Results 61 to 75 of 91
- 07-04-2007, 08:17 AM #61George KerbyGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
On 7/2/07 12:43 PM, in article
[email protected], "Kevin Weaver"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Yours as well.
>
Top-posting dimwit, sorry. I don't speak retardese. Can you get someone to
translate into meaningful English before you post, please? You have that
certain nothing. Truly, you are about as interesting as watching a slug move
slowly across a large rock. You have the warm personal charm of a millipede
and about as much class as a bucket of mucous lodged on top of a dumpster in
a Blue Light district of New Jersey.
> "George Kerby" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:C2AE5F7C.2F5FA%[email protected]...
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/2/07 2:14 AM, in article
>> [email protected], "Kevin Weaver"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> There support does suck.
>>>
>> Yore command of English does suck two.
>>>>
>>>> Oxford wrote:
>>>>> "BruceR" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can understand and forgive a defective item but not the horrible
>>>>>>>> service I got from Apple which I'm sure that even you will have to
>>>>>>>> admit had nothing to do with having a PC or the OS used. In fact,
>>>>>>>> for the 3 weeks the thing worked, I had no trouble using iTunes.
>>>>>>>> It was just a bad battery, poor design in not being able to
>>>>>>>> replace it myself and awful service from the manufacturer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> when you sell 17,000+ of anything at day (even a loaf of bread)
>>>>>>> there can be 5-10 problems. Obviously a battery issue didn't take 4
>>>>>>> tries to fix, so you are completely lying there. But Apple does
>>>>>>> screw up and that's human.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apple just is the best by about 30% compared to any other PC Vendor
>>>>>>> for quality support. They truly care about what they make, it's not
>>>>>>> just a "product" for them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They didn't escalate it to "corporate" for a "proper" test, that
>>>>>>> completely is a lie (2nd one in your comments)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So just be honest and 99% of the time Apple fixes things on the very
>>>>>>> first try.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see, so when the facts don't fit your preconcieved notions just
>>>>>> accuse the poster of lying. For you to call me a liar is offensive
>>>>>> and uncalled for since you have no facts with which to challenge my
>>>>>> experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, if you lie, I'll call you on it. I just think being honest is a
>>>>> better approached. You CLEARED lied in 2 areas in your comment, so you
>>>>> were caught.
>>>>>
>>>>>> All
>>>>>> you have is a blind devotion to a corporation which you believe can
>>>>>> do no, or at least very little, wrong. I have no reason to lie about
>>>>>> my experience. In fact, I own Apple stock so I wish the company
>>>>>> nothing but success from customers such as yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> 4 times to fix a battery issue? nope! Escalate to "corporate", nope!
>>>>> those don't hold water, and I called you on it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I bought an Apple Mini and loaded up all my tunes from my PC with
>>>>>> no problem and enjoyed the unit for about a month. Then I found it
>>>>>> was dead. Charged it up till it said it was full. Without any use it
>>>>>> was dead again 3 days later. Went to online support, filled out the
>>>>>> forms and explained the problem. They sent a box, I sent it in. They
>>>>>> returned it a week later with a note saying that they updated the
>>>>>> firmware. Took the unit out of the box and it was dead. Charged it
>>>>>> up to full. Two days later it was dead again. Went online again.
>>>>>> Filled out form again and described problem again. They sent another
>>>>>> box. I sent it in again. They sent it back again with the same note.
>>>>>> It was dead again. I called and spoke to some one who made a note
>>>>>> that the unit should be replaced this (3d) time. Again a box
>>>>>> arrived, I sent it in and a week later the same unit came back with
>>>>>> the same note and was still dead. This time I called the corporate
>>>>>> office instead of service. They connected me with a guy who was very
>>>>>> apologetic and who, again, promised that a new unit would be sent
>>>>>> this, the 4th time. he gave me his direct number and told me that if
>>>>>> I did not get a new unit to call him direct and he would send one
>>>>>> himself. Box came, sent it back, and finally, on the 4th try, a
>>>>>> refurbed unit was sent. I posted the unit on ebay, sold it in 20
>>>>>> minutes and bought a simple to use, great sounding Sensa MP3 player.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is an Apple Mini? Right there you story doesn't make sense. If
>>>>> you mean iPod mini, it's clear the PC you were using was at fault, not
>>>>> Apple. Get a Mac and be done with it. Annoying Apple for your own poor
>>>>> choice of computing equipment seems like complaining to the wrong
>>>>> company. Call Redmond on this, not Cupertino.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't say that "they" escalated it to corporate - I did and it
>>>>>> worked. The guy that corporate transferred me to got it done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fair enough, I'll give you a bit of a pass on that one. That
>>>>> technically "could happen".
