Virgin unveils generous iPhone 3G plans

"Will Kemp" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Personally, i couldn't care less about the iphone - but i know the
> parkybot cares, so i thought he might like to see this...
>
>
> http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...097485364.html
>
> Virgin unveils generous iPhone 3G plans
>

"Generous" is in the eye of the beholder.

Also, where do the profits from this venture go?

---

› See More: Virgin unveils generous iPhone 3G plans

On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:31:17 +0000, Alan Parkington wrote:

> "Will Kemp" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Personally, i couldn't care less about the iphone - but i know the
>> parkybot cares, so i thought he might like to see this...
>>
>>
>> http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...eils-generous-
iphone-3g-plans/2008/08/01/1217097485364.html
>>
>> Virgin unveils generous iPhone 3G plans
>>
>
> "Generous" is in the eye of the beholder.

Isn't a 5GB allowance at Virgin's rates, in your eyes, "generous"?


> Also, where do the profits from this venture go?

Is Virgin Mobile even profitable?

Alan Poxington <wanker@iarsethiscountry,com.au> wrote
> Will Kemp <[email protected]> wrote

>> Personally, i couldn't care less about the iphone - but i know the parkybot cares, so i thought he might like to see
>> this...

>> http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...097485364.html

>> Virgin unveils generous iPhone 3G plans

> "Generous" is in the eye of the beholder.

Wrong, as always.

> Also, where do the profits from this venture go?

There are no profits, ****wit. Its always lost money, ****wit.

Horry <[email protected]> wrote
> Alan Poxington wrote
>> Will Kemp <[email protected]> wrote

>>> Personally, i couldn't care less about the iphone - but i know
>>> the parkybot cares, so i thought he might like to see this...

>>> http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...097485364.html

>>> Virgin unveils generous iPhone 3G plans

>> "Generous" is in the eye of the beholder.

> Isn't a 5GB allowance at Virgin's rates, in your eyes, "generous"?

Nope, he wanked himself blind LONG ago, stupid.

>> Also, where do the profits from this venture go?

> Is Virgin Mobile even profitable?

Nope.

What a sad bitter individual you are.

The benefits go back into the pockets to the Virgin customers who know they
are getting the best Iphone deal in Australia. Less money spent than if they
were on the extorniate data plans that Telstra offer.

"Alan Parkington" <aparkington@iheartthiscountry,com.au> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
>
> "Will Kemp" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Personally, i couldn't care less about the iphone - but i know the
>> parkybot cares, so i thought he might like to see this...
>>
>>
>> http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...097485364.html
>>
>> Virgin unveils generous iPhone 3G plans
>>
>
> "Generous" is in the eye of the beholder.
>
> Also, where do the profits from this venture go?
>

"QUEBURN" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> What a sad bitter individual you are.
>
> The benefits go back into the pockets to the Virgin customers who know
> they are getting the best Iphone deal in Australia. Less money spent than
> if they were on the extorniate data plans that Telstra offer.
>

And how many apprenticeships are Virgn offering our Aussie kids?
How many charities are helped by them as opposed to the very giving Telstra
Foundation?
How many rural and remote communities will be served by the Virgin network?

Jack Squat, Sunshine, that's how many.

Alan Poxington <wanker@iarsethiscountry,com.au> wrote
> QUEBURN <[email protected]> wrote

>> What a sad bitter individual you are.

>> The benefits go back into the pockets to the Virgin customers who
>> know they are getting the best Iphone deal in Australia. Less money
>> spent than if they were on the extorniate data plans that Telstra offer.

> And how many apprenticeships are Virgn offering our Aussie kids?

Since they dont do infrastructure, they dont need to, ****wit.

> How many charities are helped by them as opposed to the very giving Telstra Foundation?

They choose to charge their customers less instead, ****wit.

> How many rural and remote communities will be served by the Virgin network?

Plenty, ****wit.

> Jack Squat, Sunshine, that's how many.

Lying, as always.

How many satellites does Telstra run, ****wit ?

None, zero, nada, ziltch. Funny that.

"Alan Parkington" <aparkington@iheartthiscountry,com.au> wrote...

> "Generous" is in the eye of the beholder.

In relative terms it seems to be more "generous" than some other providers.

> Also, where do the profits from this venture go?

Does it really matter? These days you'll be hard pressed to find a wholy
Australian owned company that doesn't have some sort of importing of its
products.

And who owns all the companies in the energy and resource sectors, these days?

Then there's Qantas, our "flagship carrier". It's foreign owned to a certain
degree, and it's one of the biggest single causes of our current accounts
deficits, particularly when it's lashing out on a heap of new A380s soon...

