrote

>>>>>> 1 reason why CDMA is better than NextG out in the bush: Calls work much further from the BTS.

>>>>> But NextG has more total coverage (via more sites) so your point is useless

>>>> No it isnt when the extra sites arent anywhere near where someone
>>>> who used to be able to use a cdma phone cant use a NextG phone.

>>> There are only a handful of situations like that.

>> Bare faced pig ignorant lie.

>>> Mostly in non-viable country areas, so who gives a toss

>> The acma, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning ****wit child.

> No, they dont give a toss,

They clearly do.

> theyve declared the network is "equivalent"

And conroy hasnt allowed the cdma system to be turned off, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

And come the new possible shutdown date, the acma will notice that telstra hasnt
been able to fix the problem just by changing handsets and antennas etc and telstra
will be raped with a telephone pole by the govt, yet again, you watch.

On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:25:15 Michael may have written:
> > None of them. However, the locals have, from what the guys in the pub were
> > saying.
>
> Given that none of you have raised a fault, you and your mates get what you
> deserve

Nothing quite beats using your paying customers as beta testers...

PD

--
Paul Day

Michael wrote...

>>> Mostly in non-viable country areas, so who gives a toss
>>
>> The acma, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning ****wit child.
>
>No, they dont give a toss, theyve declared the network is "equivalent"

Yep, and "equivalent" doesn't necessarily mean "the same".

So, yeah, there may be more city people who couldn't get CDMA but now get
NextG and more country people who could get CDMA but can't get NextG. The
numbers balance, but unfortunately the coverage, where needed and which
once was, is no longer.



--
A little knowledge is dangerous. So is a lot.

Paul Day wrote...

>On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:25:15 Michael may have written:
>> > None of them. However, the locals have, from what the guys in the pub were
>> > saying.
>>
>> Given that none of you have raised a fault, you and your mates get what you
>> deserve
>
>Nothing quite beats using your paying customers as beta testers...

Michael doesn't appreciate that these guys were just dropping in for a
drink on their way through Dargo. I would imagine that it's the last thing
on their minds once they get home, but it would be for the residents who
lost their CDMA service.



--
A little knowledge is dangerous. So is a lot.

"Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Michael wrote...
>
>>>> Mostly in non-viable country areas, so who gives a toss
>>>
>>> The acma, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning ****wit child.
>>
>>No, they dont give a toss, theyve declared the network is "equivalent"
>
> Yep, and "equivalent" doesn't necessarily mean "the same".

The ACMA didnt ask for the network to be the same

> So, yeah, there may be more city people who couldn't get CDMA but now get
> NextG and more country people who could get CDMA but can't get NextG. The
> numbers balance, but unfortunately the coverage, where needed and which
> once was, is no longer.

Rubbish and cockdribble.

Over 400,000 sq km extra with NextG

"Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Paul Day wrote...
>
>>On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:25:15 Michael may have written:
>>> > None of them. However, the locals have, from what the guys in the pub
>>> > were
>>> > saying.
>>>
>>> Given that none of you have raised a fault, you and your mates get what
>>> you
>>> deserve
>>
>>Nothing quite beats using your paying customers as beta testers...
>
> Michael doesn't appreciate that these guys were just dropping in for a
> drink on their way through Dargo. I would imagine that it's the last thing
> on their minds once they get home, but it would be for the residents who
> lost their CDMA service.

All ok for your mates to pass through, but the locals of Dargo must be
pretty ****ing stupid if they cant get around to reporting a fault. Morons
get what they deserve, in that case
>
>
>
> --
> A little knowledge is dangerous. So is a lot.

Michael wrote...

>Rubbish and cockdribble.

And piffle and codswallop to you, old chap.

>Over 400,000 sq km extra with NextG

Doesn't mean that what I said may not be correct - that where there were
areas with decent CDMA coverage are now in NextG blackspots while former
CDMA blackspots now enjoy CDMA coverage.

Thing is, it's irrelevant what the ACMA "wanted" from Telstra with respect
to "equivalent" coverage. It's the message that the consumers are getting
with Telstra promotions. That's what matters, and what also matters is the
real world experiences that consumers are recieving with their new NextG
services.

Anyway, I'm off on a trip around NE Vic and SE NSW next weekend. I'll see
how NextG coverage is compared to this time last year. Will post my
findings when I get back.



--
A little knowledge is dangerous. So is a lot.