>>>>>
>>>>>> In case you'd like to research it further, it was an IPOD MINI
>>>>>> repair order: Apple Repair D5229302 and the time frame was summer
>>>>>> 2005. Oh, and by the way, you have STILL failed to answer my
>>>>>> questions.
>>>>>
>>>>> So this was back in 2005, that helps. Your number is valid, but your
>>>>> complaint seems to be tied to your PC, not the iPod mini.
>>>>
>>>> No, the complaint is clearly and only about the Mini not holding a
>>>> charge.
>>>> As I've said, it worked fine with the PC til it failed to hold a charge.
>>>> How did you check that anyway? I just tried and it's not even in their
>>>> system anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>> What questions did you ask?
>>>>>
>>>>> About the battery? You can easily replace the battery in an iPod.
>>>> It was under warranty - that's THEIR job. There's no battery door on a
>>>> mini anyway and I'm not about to pry the thing open when it's under
>>>> warranty.
>>>>>
>>>> It was an Apple iPOD Mini as I said earlier and further in the post. It
>>>> was not the fault of the PC - as I said earlier it wouldn't work with an
>>>> Apple Powerbook either. Now you're just rehashing your same old pep
>>>> rally.
>>>>
>>>> Have fun in your little Apple world and PLEASE keep buying more Apple
>>>> products - it helps keep the price of my Apple stock growing. ...and
>>>> you've STILL not explained how a PC could cause a battery problem (no,
>>>> the
>>>> USB ports on my SONY PC and my friend's Powerbook were not defective).
>>>>
>>>> This was simply a matter of a defective battery that was handled poorly
>>>> by
>>>> Apple support.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
› See More: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
- 07-04-2007, 08:21 AM #62George KerbyGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
On 7/2/07 12:48 PM, in article
[email protected], "Kevin Weaver"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes it is.
>
> If I were to say that it did not suck. Then what be posted then ?
> The company sucks. Can't paint it any brighter.
>
English is your second language, isn't it? You don't have a first. In
future, kindly proofread your posts before assaulting unsuspecting readers
of this message board with a litany of mis*****ings, egregious grammatical
errors, and other verbal atrocities.
When you go to the mind reader, do you get half price?
> "none" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Kevin Weaver" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> There support does suck.
>>
>> is English a new language for you? It's Their support does suck. (which
>> is technically not true.... but since you can't even write a correct
>> sentence, you wouldn't know how to judge support quality anyway)
>
- 07-04-2007, 09:25 AM #63TinmanGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
"George Kerby" wrote:
> "Kevin Weaver" wrote:
>
>> Yours as well.
>>
> Top-posting dimwit, sorry.
I am not a fan of top-posting. But if I had to choose between it and your
poor snipping habits I would choose top-posting any day. I stopped reading
your posts due to it and ironically only caught this one because you replied
to a top-poster. Of course you still didn't snip a damn thing (nor write
anything meaningful anyway--*****ing and language flames suck).
--
Mike
- 07-04-2007, 10:36 AM #64George KerbyGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
On 7/4/07 10:25 AM, in article [email protected], "Tinman"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> "George Kerby" wrote:
>> "Kevin Weaver" wrote:
>>
>>> Yours as well.
>>>
>> Top-posting dimwit, sorry.
>
> I am not a fan of top-posting. But if I had to choose between it and your
> poor snipping habits I would choose top-posting any day. I stopped reading
> your posts due to it and ironically only caught this one because you replied
> to a top-poster. Of course you still didn't snip a damn thing (nor write
> anything meaningful anyway--*****ing and language flames suck).
>
Whoopp-dee-doo, doo-doo head...
- 07-04-2007, 11:41 AM #65TinmanGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
"George Kerby" wrote:
> "Tinman" wrote:
>> I am not a fan of top-posting. But if I had to choose between it and your
>> poor snipping habits I would choose top-posting any day. I stopped reading
>> your posts due to it and ironically only caught this one because you replied
>> to a top-poster. Of course you still didn't snip a damn thing (nor write
>> anything meaningful anyway--*****ing and language flames suck).
>>
>Whoopp-dee-doo, doo-doo head...
"I don't speak retardese."
--
Mike | If a million monkeys typed on a million
| keyboards for a million years, eventually all
| the works of Shakespeare would be produced.
| Thanks to Usenet, we know this is not true.
