Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Horry
    Guest

    I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only
    "tentatively low".

    What have you been up to over there?



    See More: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis




  2. #2
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis

    Horry <[email protected]> wrote:

    > I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only "tentatively low".


    > What have you been up to over there?


    Its always been a bum boy.





  3. #3
    Snapper
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis

    Horry wrote...

    >
    > I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only
    > "tentatively low".


    How is that aura thing worked out?




  4. #4
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis

    Snapper <[email protected]> wrote
    > Horry wrote


    >> I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only "tentatively low".


    > How is that aura thing worked out?


    http://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/?tag=WP_Aura

    Thats the first hit with google.





  5. #5
    Horry
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis

    On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:54:38 +1000, Snapper wrote:

    > Horry wrote...
    >
    >
    >> I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only
    >> "tentatively low".

    >
    > How is that aura thing worked out?


    Users with an Aura ranking that is prefixed with the word "Pervasively"
    have received a large amount of votes from other users (300+), and as
    such their Aura is likely to be highly representative of the collective
    community opinion of them.




  6. #6
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis


    "Horry" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only
    > "tentatively low".


    Telling it like it is






  7. #7
    Snapper
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis

    Rod Speed wrote...

    > > How is that aura thing worked out?

    >
    > http://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/?tag=WP_Aura
    >
    > Thats the first hit with google.


    Thanks. I really must be going downhill. I read through it twice and I still
    can't work out how a user's aura is set. It talks about peer voting but I can't
    see any options on that.





  8. #8
    Snapper
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis

    Will Kemp wrote...

    > Click on one of the little smiley faces below the user's name in a forum
    > post.


    Yep, saw them. But even so there's nothing obvious to suggest what they're for
    other than a highlight.




  9. #9
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis


    "Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Rod Speed wrote...
    >
    >> > How is that aura thing worked out?

    >>
    >> http://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/?tag=WP_Aura
    >>
    >> Thats the first hit with google.

    >
    > Thanks. I really must be going downhill. I read through it twice and I
    > still
    > can't work out how a user's aura is set. It talks about peer voting but I
    > can't
    > see any options on that.


    Its just a wank. Only dickheads care what others think of them on the
    intenet


    >
    >






  10. #10
    Snapper
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis

    Michael wrote...

    > Its just a wank. Only dickheads care what others think of them on the
    > intenet


    Hence your online "persona". However you try though, you still come out as one
    of these dickheads.

    And an obnoxious one at that.




  11. #11
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis


    "Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Michael wrote...
    >
    >> Its just a wank. Only dickheads care what others think of them on the
    >> intenet

    >
    > Hence your online "persona". However you try though, you still come out as
    > one
    > of these dickheads.
    >
    > And an obnoxious one at that.


    You're just feeling a bit stung because you don't even know the basics of
    the Privacy Act when it comes to accessing your wifes account
    >






  12. #12
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis

    Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
    > "Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> Michael wrote...
    >>
    >>> Its just a wank. Only dickheads care what others think of them on
    >>> the intenet

    >>
    >> Hence your online "persona". However you try though, you still come
    >> out as one
    >> of these dickheads.
    >>
    >> And an obnoxious one at that.

    >
    > You're just feeling a bit stung because you don't even know the
    > basics of the Privacy Act when it comes to accessing your wifes
    > account


    You wouldnt know what the privacy act requires if your pathetic excuse for a 'life'
    depended on that, you stupid pig ignorant illiterate dunny cleaning ****wit child.





  • Similar Threads