Results 1 to 15 of 23
- 02-22-2008, 12:04 AM #1Guest
If other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
be interested in my problem. What Telstra did was allow someone to
set up an apparently fixed telephone account, and have the bill sent
to my personal address. At first I did not open the Telstra
envelopes for about three months, and wrote "return to sender -- wrong
address", blocking out my address; but then I received mail from
Creditech, a division of Telstra, so I opened the letter and read what
it was all about, and then wrote a letter explaining that the person
concerned did not live at my address, and if they did not stop
annoying me I would have to see a solicitor to have them sued for
harassment.
However letters from Creditech still kept arriving, and I did see a
solicitor, who I am friends with, and he wrote them a letter
threatening them. However, I then received correspondence from Dun &
Bradstreet, acting on behalf of Telstra to collect amounts owing, and
so it was back to the solicitor, who has written that court action
will be taken on my behalf if this harassment does not stop, and, for
about three weeks, I have heard nothing from Dun & Bradstreet. The
main problem is that if nothing was done about the matter, it could be
the case that anyone living at my address could be stopped from
obtaining credit, as well as the fact that if I did not defend myself
it might be assumed by the courts that I am really the person that the
Telstra bills are meant for.
I have my suspicions of who the person is who opened that account with
Telstra, since he is a person who I recently underwent litigation with
to my satisfaction, and, since he is a confidence man, he is likely to
do anything, I, in fact, recently received mail from a different
company for the same person involved in the Telstra scam, but no money
was involved, and I was able to ring up the people concerned and
explain the problem satisfactorily. In there is any more trouble, I
suppose that I will have to take the matter to the police, but you
have to be careful that you don't defame someone.
What I am annoyed about with Telstra, however, is why they do not have
adequate processes in place to stop someone from using a false address
when setting up an account, and the fact that they did not bother to
answer any correspondence from me or my solicitor, but just allowed
the matter to go ahead to have Dun & Bradstreet harass me, in the hope
perhaps that I would settle the account anyway, just for the sake of
peace. Well, I will certainly not be doing any business with
Telstra, if that is their ethical perspective. What Telstra is, now,
I think, under the influence of the current wetbacks running the show,
is a gangster organisation!
› See More: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
- 02-22-2008, 01:42 AM #2HorryGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:04:45 -0800 (PST), [email protected] wrote:
> If other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
> be interested in my problem. What Telstra did was allow someone to
> set up an apparently fixed telephone account, and have the bill sent
> to my personal address. At first I did not open the Telstra
> envelopes for about three months, and wrote "return to sender -- wrong
> address", blocking out my address; but then I received mail from
> Creditech, a division of Telstra, so I opened the letter and read what
> it was all about, and then wrote a letter explaining that the person
> concerned did not live at my address, and if they did not stop
> annoying me I would have to see a solicitor to have them sued for
> harassment.
How is this "harassment"?
It's just incorrectly addressed mail.
In any event, there's no tort of "harassment".
> However letters from Creditech still kept arriving, and I did see a
> solicitor, who I am friends with, and he wrote them a letter
> threatening them. However, I then received correspondence from Dun &
> Bradstreet, acting on behalf of Telstra to collect amounts owing, and
> so it was back to the solicitor, who has written that court action
> will be taken on my behalf if this harassment does not stop, and, for
> about three weeks, I have heard nothing from Dun & Bradstreet.
Why are you going to all this trouble?
Dun and Bradstreet are trying to collect from a third party who has given
your address as their mailing address (perhaps intentionally, perhaps
mistakenly).
Other than the (miniscule) annoyance of receiving these letters, it has
nothing to do with you.
> The
> main problem is that if nothing was done about the matter, it could be
> the case that anyone living at my address could be stopped from
> obtaining credit,
That's not the case.
> as well as the fact that if I did not defend myself
> it might be assumed by the courts that I am really the person that the
> Telstra bills are meant for.
If your solicitor friend told you that, he ought go back to law school.
