Results 1 to 14 of 14
- 10-30-2004, 05:56 PM #1eggster2kGuest
Yesterday I took my Orange branded 6600 to my usual Club Nokia
authorized service centre to have the firmware upgraded from 4.09.1
(orange customized) to 5.27.0. When i picked up the phone I was
expecting an orange customized 5.27 (not a problem to me) but to my
surprise they said they've put the standard generic 5.27 firmware on!
Brilliant. So, the talk on these newsgroups about the automatic
firmware choosing devices service centres use is prob just crap!
Chris
› See More: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
- 10-31-2004, 04:40 AM #2Steve TerryGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
"eggster2k" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Yesterday I took my Orange branded 6600 to my usual Club Nokia
> authorized service centre to have the firmware upgraded from 4.09.1
> (orange customized) to 5.27.0. When i picked up the phone I was
> expecting an orange customized 5.27 (not a problem to me) but to my
> surprise they said they've put the standard generic 5.27 firmware on!
> Brilliant. So, the talk on these newsgroups about the automatic
> firmware choosing devices service centres use is prob just crap!
> Chris
>
All depends if the engineer followed Cub Nokia policy,
and used expensive Nokia hardware, or not?
Then risk Nokia sanctions, there are many cheap unofficial
DCT4 hardware options these days.
Steve Terry
- 10-31-2004, 05:40 AM #3BORGGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:56:34 +0100, eggster2k
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Yesterday I took my Orange branded 6600 to my usual Club Nokia
>authorized service centre to have the firmware upgraded from 4.09.1
>(orange customized) to 5.27.0. When i picked up the phone I was
>expecting an orange customized 5.27 (not a problem to me) but to my
>surprise they said they've put the standard generic 5.27 firmware on!
>Brilliant. So, the talk on these newsgroups about the automatic
>firmware choosing devices service centres use is prob just crap!
>
>Chris
well they did mine and the only branding I got was the Welcome to Voda
screen at the start, no silly Voda things in the menus and a it was
set to the Vodafone theme. I don't think the 6600 comes with much
branding anyway
--
E-Mail Addy [email protected] <---Rot13 it
watch out for spam trap in header
My Cornea Transplant log
www.davessite.co.uk/eye
Want your say about the Gov,Forum at
www.walesgov.co.uk
- 10-31-2004, 10:39 AM #4Chris P BaconGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:40:32 -0000, "Steve Terry"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"eggster2k" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Yesterday I took my Orange branded 6600 to my usual Club Nokia
>> authorized service centre to have the firmware upgraded from 4.09.1
>> (orange customized) to 5.27.0. When i picked up the phone I was
>> expecting an orange customized 5.27 (not a problem to me) but to my
>> surprise they said they've put the standard generic 5.27 firmware on!
>> Brilliant. So, the talk on these newsgroups about the automatic
>> firmware choosing devices service centres use is prob just crap!
>> Chris
>>
>All depends if the engineer followed Cub Nokia policy,
>and used expensive Nokia hardware, or not?
>
>Then risk Nokia sanctions, there are many cheap unofficial
>DCT4 hardware options these days.
>
>Steve Terry
>
>
I would not have thought that a main Nokia Service Centre would be
using cheap unofficial hardware!
Chris P Bacon
- 10-31-2004, 11:01 AM #5Richard ColtonGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
"Chris P Bacon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:40:32 -0000, "Steve Terry"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>"eggster2k" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> Yesterday I took my Orange branded 6600 to my usual Club Nokia
>>> authorized service centre to have the firmware upgraded from 4.09.1
>>> (orange customized) to 5.27.0. When i picked up the phone I was
>>> expecting an orange customized 5.27 (not a problem to me) but to my
>>> surprise they said they've put the standard generic 5.27 firmware on!
>>> Brilliant. So, the talk on these newsgroups about the automatic
>>> firmware choosing devices service centres use is prob just crap!
>>> Chris
>>>
>>All depends if the engineer followed Cub Nokia policy,
>>and used expensive Nokia hardware, or not?
