Telstra 3G iPhone Deal Essential Say Qantas Customers

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:20:45 GMT "Alan Parkington"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> > A spokesperson for the telco today refused to comment on the
> > report, saying that
> > Telstra had "nothing more to add" on the iPhone at this stage.
> >
>
>
> Old news. Mr Trujillo will be making an announcement on this topic
> June 26.


Is that the HTC "iPhone Killer" Parky Bot?

Pity It runs on Windoze Mobile, Parky Bot.

S - L - O - W as all ****.

http://tinyurl.com/434845

---

› See More: Telstra 3G iPhone Deal Essential Say Qantas Customers

Polly the Parrot wrote...

> Pity It runs on Windoze Mobile, Parky Bot.
>
> S - L - O - W as all ****.

It's not as if WM is slow, but it is well, a mini-me version of Windows. ie. it
crashes, its applications "have stopped responding", etc. just as much as the
big cahoona version does.

I owned a Palm Treo 750 for a while and now own a HP iPaq PDA. Both had about
the same level of stability. If I could get a PDA running PalmOS that does what
I want it to do then I would have stuck with tha OS.

PalmOS is faster, but Windows Mobile isn't slow. But then perhaps my definition
of "slow" is different to yours.

"Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Polly the Parrot wrote...
>
>> Pity It runs on Windoze Mobile, Parky Bot.
>>
>> S - L - O - W as all ****.
>
> It's not as if WM is slow, but it is well, a mini-me version of Windows.
> ie. it
> crashes, its applications "have stopped responding", etc. just as much as
> the
> big cahoona version does.

Funny. I've been using a dopod 838pro for about 18 months. First with WM5
and now with WM6 and have had no slowdowns, crashes or application lockups
either.
Hmmm. You also seem to have problems with IE and the Telstra website that no
one else seem to have.

Starting to see a pattern here?

--
Kwyj.

"Will Kemp" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Polly the Parrot wrote...
>>>
>>>> Pity It runs on Windoze Mobile, Parky Bot.
>>>>
>>>> S - L - O - W as all ****.
>>> It's not as if WM is slow, but it is well, a mini-me version of Windows.
>>> ie. it
>>> crashes, its applications "have stopped responding", etc. just as much
>>> as the
>>> big cahoona version does.
>>
>> Funny. I've been using a dopod 838pro for about 18 months. First with WM5
>> and now with WM6 and have had no slowdowns, crashes or application
>> lockups either.
>> Hmmm. You also seem to have problems with IE and the Telstra website that
>> no one else seem to have.
>>
>> Starting to see a pattern here?
>
> Yeah, he's the only honest one, probably.

Hehe. I start talking about incompetence and look who appears. The same fool
who reckoned IE7 had no 'stop' button.............

--
Kwyj.

Kwyjibo wrote...

> > Yeah, he's the only honest one, probably.
>
> Hehe. I start talking about incompetence and look who appears. The same fool
> who reckoned IE7 had no 'stop' button.............

Well, when you can demonstrate your competance in anything, then maybe we can
take what you say at face value.

Or maybe you're talking about the incompetance of Microsoft's programmers who
clearly could do with a lesson from those who make PalmOS and other handheld
operating systems that seem to be far more stable and far faster than what
Windows Mobile is.

"Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Kwyjibo wrote...
>
>> Hmmm. You also seem to have problems with IE and the Telstra website that
>> no
>> one else seem to have.
>>
>> Starting to see a pattern here?
>
> Nope. I don't use IE. But the same problems occur whether I'm using IE or
> Firefox, which is my browser of choice.
>
> Anyway, what's Telstra and IE got to do with Windows Mobile powered
> phones?

Absolutely nothing, other than providing a good example that you have an
obvious deficiency when it comes to operating computer based equipment.

--
Kwyj.

Kwyjibo wrote...

> Absolutely nothing, other than providing a good example that you have an
> obvious deficiency when it comes to operating computer based equipment.

Ah, I see. And your demonstrated competancies are?

Alan Parkington wrote...

>
> "Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > A spokesperson for the telco today refused to comment on the report,
> > saying that
> > Telstra had "nothing more to add" on the iPhone at this stage.
> >
>
>
> Old news. Mr Trujillo will be making an announcement on this topic June 26.

Um, we're still waiting. Or did he announce it only to his closest friends?

Or did you mean June 26, but not the June 26 of THIS year?

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:14:27 +1000 Snapper
<[email protected]> wrote:

> > Old news. Mr Trujillo will be making an announcement on this topic
> > June 26.
>
> Um, we're still waiting. Or did he announce it only to his closest
> friends?

With Sol the Wog as a friend, who needs enemies?

"Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Kwyjibo wrote...
>
>> Absolutely nothing, other than providing a good example that you have an
>> obvious deficiency when it comes to operating computer based equipment.
>
> Ah, I see. And your demonstrated competancies are?

Lots.

--
Kwyj.

Kwyjibo wrote...

> > Ah, I see. And your demonstrated competancies are?
>
> Lots.

As Rod would say, "easy to claim, hellava lot harder to actually substantiate".

"Horry" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:54:42 +1000, Snapper wrote:
>
>> Kwyjibo wrote...
>>
>>> Absolutely nothing, other than providing a good example that you have an
>>> obvious deficiency when it comes to operating computer based equipment.
>>
>> Ah, I see. And your demonstrated competancies are?
>
> competencies

Yes. They are.

--
Kwyj.

Michael <[email protected]> wrote:

>>> plenty of people disconnected and pissed off at cdma closure

>> Pity about those who needed the coverage that the cdma
>> system had, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

> No one needs mobile coverage.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never ever had
a ****ing clue about anything at all, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

> Its not an essential service

Irrelevant to whether anyone needs mobile coverage, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

And nothing is an essential service, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

>>>> If they had not shut the cdma network, they'd have **** all users on that 3G network.

>>> bull**** Rod,

>> Fact, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning ****wit child.

>>> they had 2m 3G users BEFORE CDMA closure

>> Because they had been proclaiming that it was about to close for a LONG time before
>> they were allowed to close it, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning ****wit child.

> And its customers saw the light and saw that the 3G network was grand.

Nope, they moved because Telstra told them they were going to
shut down the cdma service, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.