The mail is not addressed to you (notwithstanding that it is being
delivered to your place of residence). Telstra is not alleging that YOU
owe it any money.
The courts aren't going to assume anything about you because you wouldn't
be a party to any legal proceeding. Dun & Bradstreet wouldn't have even
known your name until you gave it to them by way of your letter.
> I have my suspicions of who the person is who opened that account with
> Telstra, since he is a person who I recently underwent litigation with
> to my satisfaction, and, since he is a confidence man, he is likely to
> do anything, I, in fact, recently received mail from a different
> company for the same person involved in the Telstra scam, but no money
> was involved, and I was able to ring up the people concerned and
> explain the problem satisfactorily. In there is any more trouble, I
> suppose that I will have to take the matter to the police, but you
> have to be careful that you don't defame someone.
If you're really worried about this (and unless you're not telling us
something, I can't see why you would be), that may be a good idea. They
won't do anything, but at least you'll have a record of having done
something.
> What I am annoyed about with Telstra, however, is why they do not have
> adequate processes in place to stop someone from using a false address
> when setting up an account,
It's not a false address. The address must exist, because you live there.
It would be unworkable if a copies of title deeds or tenancy agreements
were required by every company to change address.
No doubt Telstra knows the address at which the fixed line was actually
connected.
> and the fact that they did not bother to
> answer any correspondence from me or my solicitor,
That's because you have nothing to do with it. Telstra's relationship is
with the mystery subscriber and not with you.
> but just allowed
> the matter to go ahead to have Dun & Bradstreet harass me,
No-one is "harassing" you. The letters weren't even addressed to you.
The absolute most you needed to do was mark the letters "not at this
address", and pop them in a postbox when convenient.
> in the hope
> perhaps that I would settle the account anyway, just for the sake of
> peace.
That's just bull****.
> Well, I will certainly not be doing any business with
> Telstra, if that is their ethical perspective. What Telstra is, now,
> I think, under the influence of the current wetbacks running the show,
> is a gangster organisation!
What happened to not defaming people?
You're getting upset over nothing.
- 02-22-2008, 05:38 AM #3Paul DayGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:45 [email protected] may have written:
> If other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
> be interested in my problem. What Telstra did was allow someone to
> set up an apparently fixed telephone account, and have the bill sent
> to my personal address. At first I did not open the Telstra
<snip>
It sounds like you're caring more than you need to. If the name on the
envelope isn't yours, you shouldn't be openning it, let alone wasting
your time caring about it. Debt is owned by a person, not by an address.
Just keep RTSing them.
Now if Telstra somehow managed to terminate _your_ service with them
because of it, I'd be kicking up a stink.
I do agree re: openning an account with an incorrect address. Don't
Telstra need two pieces of ID, one showing (what is likely to be) your
current address (eg, recent bill from another utility, current driver's
license), before you can open a telephone account?
PD
--
Paul Day
- 02-22-2008, 04:46 PM #4HorryGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:38:24 -0000, Paul Day wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:45 [email protected] may have written:
>> If other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
>> be interested in my problem. What Telstra did was allow someone to
>> set up an apparently fixed telephone account, and have the bill sent
>> to my personal address. At first I did not open the Telstra
> <snip>
>
> It sounds like you're caring more than you need to. If the name on the
> envelope isn't yours, you shouldn't be openning it, let alone wasting
> your time caring about it. Debt is owned by a person, not by an address.
> Just keep RTSing them.
>
> Now if Telstra somehow managed to terminate _your_ service with them
> because of it, I'd be kicking up a stink.
>
> I do agree re: openning an account with an incorrect address. Don't
> Telstra need two pieces of ID, one showing (what is likely to be) your
> current address (eg, recent bill from another utility, current driver's
> license), before you can open a telephone account?
I'm all but certain you can nominate any *billing* address you like. If
I'm wrong, I'm sure Monsieur Michael J. Ellis will correct me. (And I know
I've personally never provided Telstra with anything other than a telephone
call to connect a home phone.)