- 07-04-2007, 11:47 AM #66NewsGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
Odd, since you just typed it.
Tinman wrote:
> "George Kerby" wrote:
>
>>"Tinman" wrote:
>>
>>>I am not a fan of top-posting. But if I had to choose between it and your
>>>poor snipping habits I would choose top-posting any day. I stopped reading
>>>your posts due to it and ironically only caught this one because you replied
>>>to a top-poster. Of course you still didn't snip a damn thing (nor write
>>>anything meaningful anyway--*****ing and language flames suck).
>>>
>>
>>Whoopp-dee-doo, doo-doo head...
>
>
> "I don't speak retardese."
>
>
- 07-04-2007, 11:55 AM #67TinmanGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:47:43 -0400, News <[email protected]> blabbered
incoherently:
>Odd, since you just typed it.
>
Not at all odd that you were incapable of seeing that it was a
cut-and-paste. Typical of the ADD-driven top-posting crowd...
--
Mike | Most people don't realize that large pieces
| of coral, painted brown and attached to the
| skull by common wood screws, can make a child
| look like a deer.
- 07-04-2007, 12:13 PM #68NewsGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
Typical RFC-bitten reply.
Tinman wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:47:43 -0400, News <[email protected]> blabbered
> incoherently:
>
>>Odd, since you just typed it.
>>
>
>
> Not at all odd that you were incapable of seeing that it was a
> cut-and-paste. Typical of the ADD-driven top-posting crowd...
>
- 07-04-2007, 01:04 PM #69Alan BakerGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
In article <[email protected]>,
Edwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jun 27, 3:09 pm, Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Okay, finally AT&T has posted the list of where you can (try) and get an
> > iPhone. Rumor is the highest volume sales stores will be allocated the
> > most, but there are only 3 million to be had over the first few days, so
> > it's going to be tough to get one.
> >
> > Good Luck!
> >
> > http://www.wireless.att.com/find-a-store/iphone/
> >
> > http://www.wireless.att.com/iphone/
>
> Now get out there and jack up the price of Oxford's Apple stock. Do
> you think he spends all his time spamming for Apple just for his
> health?
He hasn't posted spam.
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
- 07-04-2007, 01:38 PM #70BruceRGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
Alan Baker wrote:
>>
>> Now get out there and jack up the price of Oxford's Apple stock.
>> Do you think he spends all his time spamming for Apple just for his
>> health?
>
> He hasn't posted spam.
Agreed, but he has proven himself to be either an Apple employee or a
liar. You want proof, you say? When I posted the work order number from
an old email from Apple for the iPOD Mini with which I had had a bad
service experience he verified that the number I posted was correct and
discussed it's content. Even I, as the logged in customer, couldn't
find the work order status on their site (presumably they clear them
after a year or so) so for him to have access to their service order
archives he must be an employee or have some special status within
Apple. However, his reference to the content of the work order was dead
wrong so that would indicate that he's a liar. Either way, if not
spamming for Apple he's certainly a paid or unpaid cheerleader and
making his opinions irrelevent.
- 07-04-2007, 01:46 PM #71Alan BakerGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
In article <[email protected]>,
"BruceR" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Now get out there and jack up the price of Oxford's Apple stock.
> >> Do you think he spends all his time spamming for Apple just for his
> >> health?
> >
> > He hasn't posted spam.
>
> Agreed, but he has proven himself to be either an Apple employee or a
> liar. You want proof, you say? When I posted the work order number from
> an old email from Apple for the iPOD Mini with which I had had a bad
> service experience he verified that the number I posted was correct and
> discussed it's content. Even I, as the logged in customer, couldn't
> find the work order status on their site (presumably they clear them
> after a year or so) so for him to have access to their service order
> archives he must be an employee or have some special status within
> Apple. However, his reference to the content of the work order was dead
> wrong so that would indicate that he's a liar. Either way, if not
> spamming for Apple he's certainly a paid or unpaid cheerleader and
> making his opinions irrelevent.
And may we see this post of yours...
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
- 07-04-2007, 02:03 PM #72EdwinGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
On Jul 4, 2:46 pm, Alan Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
>
>
>
> "BruceR" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Alan Baker wrote:
>
> > >> Now get out there and jack up the price of Oxford's Apple stock.
> > >> Do you think he spends all his time spamming for Apple just for his
> > >> health?
>
> > > He hasn't posted spam.
