For O/Siris - JD Powers explanation

Justin wrote:
> "O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
> news:IpA5b.260810$cF.82748@rwcrnsc53...
>> Justin wrote:
>>
>>> So, out of what, six posts, only one could be somewhat construed as
>>> addressing the thread's topic. The rest were drivel. You asked for
>>> information before you would discuss the study, I posted some info,
>>> info you wanted, and then I get these six posts.
>>>
>>> It just seems like you'd rather not discuss the study. Which is
>>> fine. Don't. I could care less. And if a particular thread is
>>> about the study, and you want to point out where, in other threads,
>>> you've discussed it, that is fine as well. I shouldn't have to go
>>> digging for them. That's the point of a thread - to have a
>>> discussion. If you don't want to repeat yourself, don't. Just
>>> don't post a bunch of drivel as well.
>>
>> As usual, Justin, you can't extend your vision beyond your own
>> particular example.
>
> Huh? I just give you information you request. You *still* have not
> discussed the survey or the information I provided for you. In fact,
> I think your exact words were, "So what?".
>
> Either you want to discuss it, or you want to post drivel. It's
> pretty obvious you don't like the study. If you don't want to
> discuss it, why do you keep responding to posts concerning it?
>
>
>> Go beyond that, and you descend into inanity. You posted
>> information, for which I even went so far as to thank you, and YOU
>
> Again, your exact words were "Good. So what?".
>
>
>
>> not I,
>> are the one who descended into insults and personal attacks. You
>> sought to "get" me by posting what I asked. Apparently, you are
>> unable to accept the appreciation I expressed for being given what I
>> said the press release did not.
>
> You are paranoid. I sought to "get" you? I sought to provide you
> with information YOU asked for so you might discuss the actual topic.
> You are really paranoid. They have drugs that can help with that.
> If you wear your feelings so far out on your sleeve that you think I
> have personally attacked you, you should seek a therapist. It must
> be painful going through life being so easily offended.
>
>> I notice the accusations continue, and still not a request to
>> discuss. Apparently, to you, I am at fault for not anticipating your
>> expectation of "discussion."
>
> Really?
>
> This ENTIRE POST was to give YOU information YOU asked for so YOU
> could/would discuss the issue. It's laughable to think that you're
> waiting for some written invitation to comment, when you post so
> freely in other threads without being asked. And your response?
> "Good. So what?"
>
> I can understand your unwillingness to discuss the study since it
> disparages your employer so.

Hogwash, Justin. Now you're mixing up threads.
--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint
I *don't* speak for them

---

› See More: For O/Siris - JD Powers explanation

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:hlK5b.355131$uu5.69698@sccrnsc04...
> Justin wrote:
> > "O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
> > news:IpA5b.260810$cF.82748@rwcrnsc53...
> >> Justin wrote:
> >>
> >>> So, out of what, six posts, only one could be somewhat construed as
> >>> addressing the thread's topic. The rest were drivel. You asked for
> >>> information before you would discuss the study, I posted some info,
> >>> info you wanted, and then I get these six posts.
> >>>
> >>> It just seems like you'd rather not discuss the study. Which is
> >>> fine. Don't. I could care less. And if a particular thread is
> >>> about the study, and you want to point out where, in other threads,
> >>> you've discussed it, that is fine as well. I shouldn't have to go
> >>> digging for them. That's the point of a thread - to have a
> >>> discussion. If you don't want to repeat yourself, don't. Just
> >>> don't post a bunch of drivel as well.
> >>
> >> As usual, Justin, you can't extend your vision beyond your own
> >> particular example.
> >
> > Huh? I just give you information you request. You *still* have not
> > discussed the survey or the information I provided for you. In fact,
> > I think your exact words were, "So what?".
> >
> > Either you want to discuss it, or you want to post drivel. It's
> > pretty obvious you don't like the study. If you don't want to
> > discuss it, why do you keep responding to posts concerning it?
> >
> >
> >> Go beyond that, and you descend into inanity. You posted
> >> information, for which I even went so far as to thank you, and YOU
> >
> > Again, your exact words were "Good. So what?".
> >
> >
> >
> >> not I,
> >> are the one who descended into insults and personal attacks. You
> >> sought to "get" me by posting what I asked. Apparently, you are
> >> unable to accept the appreciation I expressed for being given what I
> >> said the press release did not.
> >
> > You are paranoid. I sought to "get" you? I sought to provide you
> > with information YOU asked for so you might discuss the actual topic.
> > You are really paranoid. They have drugs that can help with that.
> > If you wear your feelings so far out on your sleeve that you think I
> > have personally attacked you, you should seek a therapist. It must
> > be painful going through life being so easily offended.
> >
> >> I notice the accusations continue, and still not a request to
> >> discuss. Apparently, to you, I am at fault for not anticipating your
> >> expectation of "discussion."
> >
> > Really?
> >
> > This ENTIRE POST was to give YOU information YOU asked for so YOU
> > could/would discuss the issue. It's laughable to think that you're
> > waiting for some written invitation to comment, when you post so
> > freely in other threads without being asked. And your response?
> > "Good. So what?"
> >
> > I can understand your unwillingness to discuss the study since it
> > disparages your employer so.
>
> Hogwash, Justin. Now you're mixing up threads.
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint
> I *don't* speak for them
>