In any case, if Telstraa wants to, it wouldn't have too much trouble
tracking down the mystery subscriber's real addresss. After all, it was a
fixed line service.
Of course, they won't trouble themselves doing that, and, unless the amount
owing is considerable, Telstra's more likely to "sell" the debt to any
mercantile agent silly enough to buy it.
If the OP (Carson? Cartsten?) starts getting debt collectors repeatedly
knocking on his door looking for the disappering debtor, then he'd have
cause for complaint.
- 02-23-2008, 06:21 PM #5thegoonsGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
Why didn't you ring the number of the fixed line service and tell them that
you have been receiving their bills? Probably a clown at Telstra who typed
the wrong billing address. You are making a mountain out of a molehill and
your solicitor mate obviously hasn;t got a clue - is he the dodgy solicitor
off 'The Castle'? Thanks, Dale Kerrigan.
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> If other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
> be interested in my problem. What Telstra did was allow someone to
> set up an apparently fixed telephone account, and have the bill sent
> to my personal address. At first I did not open the Telstra
> envelopes for about three months, and wrote "return to sender -- wrong
> address", blocking out my address; but then I received mail from
> Creditech, a division of Telstra, so I opened the letter and read what
> it was all about, and then wrote a letter explaining that the person
> concerned did not live at my address, and if they did not stop
> annoying me I would have to see a solicitor to have them sued for
> harassment.
>
> However letters from Creditech still kept arriving, and I did see a
> solicitor, who I am friends with, and he wrote them a letter
> threatening them. However, I then received correspondence from Dun &
> Bradstreet, acting on behalf of Telstra to collect amounts owing, and
> so it was back to the solicitor, who has written that court action
> will be taken on my behalf if this harassment does not stop, and, for
> about three weeks, I have heard nothing from Dun & Bradstreet. The
> main problem is that if nothing was done about the matter, it could be
> the case that anyone living at my address could be stopped from
> obtaining credit, as well as the fact that if I did not defend myself
> it might be assumed by the courts that I am really the person that the
> Telstra bills are meant for.
>
> I have my suspicions of who the person is who opened that account with
> Telstra, since he is a person who I recently underwent litigation with
> to my satisfaction, and, since he is a confidence man, he is likely to
> do anything, I, in fact, recently received mail from a different
> company for the same person involved in the Telstra scam, but no money
> was involved, and I was able to ring up the people concerned and
> explain the problem satisfactorily. In there is any more trouble, I
> suppose that I will have to take the matter to the police, but you
> have to be careful that you don't defame someone.
>
> What I am annoyed about with Telstra, however, is why they do not have
> adequate processes in place to stop someone from using a false address
> when setting up an account, and the fact that they did not bother to
> answer any correspondence from me or my solicitor, but just allowed
> the matter to go ahead to have Dun & Bradstreet harass me, in the hope
> perhaps that I would settle the account anyway, just for the sake of
> peace. Well, I will certainly not be doing any business with
> Telstra, if that is their ethical perspective. What Telstra is, now,
> I think, under the influence of the current wetbacks running the show,
> is a gangster organisation!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
- 02-24-2008, 06:01 PM #6AliceGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
[email protected] wrote:
> If other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
> be interested in my problem.
Your problem began when you started opening someone else's mail.
> set up an apparently fixed telephone account, and have the bill sent
> to my personal address. At first I did not open the Telstra
> envelopes for about three months, and wrote "return to sender -- wrong
> address", blocking out my address; but then I received mail from
> Creditech, a division of Telstra, so I opened the letter and read what
> it was all about, and then wrote a letter explaining that the person
> concerned did not live at my address, and if they did not stop
> annoying me I would have to see a solicitor to have them sued for
> harassment.
Wow, incorrectly addressed mail constitutes harassment in your eyes? Do
you seek psychiatric counselling when someone beeps their car horn at
you in traffic?
