Results 1 to 11 of 11
- 01-26-2004, 04:25 PM #1Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Testing ...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAFZPu1p0e3NXsrtERAlvaAJsF9rfxVFv+Det4Ll6R6NIy1UZpwQCgs0bU
EicklbEU9v2PiJxl2Flw4nM=
=wGoo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
› See More: How about this one 2
- 01-26-2004, 05:00 PM #2Sergey KalabekovGuest
Re: How about this one 2
Hello Thomas,
On 26 Jan 2004 22:25:51 GMT you [TTV] typed:
TTV> Testing ...
....and where would someone get your public key to verify your sig?
--
Sergey
- 01-26-2004, 05:03 PM #3Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: How about this one 2
On 26 Jan 2004 22:25:51 GMT, "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Testing ...
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
>
>iD8DBQFAFZPu1p0e3NXsrtERAlvaAJsF9rfxVFv+Det4Ll6R6NIy1UZpwQCgs0bU
>EicklbEU9v2PiJxl2Flw4nM=
>=wGoo
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pardon this post ... this was not intended to go to the group.
Tom Veldhouse
- 01-26-2004, 07:36 PM #4Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: How about this one 2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sergey Kalabekov <[email protected]> wrote:
: Hello Thomas,
:
: On 26 Jan 2004 22:25:51 GMT you [TTV] typed:
:
: TTV> Testing ...
:
: ...and where would someone get your public key to verify your sig?
:
In the standard places ... keyserver.net is one. It should be availble
in other locations soon if it is not already. I decided that it might
be wise to sign my posts because there are at least two people here that
occassionally pretend to be other people and at least once it has
happened to me. I will also send the key with this post.
- --
Thomas T. Veldhouse
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAFcCG1p0e3NXsrtERAuyUAJ9Dxd3kUE0Q6Cg+SFuW+ZKWyPXSNQCeLhVZ
PO155IvoNavwMmg0pZu8jQk=
=GWuO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)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=9Fy6
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
- 01-26-2004, 10:55 PM #5Scott NelsonGuest
Re: How about this one 2
If you have the PGP software installed, just search the ldap server for his
e-mail address that he used in the digital sig.
www.pgp.com the website with the software. Not sure of there is a free
version available anymore though.....
Scotty
"Sergey Kalabekov" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hello Thomas,
>
> On 26 Jan 2004 22:25:51 GMT you [TTV] typed:
>
> TTV> Testing ...
>
> ...and where would someone get your public key to verify your sig?
>
> --
> Sergey
>
- 01-26-2004, 11:06 PM #6Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: How about this one 2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Scott Nelson <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you have the PGP software installed, just search the ldap server for his
> e-mail address that he used in the digital sig.
>
> www.pgp.com the website with the software. Not sure of there is a free
> version available anymore though.....
>
> Scotty
>
>
Actually, I use GNU Privacy Guard ... it is free. There are license
issues and security problems, not to mention system stablity trouble
with the latest versions of PGP for Windows.
- --
Thomas T. Veldhouse
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAFfG31p0e3NXsrtERAtGnAJ0V6A2cgNQWq7ANlsdS2YIEojZRdgCdHTG1
MRLMZbC2NbBMuwR2BWmoEDg=
=4lLv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- 01-26-2004, 11:16 PM #7Scott NelsonGuest
Re: How about this one 2
I have PGP for Macintosh and so far ( knock on wood ) don't have any issues.
I have older versions for both Winblows and Mac OS'es.
But I digress Off-topic......... ;-)
Scotty
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Scott Nelson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If you have the PGP software installed, just search the ldap server for
his
> > e-mail address that he used in the digital sig.
> >
> > www.pgp.com the website with the software. Not sure of there is a free
> > version available anymore though.....
> >
> > Scotty
> >
> >
>
> Actually, I use GNU Privacy Guard ... it is free. There are license
> issues and security problems, not to mention system stablity trouble
> with the latest versions of PGP for Windows.
>
> - --
>
> Thomas T. Veldhouse
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQFAFfG31p0e3NXsrtERAtGnAJ0V6A2cgNQWq7ANlsdS2YIEojZRdgCdHTG1
> MRLMZbC2NbBMuwR2BWmoEDg=
> =4lLv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- 01-27-2004, 06:10 AM #8Sergey KalabekovGuest
Re: How about this one 2
Hello Scott,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:55:57 -0500 you [SN] typed:
SN> If you have the PGP software installed, just search the ldap
SN> server for his e-mail address that he used in the digital sig.
I did and failed. Yet today, I tried to search the ldap servers again
and succeeded.
--
Sergey
- 01-27-2004, 04:19 PM #9daveGuest
Re: How about this one 2
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Actually, I use GNU Privacy Guard ... it is free. There are license
> issues and security problems, not to mention system stablity trouble
> with the latest versions of PGP for Windows.
Wouldn't everyone in the whole alt.cellular.sprinpcs usenet group have
to use pgp for all to know for sure who they were talking to?
This gets confusing. Wouldn't I have to download pgp to verify your
true identity? Did I read somewhere your public key is suposed to be
sort of secret also?
Dave
- 01-27-2004, 04:53 PM #10Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: How about this one 2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
"dave" <> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't everyone in the whole alt.cellular.sprinpcs usenet group have
> to use pgp for all to know for sure who they were talking to?
>
> This gets confusing. Wouldn't I have to download pgp to verify your
> true identity? Did I read somewhere your public key is suposed to be
> sort of secret also?
>
> Dave
>
You only need to use PGP to determine if the identity of who posted the
message is real. Essentially, it would only be required if in doubt.
However, I have been impersonated here once and others here have more
than once, so simply signing each message to this group pretty much
guarentees you can prove that it wasn't you that posted a fradulent
message, since the fraud would have no way of signing a message using your
key.
- --
Thomas T. Veldhouse
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAFuv01p0e3NXsrtERAtqEAKCfQmAKr2/VdlQXKyv04iekdK0NvQCfQd65
Jj7s8i8WQuiqY4Dlt1VWsjE=
=OMw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- 01-30-2004, 09:54 PM #11norelprefGuest
Re: How about this one 2
dave wrote:
>Wouldn't I have to download pgp to verify your
> true identity?
If you were concered about verifing, then yes. Almost every PGP tool or
package has a populated list of common key servers to use for uploading,
signing, and verifying keys, one example is http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371
where Tom's is at. Most usenet software does not provide a hook into
PGP so you would have to do it manually. Worth it to some people.
PGP should be used more often but it tips the scales for most when
balancing ease of use and security. Catch-22 here also, not many people
use it or think they need it so most email apps and usenet readers do
not support it directly. If you use a native application that supports
it well directly or even a third party add-on for your application, the
PGP operation is seemless and works very good.
Did I read somewhere your public key is suposed to be
> sort of secret also?
>
No, that is why it is a public key
Very basic PGP overview:
http://www.andrebacard.com/pgp.html
Similar Threads
- LG
- Apple (iPhone)
- alt.cellular.attws
- Samsung
- Games
¿Quién edita la foto?
in Chit Chat