Motorola V60V Now available from Telesales

Bob

No, it an error with goggle post but again, please project your
opinion as fact (again)

now don't you feel better admitting that when you posted "give us a
break it never happened" you where just guessing.

Ron

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> "Ron" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Bob
> >
> > Why don't you just admit that you state things (aggressively) as facts
> > when you are just guessing
>
> <snipped>
>
> Hmmm, run out of things to say Ron, posting the same message 3 times?
>
> This argument of ours has gone on way to long. I've already said numerous
> times, I never saw it @ $199. I was guessing, that it could have been typo,
> before I ever went to sprintpcsinfo.com.
>
> End of story and my last contribution to this thread.
>
> Bob

---

› See More: Motorola V60V Now available from Telesales

"Ron" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Bob
>
> No, it an error with goggle post but again, please project your
> opinion as fact (again)
>
> now don't you feel better admitting that when you posted "give us a
> break it never happened" you where just guessing.
>
> Ron

Nope, as I was under the impression it was always $249 ...

Bob

Keep guessing Bob once in a while you are bound to be right.... again
there is a job for you in the Bush administration


"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> "Ron" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Bob
> >
> > No, it an error with goggle post but again, please project your
> > opinion as fact (again)
> >
> > now don't you feel better admitting that when you posted "give us a
> > break it never happened" you where just guessing.
> >
> > Ron
>
> Nope, as I was under the impression it was always $249 ...
>
> Bob

[email protected] (Ron) wrote:
> Keep guessing Bob once in a while you are
> bound to be right.... again
> there is a job for you in the Bush
> administration

So does that mean you have taken up all the jobs in the Kerry
administration? Bet there were a lot of vacancies there. After all, he
voted for it before he voted against it.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Eric) wrote:

> [email protected] (Ron) wrote:
> > Keep guessing Bob once in a while you are
> > bound to be right.... again
> > there is a job for you in the Bush
> > administration
>
> So does that mean you have taken up all the jobs in the Kerry
> administration? Bet there were a lot of vacancies there. After all, he
> voted for it before he voted against it.

Kerry is not the one who went AWOL from a Desk Job.

[email protected] (Ron) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Larry
>
> Can I ask is Vision and 1X the same thing? I was wondering about
> hooking it up to a laptop (airports, etc...). Given my last phone was
> a p8767 I Vision has not been on my radar screen
>
> I keep toying with going over to Verizon but Sprnt is so much cheaper
> for me, aside from list price being less the association discounts on
> Sprint are bigger on Sprint (10%).
>
> Ron

1X is another term for 3rd generation compatible which a phone has to
be in order to be capable of Vision. But some of the phones (such as
the Motorola V60V and Nokia 3588i) have Vision disabled.

Røbert M wrote:

> RIGHT - you have your own definition for everything, and your own UNIQUE
> rules for usenet.

As do you, the difference is his definition and rules mirror those
accepted by the majority and your don't.


Frank

I have you noticed my posts not being consistent?

An additional aside, don't take a "Bush" camp snippet from a
commercial as truth. Or for that matter much of anything they say as
the "whole truth".

What appears to be a good bill is voted against for different, and
valid, reasons. For example someone tags on billions of unrelated pork
for their pals, so a no vote also includes the message, "send us a
clean bill". Often the pork is attached just to make it easy to attack
the person who votes no, knowing that most people, like you for
example, don't really follow what is going on and only listen to the
30 second propaganda snippets.

For example, recently congress told Bush he does not get a blank
check, if he wants another check with 10 zeros he needs to provide
some details. Not unreasonable considering how far off track the war
has gone.

BTW I support our troops 120% and believe we MUST succeed. I don't
believe Bush understands how to succeed. He fires or ignores anyone
who tells him the "emperor has no cloths" then claims bad intelligence
when he finds out he is naked.


[email protected] (Eric) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> [email protected] (Ron) wrote:
> > Keep guessing Bob once in a while you are
> > bound to be right.... again
> > there is a job for you in the Bush
> > administration
>
> So does that mean you have taken up all the jobs in the Kerry
> administration? Bet there were a lot of vacancies there. After all, he
> voted for it before he voted against it.

Larry

Acutally I don't thing Vision is really 3G, more like 2.5G is what I
think I read.