>
> However letters from Creditech still kept arriving, and I did see a
> solicitor, who I am friends with, and he wrote them a letter
> threatening them. However, I then received correspondence from Dun &
> Bradstreet, acting on behalf of Telstra to collect amounts owing, and
> so it was back to the solicitor, who has written that court action
> will be taken on my behalf if this harassment does not stop, and, for
> about three weeks, I have heard nothing from Dun & Bradstreet. The
> main problem is that if nothing was done about the matter, it could be
> the case that anyone living at my address could be stopped from
> obtaining credit,
Who fed you that particular load of crap - your 'solicitor' friend?
> I have my suspicions of who the person is who opened that account with
> Telstra, since he is a person who I recently underwent litigation with
> to my satisfaction,
Yep, you strike me as the sue-first, think-later type.
- 02-25-2008, 02:47 AM #7Alan ParkingtonGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> If other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
> be interested in my problem.
Typical racist rubbish. Pay your bills, deadbeat, and you'll be fine.
- 02-25-2008, 05:35 AM #8thegoonsGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
"John Phillips" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:47:54 GMT "Alan Parkington"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > If other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they
>> > will be interested in my problem.
>>
>> Typical racist rubbish.
>
> What's racist about the above statement, shrill?
Parko felt virgmob007 was paying-out on the black Mexican wog.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
- 02-25-2008, 07:35 AM #9John PhillipsGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:35:08 +1100 "thegoons" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > What's racist about the above statement, shrill?
>
> Parko felt virgmob007 was paying-out on the black Mexican wog.
Even that is not racist! ;-)
- 02-29-2008, 12:25 AM #10Guest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
On Feb 22, 9:38*pm, Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:45 [email protected] may have written:> If other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
> > be interested in my problem. *What Telstra did was allow someone to
> > set up an apparently fixed telephone account, and have the bill sent
> > to my personal address. *At first I did not open the Telstra
>
> <snip>
>
> It sounds like you're caring more than you need to. If the name on the
> envelope isn't yours, you shouldn't be openning it, let alone wasting
> your time caring about it. Debt is owned by a person, not by an address.
> Just keep RTSing them
My solicitor advised me to do absolutely nothing about it (i.e.throw
the letters in the bin), and if Telstra's agents were stupid enough to
somehow involve me in legal proceedings then they would pay a
financial penalty. I was more wary about the matter, as, for one
thing, I did not know what the financial consequences legally would be
for myself, so I thought it best to try to reason with the Beast
(i.e., Telstra's agents). For about a month now I have heard
nothing from Dun & Bradstreet, so they finally must have got the
message from my solicitor.
The thing is, moreover, that I have received correspondence for the
same person at my address as was involved with the Telstra scam, from
another company, so it is someone deliberately targeting myself. If
it is the person I think, then he is very legally cunning (and is
regarded as a vexatious litigant by the legal fraternity), so there is
bound to be some method in his madness. Perhaps it is the case that
in relation to my opening of the letters is where he hopes to trap me
legally, assuming there is some penalty involving opening letters
posted to your address meant for another person. The sensible thing
therefore to do was to follow my solicitor's original advice.
>
> Now if Telstra somehow managed to terminate _your_ service with them
> because of it, I'd be kicking up a stink.
>
> I do agree re: openning an account with an incorrect address. Don't
> Telstra need two pieces of ID, one showing (what is likely to be) your
> current address (eg, recent bill from another utility, current driver's
> license), before you can open a telephone account?
>
> PD
>
> --
> Paul Day
- 02-29-2008, 12:50 AM #11thegoonsGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
Why didn't you ring the landline and see who the **** answered?
You want this to go on and on don't you?
Involving solictors and the likes for a non-issue.