>
> > Agreed, but he has proven himself to be either an Apple employee or a
> > liar. You want proof, you say? When I posted the work order number from
> > an old email from Apple for the iPOD Mini with which I had had a bad
> > service experience he verified that the number I posted was correct and
> > discussed it's content. Even I, as the logged in customer, couldn't
> > find the work order status on their site (presumably they clear them
> > after a year or so) so for him to have access to their service order
> > archives he must be an employee or have some special status within
> > Apple. However, his reference to the content of the work order was dead
> > wrong so that would indicate that he's a liar. Either way, if not
> > spamming for Apple he's certainly a paid or unpaid cheerleader and
> > making his opinions irrelevent.
>
> And may we see this post of yours...
Sure, right after you produce that post where the Mayor said Apple was
going out of business...
- 07-04-2007, 02:04 PM #73Alan BakerGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
In article <[email protected]>,
Edwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2:46 pm, Alan Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> >
> >
> >
> > "BruceR" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Alan Baker wrote:
> >
> > > >> Now get out there and jack up the price of Oxford's Apple stock.
> > > >> Do you think he spends all his time spamming for Apple just for his
> > > >> health?
> >
> > > > He hasn't posted spam.
> >
> > > Agreed, but he has proven himself to be either an Apple employee or a
> > > liar. You want proof, you say? When I posted the work order number from
> > > an old email from Apple for the iPOD Mini with which I had had a bad
> > > service experience he verified that the number I posted was correct and
> > > discussed it's content. Even I, as the logged in customer, couldn't
> > > find the work order status on their site (presumably they clear them
> > > after a year or so) so for him to have access to their service order
> > > archives he must be an employee or have some special status within
> > > Apple. However, his reference to the content of the work order was dead
> > > wrong so that would indicate that he's a liar. Either way, if not
> > > spamming for Apple he's certainly a paid or unpaid cheerleader and
> > > making his opinions irrelevent.
> >
> > And may we see this post of yours...
>
> Sure, right after you produce that post where the Mayor said Apple was
> going out of business...
Over and done with.
Unlike your claim that had given a total price for a Sprint phone and
service plan...
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
- 07-04-2007, 02:18 PM #74EdwinGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
On Jul 4, 3:04 pm, Alan Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
>
>
>
> Edwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jul 4, 2:46 pm, Alan Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > In article <[email protected]>,
>
> > > "BruceR" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Alan Baker wrote:
>
> > > > >> Now get out there and jack up the price of Oxford's Apple stock.
> > > > >> Do you think he spends all his time spamming for Apple just for his
> > > > >> health?
>
> > > > > He hasn't posted spam.
>
> > > > Agreed, but he has proven himself to be either an Apple employee or a
> > > > liar. You want proof, you say? When I posted the work order number from
> > > > an old email from Apple for the iPOD Mini with which I had had a bad
> > > > service experience he verified that the number I posted was correct and
> > > > discussed it's content. Even I, as the logged in customer, couldn't
> > > > find the work order status on their site (presumably they clear them
> > > > after a year or so) so for him to have access to their service order
> > > > archives he must be an employee or have some special status within
> > > > Apple. However, his reference to the content of the work order was dead
> > > > wrong so that would indicate that he's a liar. Either way, if not
> > > > spamming for Apple he's certainly a paid or unpaid cheerleader and
> > > > making his opinions irrelevent.
>
> > > And may we see this post of yours...
>
> > Sure, right after you produce that post where the Mayor said Apple was
> > going out of business...
>
> Over and done with.
No it's not. You can't hand wave it away.
When you demanded quotes from me that there was no way I could Google
up, you said it was my problem to produce the quotes. So you go
ahead and find one of those quotes that you said there were more of
than anybody could count.
> Unlike your claim that had given a total price for a Sprint phone and
> service plan...
It's not like that at all.
- 07-04-2007, 02:26 PM #75EdwinGuest
Re: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.
On Jul 4, 2:04 pm, Alan Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
>
>
>
> Edwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jun 27, 3:09 pm, Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Okay, finally AT&T has posted the list of where you can (try) and get an
> > > iPhone. Rumor is the highest volume sales stores will be allocated the
> > > most, but there are only 3 million to be had over the first few days, so
> > > it's going to be tough to get one.
>
> > > Good Luck!
>
> > >http://www.wireless.att.com/find-a-store/iphone/
>
> > >http://www.wireless.att.com/iphone/
>
> > Now get out there and jack up the price of Oxford's Apple stock. Do
> > you think he spends all his time spamming for Apple just for his
> > health?
>
> He hasn't posted spam.
And the Sun rises in the West, and up is down, and black is white...
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.verizon
Lifeline cell phone service
in Chit Chat