No I'm not. In any case, you're still not discussing the info I posted.
You're having a child's arguement to get you out of discussing it.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:XjK5b.352281$Ho3.52852@sccrnsc03...
> Justin wrote:
> >> It's really simple, Justin. You want something from me, ASK for it.
> >> heck, I'm not even all that picky about how you ask. But if you lie
> >> about what I've said, as Philly has done every single time he's
> >> quoted me, then you're going to get called the liar you are.
> >> --
> >
> > Most of your posts in this thread immediately after I posted the
> > information (YOU said you needed in order to discuss the survey) were
> > not actual discussions of the survey.
>
> That's disingenuous at best, Justin. My INITIAL response was a thank you.
> You didn't solicit a response, you didn't ask me a single question.
>
> So, for about the fourth time, was I supposed to anticipate what you
wanted?
>
>
> >
> > So, out of what, six posts, only one could be somewhat construed as
> > addressing the thread's topic. The rest were drivel. You asked for
> > information before you would discuss the study, I posted some info,
> > info you wanted, and then I get these six posts.
>
> And not ONE of the posts to which I was responding actually asked me a
> single thing, requested a single response as feedback to the study. Only
> empty and generic complaints that I haven't responded. That's just silly,
> Justin. Yet again, I remind you, if you want a response, ASK FOR IT.

I think you were saying you would discuss it days ago when this information
wasn't known. You kept making excuses as to why you were refusing to
discuss is. I took away your excuse.

> > It just seems like you'd rather not discuss the study. Which is fine.
> > Don't. I could care less. And if a particular thread is about the
> > study, and you want to point out where, in other threads, you've
> > discussed it, that is fine as well. I shouldn't have to go digging
> > for them. That's the point of a thread - to have a discussion. If
> > you don't want to repeat yourself, don't. Just don't post a bunch of
> > drivel as well.
>
> I'm not the one posting false accusations, Justin. Stop accusing and
start
> asking.

What false accusations? I posted info which you have YET to discuss in this
thread.

goodeye18 wrote in <[email protected]>:

>
>Justin do you seriously have no life? Its ridiculous you feel like you
>have to prove someone wrong.

Why are you sniveling? Everyone knows SprintPCS reps are
frighteningly stupid and incompetent, and this is hard evidence that
they are the worst in the business. Hard to think of a post that
could be more relevant to a sprintpcs newsgroup. Why don't you get
back on the phone and mishandle another *2 call instead of stalking
aggravated customers here?

O/Siris wrote in <QaP4b.247713$Oz4.66446@rwcrnsc54>:

>Good. So what? I was simply pointing out that the press release provided
>none of this information.
>
>Thank you for the added information.

Too funny. "Thank you for the added information." Well at least
you're going through the motions of caring whether or not SprintPCS
reps are considered useless, incompetent assholes by SprintPCS
customers.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:XjK5b.352281$Ho3.52852@sccrnsc03...
> Justin wrote:
> >> It's really simple, Justin. You want something from me, ASK for it.
> >> heck, I'm not even all that picky about how you ask. But if you lie
> >> about what I've said, as Philly has done every single time he's
> >> quoted me, then you're going to get called the liar you are.
> >> --
> >
> > Most of your posts in this thread immediately after I posted the
> > information (YOU said you needed in order to discuss the survey) were
> > not actual discussions of the survey.
>
> That's disingenuous at best, Justin. My INITIAL response was a thank you.
> You didn't solicit a response, you didn't ask me a single question.
>
> So, for about the fourth time, was I supposed to anticipate what you
wanted?
>
>
> >
> > So, out of what, six posts, only one could be somewhat construed as
> > addressing the thread's topic. The rest were drivel. You asked for
> > information before you would discuss the study, I posted some info,
> > info you wanted, and then I get these six posts.
>
> And not ONE of the posts to which I was responding actually asked me a
> single thing, requested a single response as feedback to the study. Only
> empty and generic complaints that I haven't responded. That's just silly,
> Justin. Yet again, I remind you, if you want a response, ASK FOR IT.
>
> >
> > It just seems like you'd rather not discuss the study. Which is fine.
> > Don't. I could care less. And if a particular thread is about the
> > study, and you want to point out where, in other threads, you've
> > discussed it, that is fine as well. I shouldn't have to go digging
> > for them. That's the point of a thread - to have a discussion. If
> > you don't want to repeat yourself, don't. Just don't post a bunch of
> > drivel as well.
>
> I'm not the one posting false accusations, Justin. Stop accusing and
start
> asking.
> --

Oh, and P.S. - you never did tell me how we are abusing the system by trying
to contact someone at the company who might be able to help.

