SPRINT PCS - another cutback ??

One of the real pluses for Sprint PCS has been one's ability to check
their usage via *4 and on the web. It had been steadily improving
through April 2004 when it seemed near real time. In May it went back to
2003 status of being hours behind, and on Memorial Day it was not
updated at all. Not minutes used, not credits issued.

Any Sprint PCS employees with FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what's going on?
Have there been layoffs, and/or is this the first evidence of IBM taking
over?

---

› See More: SPRINT PCS - another cutback ??

My account is up to date.
It was within an hour or two of being up to date yesterday and Sunday as
well, for me anyway.

Maybe an glitch in your area?

Scotty


"Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> One of the real pluses for Sprint PCS has been one's ability to check
> their usage via *4 and on the web. It had been steadily improving
> through April 2004 when it seemed near real time. In May it went back to
> 2003 status of being hours behind, and on Memorial Day it was not
> updated at all. Not minutes used, not credits issued.
>
> Any Sprint PCS employees with FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what's going on?
> Have there been layoffs, and/or is this the first evidence of IBM taking
> over?

In article <[email protected]>,
"Scott Nelson - Wash DC" <[email protected]> wrote:

> My account is up to date.
> It was within an hour or two of being up to date yesterday and Sunday as
> well, for me anyway.
>
> Maybe an glitch in your area?
>
> Scotty

You are only confirming what I posted. It was near real time in April, a
few hours behind in May, and not recorded at all on Monday, which you
didnt report on.


>
>
> "Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > One of the real pluses for Sprint PCS has been one's ability to check
> > their usage via *4 and on the web. It had been steadily improving
> > through April 2004 when it seemed near real time. In May it went back to
> > 2003 status of being hours behind, and on Memorial Day it was not
> > updated at all. Not minutes used, not credits issued.
> >
> > Any Sprint PCS employees with FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what's going on?
> > Have there been layoffs, and/or is this the first evidence of IBM taking
> > over?

Uh, yesterday was Monday. ;-)

Scotty


"Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Scott Nelson - Wash DC" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > My account is up to date.
> > It was within an hour or two of being up to date yesterday and Sunday as
> > well, for me anyway.
> >
> > Maybe an glitch in your area?
> >
> > Scotty
>
> You are only confirming what I posted. It was near real time in April, a
> few hours behind in May, and not recorded at all on Monday, which you
> didnt report on.
>
>
> >
> >
> > "Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > One of the real pluses for Sprint PCS has been one's ability to check
> > > their usage via *4 and on the web. It had been steadily improving
> > > through April 2004 when it seemed near real time. In May it went back
to
> > > 2003 status of being hours behind, and on Memorial Day it was not
> > > updated at all. Not minutes used, not credits issued.
> > >
> > > Any Sprint PCS employees with FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what's going on?
> > > Have there been layoffs, and/or is this the first evidence of IBM
taking
> > > over?

Something wierd going on. Finally, late this morning, my credits are all
showing up ,
BUT...

(not that it matters), the web site is now showing fewer Night and Weekend
unlimited minutes used.

"Nebby" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Something wierd going on. Finally, late this morning, my credits are all
> showing up ,
> BUT...
>
> (not that it matters), the web site is now showing fewer Night and Weekend
> unlimited minutes used.

Using multiple IDs to reply in the same thread again Phillipe ...? Geez, you
take the cake.

Bob

(Bob=A0Smith) wrote:
> Geez, you
> take the cake.

As long as its not Angel's Food Cake. That's my favorite.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Eric) wrote:

> ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Geez, you
> > take the cake.
>
> As long as its not Angel's Food Cake. That's my favorite.

Too many carbs.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"R?bert M." <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> As long as its not Angel's Food Cake. That's my favorite.
>
> Too many carbs.

Then you definitely qualify as a CARB in this newsgroup.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAvM9D1p0e3NXsrtERAh3zAKCrDE9Ej/cgUN7M99D03GHDjXvElQCgmF+T
tvqiBHD4xC72LSHEwNxvmkY=
=blaG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

(R=F8bert=A0M.) wrote:
> Too many carbs.

I don't care about carbs. I love food.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Eric) wrote:

> (Røbert*M.) wrote:
> > Too many carbs.
>
> I don't care about carbs. I love food.

Then you and the guy who saved $20 can go to the Mexican Restaurant in
Denver.

(R=F8bert=A0M.) wrote:
> Then you and the guy who saved $20 can go
> to the Mexican Restaurant in Denver.

I don't eat mexican food.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Eric) wrote:

> (Røbert*M.) wrote:
> > Then you and the guy who saved $20 can go
> > to the Mexican Restaurant in Denver.
>
> I don't eat mexican food.

We're even. I don't eat Japanese food.

(R=F8bert=A0M.) wrote:
> We're even. I don't eat Japanese food.

Is it Japanese food or Chinese food that you can eat and then be hungry
again in 20 minutes?

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Eric) wrote:

> (Røbert*M.) wrote:
> > We're even. I don't eat Japanese food.
>
> Is it Japanese food or Chinese food that you can eat and then be hungry
> again in 20 minutes?

In my case, I can eat anything, and then eat again 20 minutes later.