There are some true 3G high speed networks but there are just getting
to the USA. KDDI (Japan) did great with their high speed. In fact it
was a huge turn-around for thier company. I think DoCoMo is still
stuggleing to get decent 3G fielded. 3G EV-DO was a huge win for KDDI
/ Motorola (KDDI is 100% Motorala network).

I think Verizon and Sprint are both looking at deploying the same
equipment here in the USA. Verizon has some high speed in spot areas
but I though I heard them say it would be a national thing by end of
year.

Ron

[email protected] (Larry Thomas) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> [email protected] (Ron) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> > Larry
> >
> > Can I ask is Vision and 1X the same thing? I was wondering about
> > hooking it up to a laptop (airports, etc...). Given my last phone was
> > a p8767 I Vision has not been on my radar screen
> >
> > I keep toying with going over to Verizon but Sprnt is so much cheaper
> > for me, aside from list price being less the association discounts on
> > Sprint are bigger on Sprint (10%).
> >
> > Ron
>
> 1X is another term for 3rd generation compatible which a phone has to
> be in order to be capable of Vision. But some of the phones (such as
> the Motorola V60V and Nokia 3588i) have Vision disabled.

[email protected] (Ron) wrote:
> I have you noticed my posts not being
> consistent?

No idea what that statement means.

> Often the pork is attached just to make it easy
> to attack the person who votes no, knowing
> that most people, like you for example, don't
> really follow what is going on and only listen
> to the 30 second propaganda snippets.

I follow politics *very* closely. All I was making a comment on was
that this thread is about a Motorola phone, and you consistantly talking
about Bush and politics in a cell phone group and thread. Its sad when
one cannot just talk and discuss a topic without throwing some stupid
political nonsense like "there's a place for you in the Bush
administration" about every other post.

"Ron" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> BTW I support our troops 120% and believe we MUST succeed. I don't
> believe Bush understands how to succeed. He fires or ignores anyone
> who tells him the "emperor has no cloths" then claims bad intelligence
> when he finds out he is naked.

Monday morning quarterbacking is real easy to do but not very
helpful. I haven't seen any of the Bush critics come up with a
better plan on how to run the war in Iraq.

--

John Richards

[email protected] (Ron) wrote:
> Acutally I don't thing Vision is really 3G, more
> like 2.5G is what I think I read.

Where did you read this at? That would be interesting to take a look
at, because everything I have read or participated in discussions with
have implied that Vision is indeed 3G. Not saying that you are
incorrect Ron -- its difficult to say things on usenet without it being
construed as confrontational -- but it would be intriguing to read
something that stated otherwise.

Eric

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Eric) wrote:

> [email protected] (Ron) wrote:
> > I have you noticed my posts not being
> > consistent?
>
> No idea what that statement means.
>
> > Often the pork is attached just to make it easy
> > to attack the person who votes no, knowing
> > that most people, like you for example, don't
> > really follow what is going on and only listen
> > to the 30 second propaganda snippets.
>
> I follow politics *very* closely. All I was making a comment on was
> that this thread is about a Motorola phone, and you consistantly talking
> about Bush and politics in a cell phone group and thread. Its sad when
> one cannot just talk and discuss a topic without throwing some stupid
> political nonsense like "there's a place for you in the Bush
> administration" about every other post.

The soon to be Lame Duck Bush administration.

(John=A0Richards) wrote:
> Monday morning quarterbacking is real easy
> to do but not very helpful. I haven't seen any
> of the Bush critics come up with a better plan
> on how to run the war in Iraq.

That is the same way I feel about these ridiculous 9/11 hearings and
such. I am all for finding better ways to avoid such tragedies or
training our police/firefighters on how to handle situations like that
better... but going back and trying to place blame on people involved on
that day because "they didn't act fast enough" or "they should have done
this" or "should have done that" is insulting and absurd. The images of
people hecking former the New York Mayor made me sick... *he* didn't
cause 9/11... he was stunned and shocked like everyone else. Nobody
had ever faced a challenge like that... it was a few hours of sheer
panic... and to place blame on someone or a group of people is
ridiculous.

Eric

[email protected] (Robert=A0M) wrote:
> The soon to be Lame Duck Bush
> administration.

Can I take this that you do not like George W. Bush? I personally
cannot wait until election, but am still undecided as to who to vote
for.

Eric