>>
>>Then risk Nokia sanctions, there are many cheap unofficial
>>DCT4 hardware options these days.
>>
>>Steve Terry
>>
>>
> I would not have thought that a main Nokia Service Centre would be
> using cheap unofficial hardware!
Neither would I TBH, but stranger things have been known. I think this is
more likely a case of a genuine mistake being made, or there being a problem
with the customised PPM belonging to the version of the MCU that was
flashed - hence the generic PPM being flashed instead. Some (not many
though) CNSC's will put unbranded firmware on a branded handset, but they'll
keep very quiet about it given the possible ramifications if Nokia ever
found out.
--
>>> Unlock Your Phone's Potential <<<
>>> www.uselessinfo.org.uk <<<
>>> www.thephonelocker.co.uk <<<
>>> www.gsm-solutions.co.uk <<<
- 10-31-2004, 02:44 PM #6Brian MorrisonGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:01:09 +0000, in article
<[email protected]> "Richard Colton"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Some (not many
> though) CNSC's will put unbranded firmware on a branded handset, but they'll
> keep very quiet about it given the possible ramifications if Nokia ever
> found out.
Makes you wonder why Nokia care about what is done to a customer's own
property.
--
Brian Morrison
please observe reply-to address
- 10-31-2004, 03:31 PM #7eggster2kGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:01:09 GMT, "Richard Colton"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Neither would I TBH, but stranger things have been known. I think this is
>more likely a case of a genuine mistake being made, or there being a problem
>with the customised PPM belonging to the version of the MCU that was
>flashed - hence the generic PPM being flashed instead. Some (not many
>though) CNSC's will put unbranded firmware on a branded handset, but they'll
>keep very quiet about it given the possible ramifications if Nokia ever
>found out.
As i said earlier, i took the phone in and just asked them to upgrade
the firmware, i didn't ask for a generic firmware as the orange
branding on the 6600 isn't at all bad. When i picked up the phone they
didn't keep it a secret, she told me they'd put a generic firmware on,
fine by me.
- 10-31-2004, 05:02 PM #8Richard ColtonGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
"Brian Morrison" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:01:09 +0000, in article
> <[email protected]> "Richard Colton"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Some (not many
>> though) CNSC's will put unbranded firmware on a branded handset, but
>> they'll
>> keep very quiet about it given the possible ramifications if Nokia ever
>> found out.
>
> Makes you wonder why Nokia care about what is done to a customer's own
> property.
They probably don't in all truth, however, the networks obviously do care
(or they wouldn't bastardise handsets in the first place), and Nokia will
care how many phones they sell to the networks - so in other words they
won't do anything to upset the networks.
--
>>> Unlock Your Phone's Potential <<<
>>> www.uselessinfo.org.uk <<<
>>> www.thephonelocker.co.uk <<<
>>> www.gsm-solutions.co.uk <<<
- 11-01-2004, 03:12 AM #9Richard ColtonGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
"eggster2k" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:01:09 GMT, "Richard Colton"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Neither would I TBH, but stranger things have been known. I think this is
>>more likely a case of a genuine mistake being made, or there being a
>>problem
>>with the customised PPM belonging to the version of the MCU that was
>>flashed - hence the generic PPM being flashed instead. Some (not many
>>though) CNSC's will put unbranded firmware on a branded handset, but
>>they'll
>>keep very quiet about it given the possible ramifications if Nokia ever
>>found out.
>
> As i said earlier, i took the phone in and just asked them to upgrade
> the firmware, i didn't ask for a generic firmware as the orange
> branding on the 6600 isn't at all bad. When i picked up the phone they
> didn't keep it a secret, she told me they'd put a generic firmware on,
> fine by me.
Absolutely, don't look a gift horse in the mouth and all that.
--
>>> Unlock Your Phone's Potential <<<
>>> www.uselessinfo.org.uk <<<
>>> www.thephonelocker.co.uk <<<
>>> www.gsm-solutions.co.uk <<<
- 11-01-2004, 03:21 AM #10JonGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
Brian Morrison reckoned that...