On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:40:50 GMT, "Alan Parkington"
<aparkington@iheartthiscountry,com.au> wrote:

>
>"QUEBURN" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> What a sad bitter individual you are.
>>
>> The benefits go back into the pockets to the Virgin customers who know
>> they are getting the best Iphone deal in Australia. Less money spent than
>> if they were on the extorniate data plans that Telstra offer.
>>
>
>And how many apprenticeships are Virgn offering our Aussie kids?
>How many charities are helped by them as opposed to the very giving Telstra
>Foundation?
>How many rural and remote communities will be served by the Virgin network?
>
>Jack Squat, Sunshine, that's how many.
>


Yeah!
I'm with parkie.
I don't give a **** that I am being charged exorbitant fees for a
service while I know all those orphans and widows are being looked
after.
Yay for Telstra!!

--------------------------------------

If you want to win an argument, it is best to
stick to the truth.
Or provable untruths.

> Then there's Qantas, our "flagship carrier". It's foreign owned to a
> certain
> degree, and it's one of the biggest single causes of our current accounts
> deficits, particularly when it's lashing out on a heap of new A380s
> soon...

What a wanker. You expect an Australian aerospace industry to pop up
overnight?

Our foreign acct deficit is due to us importing so much foreign ****.
>
>

Michael wrote...

> > Then there's Qantas, our "flagship carrier". It's foreign owned to a
> > certain
> > degree, and it's one of the biggest single causes of our current accounts
> > deficits, particularly when it's lashing out on a heap of new A380s
> > soon...
>
> What a wanker. You expect an Australian aerospace industry to pop up
> overnight?

You're calling ME a wanker. Jesus christ. Read what I ****ing well wrote, you
silly twat.

> Our foreign acct deficit is due to us importing so much foreign ****.

No ****, sherlock.

"Alan Parkington" <aparkington@iheartthiscountry,com.au> wrote...

> "Generous" is in the eye of the beholder.

Yep. Some may still consider them to be stingy. But if you compare them with the
competition, then as a relative term "generous" is probably understating it.

I wonder if we'll ever see "cap" plans for data usage like we have for voice
calls? Or a fixed monthly fee and "all you can eat" for calls, data, MMS/SMS and
so on.

"Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> Michael wrote...
>
>> > Then there's Qantas, our "flagship carrier". It's foreign owned to a
>> > certain
>> > degree, and it's one of the biggest single causes of our current
>> > accounts
>> > deficits, particularly when it's lashing out on a heap of new A380s
>> > soon...
>>
>> What a wanker. You expect an Australian aerospace industry to pop up
>> overnight?
>
> You're calling ME a wanker. Jesus christ. Read what I ****ing well wrote,
> you
> silly twat.
>
>> Our foreign acct deficit is due to us importing so much foreign ****.
>
> No ****, sherlock.
>
Don't be so tough on Michael. He has ear to ear **** for brains and his only
job has been a PMG cleaner; forgive him for being so dumb.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"Will Kemp" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Snapper wrote:
>> "Alan Parkington" <aparkington@iheartthiscountry,com.au> wrote...
>>
>>> "Generous" is in the eye of the beholder.
>>
>> In relative terms it seems to be more "generous" than some other
>> providers.
>>
>>> Also, where do the profits from this venture go?
>>
>> Does it really matter? These days you'll be hard pressed to find a wholy
>> Australian owned company that doesn't have some sort of importing of its
>> products.
>>
>> And who owns all the companies in the energy and resource sectors, these
>> days?
>>
>> Then there's Qantas, our "flagship carrier". It's foreign owned to a
>> certain
>> degree, and it's one of the biggest single causes of our current accounts
>> deficits, particularly when it's lashing out on a heap of new A380s
>> soon...
>
> And then, of course, there's Telstra. It's foreign owned to a large degree
> too.

and controlled by a black wog mexican


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"Will Kemp" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Snapper wrote:
>> "Alan Parkington" <aparkington@iheartthiscountry,com.au> wrote...
>>
>>> "Generous" is in the eye of the beholder.
>>
>> In relative terms it seems to be more "generous" than some other
>> providers.
>>
>>> Also, where do the profits from this venture go?
>>
>> Does it really matter? These days you'll be hard pressed to find a wholy
>> Australian owned company that doesn't have some sort of importing of its
>> products.
>>
>> And who owns all the companies in the energy and resource sectors, these
>> days?
>>
>> Then there's Qantas, our "flagship carrier". It's foreign owned to a
>> certain
>> degree, and it's one of the biggest single causes of our current accounts
>> deficits, particularly when it's lashing out on a heap of new A380s
>> soon...
>
> And then, of course, there's Telstra. It's foreign owned to a large degree
> too.

<= 15% I'm guessing

You think thats a large degree?

clearly you cant count to 100