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:a1110751-b8eb-41fc-beb2-95bd02d974e0@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 22, 9:38 pm, Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:45 [email protected] may have written:> If
> other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
> > be interested in my problem. What Telstra did was allow someone to
> > set up an apparently fixed telephone account, and have the bill sent
> > to my personal address. At first I did not open the Telstra
>
> <snip>
>
> It sounds like you're caring more than you need to. If the name on the
> envelope isn't yours, you shouldn't be openning it, let alone wasting
> your time caring about it. Debt is owned by a person, not by an address.
> Just keep RTSing them
My solicitor advised me to do absolutely nothing about it (i.e.throw
the letters in the bin), and if Telstra's agents were stupid enough to
somehow involve me in legal proceedings then they would pay a
financial penalty. I was more wary about the matter, as, for one
thing, I did not know what the financial consequences legally would be
for myself, so I thought it best to try to reason with the Beast
(i.e., Telstra's agents). For about a month now I have heard
nothing from Dun & Bradstreet, so they finally must have got the
message from my solicitor.
The thing is, moreover, that I have received correspondence for the
same person at my address as was involved with the Telstra scam, from
another company, so it is someone deliberately targeting myself. If
it is the person I think, then he is very legally cunning (and is
regarded as a vexatious litigant by the legal fraternity), so there is
bound to be some method in his madness. Perhaps it is the case that
in relation to my opening of the letters is where he hopes to trap me
legally, assuming there is some penalty involving opening letters
posted to your address meant for another person. The sensible thing
therefore to do was to follow my solicitor's original advice.
>
> Now if Telstra somehow managed to terminate _your_ service with them
> because of it, I'd be kicking up a stink.
>
> I do agree re: openning an account with an incorrect address. Don't
> Telstra need two pieces of ID, one showing (what is likely to be) your
> current address (eg, recent bill from another utility, current driver's
> license), before you can open a telephone account?
>
> PD
>
> --
> Paul Day
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
- 02-29-2008, 01:18 AM #12Guest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
On Feb 29, 4:50*pm, "thegoons" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why didn't you ring the landline and see who the **** answered?
>
> You want this to go on and on don't you?
>
> Involving solictors and the likes for a non-issue.
No, Telstra obviously had cancelled the account a fair time ago, and
was seeking payment. I only started to open the letters after
Creditech was involved. The lesson here is that if anyone is in the
same situation is not to do anything (or go to the trouble of RTSing),
I suppose -- although it is all rather legally dicey, as there is no
ethics in business!
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:a1110751-b8eb-41fc-beb2-95bd02d974e0@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 22, 9:38 pm, Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:45 [email protected] may have written:> If
> > other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
> > > be interested in my problem. What Telstra did was allow someone to
> > > set up an apparently fixed telephone account, and have the bill sent
> > > to my personal address. At first I did not open the Telstra
>
> > <snip>
>
> > It sounds like you're caring more than you need to. If the name on the
> > envelope isn't yours, you shouldn't be openning it, let alone wasting
> > your time caring about it. Debt is owned by a person, not by an address.
> > Just keep RTSing them
>
> My solicitor advised me to do absolutely nothing about it (i.e.throw
> the letters in the bin), and if Telstra's agents were stupid enough to
> somehow involve me in legal proceedings then they would pay a
> financial penalty. * I was more wary about the matter, as, for one
> thing, I did not know what the financial consequences legally would be
> for myself, so I thought it best to try to reason with the Beast
> (i.e., Telstra's agents). * *For about *a month now I have heard
> nothing from Dun & Bradstreet, so they finally must have got the
> message from my solicitor.
>
> The thing is, moreover, that I have received correspondence for the
> same person at my address as was involved with the Telstra scam, from
> another company, *so it is someone deliberately targeting myself. * If
> it is the person I think, then he is very legally cunning (and is
> regarded as a vexatious litigant by the legal fraternity), so there is
> bound to be some method in his madness. * Perhaps it is the case that
> in relation to my opening of the letters is where he hopes to trap me
> legally, assuming there is some penalty involving opening letters
> posted to your address meant for another person. * The sensible thing
> therefore to do was to follow my solicitor's original advice.