> Makes you wonder why Nokia care about what is done to a customer's own
> property.
It's quite straightforward really, network operators are by far and away
Nokia's biggest customer. Therefore Nokia does what the customer
(network operator - you are merely an 'end-user') tell them to, and that
usually includes directives along the lines of "thou shalt flash end-
user handsets with whatever we tell thee to"
--
www.unlockingshop.co.uk
SonyEricsson K700i unlock/unbrand - £22.50
Nokia 7600 Factory re-setting - £10
New LG / Sharp / VK / Sendo / Motorola phones added to the range
- 11-01-2004, 04:09 AM #11Brian MorrisonGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 23:02:18 +0000, in article
<[email protected]> "Richard Colton"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Makes you wonder why Nokia care about what is done to a customer's own
>> property.
>
> They probably don't in all truth, however, the networks obviously do care
> (or they wouldn't bastardise handsets in the first place), and Nokia will
> care how many phones they sell to the networks - so in other words they
> won't do anything to upset the networks.
Sad really. I go out of my way to avoid customised phones, and I hate
branding. A lot of other people clearly feel the same way. Pity the
networks don't take more notice of their customers in that sense.
--
Brian Morrison
please observe reply-to address
- 11-01-2004, 11:03 AM #12Brian MorrisonGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 09:21:08 +0000, in article
<[email protected]> Jon <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Brian Morrison reckoned that...
>> Makes you wonder why Nokia care about what is done to a customer's own
>> property.
>
> It's quite straightforward really, network operators are by far and away
> Nokia's biggest customer. Therefore Nokia does what the customer
> (network operator - you are merely an 'end-user') tell them to, and that
> usually includes directives along the lines of "thou shalt flash end-
> user handsets with whatever we tell thee to"
I know that, but once it is the customer's property I can't see why they
shouldn't replace the unwanted branded crap with the generic equivalent
without having the only official source of firmware updates refuse them
because their network operator has their head inserted in a privy orifice.
Luckily there are other ways of getting it done that involve paying people
other than the networks and the manufacturers. Should make you happy ;-)
--
Brian Morrison
please observe reply-to address
- 11-01-2004, 12:42 PM #13Richard ColtonGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
"Brian Morrison" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 09:21:08 +0000, in article
> <[email protected]> Jon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Brian Morrison reckoned that...
>>> Makes you wonder why Nokia care about what is done to a customer's own
>>> property.
>>
>> It's quite straightforward really, network operators are by far and away
>> Nokia's biggest customer. Therefore Nokia does what the customer
>> (network operator - you are merely an 'end-user') tell them to, and that
>> usually includes directives along the lines of "thou shalt flash end-
>> user handsets with whatever we tell thee to"
>
> I know that, but once it is the customer's property I can't see why they
> shouldn't replace the unwanted branded crap with the generic equivalent
> without having the only official source of firmware updates refuse them
> because their network operator has their head inserted in a privy orifice.
Couldn't agree more, but I can't see it changing in the near future.
--
>>> Unlock Your Phone's Potential <<<
>>> www.uselessinfo.org.uk <<<
>>> www.thephonelocker.co.uk <<<
>>> www.gsm-solutions.co.uk <<<
- 11-02-2004, 12:37 PM #14Brian MorrisonGuest
Re: NK 6600 upgraded from Orange 4.09.1 to generic 5.27.0!!
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 18:42:34 +0000, in article
<[email protected]> "Richard Colton"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> I know that, but once it is the customer's property I can't see why they
>> shouldn't replace the unwanted branded crap with the generic equivalent
>> without having the only official source of firmware updates refuse them
>> because their network operator has their head inserted in a privy orifice.
>
> Couldn't agree more, but I can't see it changing in the near future.
I somehow doubt that I'm on the shortlist for a marketing job at any
of the usual suspects' HQs
--
Brian Morrison
please observe reply-to address
Phones Discussed Above
More Nokia 6600 topics | Nokia Forum | Reviews |
Similar Threads
- Samsung
- Sony Ericsson
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.ericsson
Aws gpu
in Chit Chat