>
>
>
> > Now if Telstra somehow managed to terminate _your_ service with them
> > because of it, I'd be kicking up a stink.
>
> > I do agree re: openning an account with an incorrect address. Don't
> > Telstra need two pieces of ID, one showing (what is likely to be) your
> > current address (eg, recent bill from another utility, current driver's
> > license), before you can open a telephone account?
>
> > PD
>
> > --
> > Paul Day
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
- 02-29-2008, 01:20 AM #13HorryGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:18:59 -0800 (PST), [email protected] wrote:
> although it is all rather legally dicey,
No it's not.
- 02-29-2008, 02:36 AM #14thegoonsGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
Isn't it a Federal crime to open mail that is not addressed to you with your
name on it?
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:7e6e2a72-b18f-4cc7-b0c2-cc111cdbf805@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 29, 4:50 pm, "thegoons" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why didn't you ring the landline and see who the **** answered?
>
> You want this to go on and on don't you?
>
> Involving solictors and the likes for a non-issue.
No, Telstra obviously had cancelled the account a fair time ago, and
was seeking payment. I only started to open the letters after
Creditech was involved. The lesson here is that if anyone is in the
same situation is not to do anything (or go to the trouble of RTSing),
I suppose -- although it is all rather legally dicey, as there is no
ethics in business!
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:a1110751-b8eb-41fc-beb2-95bd02d974e0@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 22, 9:38 pm, Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:45 [email protected] may have written:>
> > If
> > other people think they have their Telstra troubles, then they will
> > > be interested in my problem. What Telstra did was allow someone to
> > > set up an apparently fixed telephone account, and have the bill sent
> > > to my personal address. At first I did not open the Telstra
>
> > <snip>
>
> > It sounds like you're caring more than you need to. If the name on the
> > envelope isn't yours, you shouldn't be openning it, let alone wasting
> > your time caring about it. Debt is owned by a person, not by an address.
> > Just keep RTSing them
>
> My solicitor advised me to do absolutely nothing about it (i.e.throw
> the letters in the bin), and if Telstra's agents were stupid enough to
> somehow involve me in legal proceedings then they would pay a
> financial penalty. I was more wary about the matter, as, for one
> thing, I did not know what the financial consequences legally would be
> for myself, so I thought it best to try to reason with the Beast
> (i.e., Telstra's agents). For about a month now I have heard
> nothing from Dun & Bradstreet, so they finally must have got the
> message from my solicitor.
>
> The thing is, moreover, that I have received correspondence for the
> same person at my address as was involved with the Telstra scam, from
> another company, so it is someone deliberately targeting myself. If
> it is the person I think, then he is very legally cunning (and is
> regarded as a vexatious litigant by the legal fraternity), so there is
> bound to be some method in his madness. Perhaps it is the case that
> in relation to my opening of the letters is where he hopes to trap me
> legally, assuming there is some penalty involving opening letters
> posted to your address meant for another person. The sensible thing
> therefore to do was to follow my solicitor's original advice.
>
>
>
> > Now if Telstra somehow managed to terminate _your_ service with them
> > because of it, I'd be kicking up a stink.
>
> > I do agree re: openning an account with an incorrect address. Don't
> > Telstra need two pieces of ID, one showing (what is likely to be) your
> > current address (eg, recent bill from another utility, current driver's
> > license), before you can open a telephone account?
>
> > PD
>
> > --
> > Paul Day
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
- 02-29-2008, 03:03 AM #15HorryGuest
Re: Telstra -- a gangster organisation?
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:36:07 +1100, thegoons wrote:
> Isn't it a Federal crime to open mail that is not addressed to you with your
> name on it?
A Buddhist monk here in Adelaide was prosecuted last year after he was
caught opening Reader's Digest mail addressed to "The Householder".
Similar Threads
- Sony Ericsson
- aus.comms.mobile
- aus.comms.mobile
- Nokia
- Sports
Creditare Eficientă
in Chit Chat