O/Siris wrote in <2ZT4b.328799$Ho3.48502@sccrnsc03>:

>Justin Green wrote:
>> "O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
>> news:QaP4b.247713$Oz4.66446@rwcrnsc54...
>>> Good. So what? I was simply pointing out that the press release
>>> provided none of this information.
>>>
>>> Thank you for the added information.
>>> --
>>> -+-
>>> RØß
>>> O/Siris
>>> I work for Sprint
>>> I cheerlead for them
>>
>> And now that you have some information, you continue to respond to
>> posts without actually discussing them. Makes me wonder who the real
>> troll is.
>
>Snivelling little hypocrite. What question did you ask me? What response
>did you request? It was information, and you said you posted it for me. I
>thanked you for it. Now you want to pretend it was something more?
>
>Why don't you say what you want, for once, instead of expecting people to
>figure it out.
>
>You want a response from me? Discussion? Then do some of it yourself. You
>want to pretend you "got" me? Go for it. You "got" me. I said there was
>no information, and I was 100% accurate in that characterization of of the
>JDPA press release. Someone else has done a more detailed report on the
>study. Great.
>
>What, *exactly*, do you want from me?

Some kind of violent suicide involving a shotgun would be nice.

In article <[email protected]>,
Steve Hanson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Some kind of violent suicide involving a shotgun would be nice.

Can't we all just be friends?

about the up sale thing, when i call, they always offer me long
distance, or balance notification? are they stupid? i can check my
balance just fine online or on the phone, and as for long distance,
does not sprint offer long distance? they are on crack, sorry.

--
Posted at SprintUsers.com - Your place for everything Sprint PCS
Free wireless access @ www.SprintUsers.com/wap

"Steve Hanson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Too funny. "Thank you for the added information." Well at least
> you're going through the motions of caring whether or not SprintPCS
> reps are considered useless, incompetent assholes by SprintPCS
> customers.

Man .. who are you and where did you come from? Ah .. nevermind. Plonk!

Tom Veldhouse

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Steve Hanson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Too funny. "Thank you for the added information." Well at least
> > you're going through the motions of caring whether or not SprintPCS
> > reps are considered useless, incompetent assholes by SprintPCS
> > customers.
>
> Man .. who are you and where did you come from? Ah .. nevermind. Plonk!
>
> Tom Veldhouse


I bet when you come to the boards, you don't see but about three posts. One
from O/Siris and two from yourself, one posting drivel and the other
defending the drivel.

"RemusRM" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> about the up sale thing, when i call, they always offer me long
> distance, or balance notification? are they stupid? i can check my
> balance just fine online or on the phone, and as for long distance,
> does not sprint offer long distance? they are on crack, sorry.
>

Uhm ... they are offering you long distance on your home [landline] phone.
50 free minutes per month (plus fees and more fees and a proprietary $1.99
recovery fee ... .they are always recovering something).

Tom Veldhouse

Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>
>"Steve Hanson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> Too funny. "Thank you for the added information." Well at least
>> you're going through the motions of caring whether or not SprintPCS
>> reps are considered useless, incompetent assholes by SprintPCS
>> customers.
>
>Man .. who are you and where did you come from? Ah .. nevermind. Plonk!
>
>Tom Veldhouse
>
I wonder if this means that ****head here is going to start a thread
saying he's killfiled me and then going on and on for ****ING DAYS
about how happy he is about it. Hell, I might even warrant an honored
place in his personal shrine to Phillipe.

Phillipe wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> Steve Hanson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Some kind of violent suicide involving a shotgun would be nice.
>
>Can't we all just be friends?

No.

"Steve Hanson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote in
> <[email protected]>:
>
> >
> >"Steve Hanson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >> Too funny. "Thank you for the added information." Well at least
> >> you're going through the motions of caring whether or not SprintPCS
> >> reps are considered useless, incompetent assholes by SprintPCS
> >> customers.
> >
> >Man .. who are you and where did you come from? Ah .. nevermind. Plonk!
> >
> >Tom Veldhouse
> >
> I wonder if this means that ****head here is going to start a thread
> saying he's killfiled me and then going on and on for ****ING DAYS
> about how happy he is about it. Hell, I might even warrant an honored
> place in his personal shrine to Phillipe.

Yeah, the general consensus here is:

If you're pro-Sprint - you are mature.
If you're anti-Sprint - you're a troll.

While, in reality, people on both sides are acting immature, me included at
this point, it's funny to see people claim to be taking the "high road" and
killfile someone, then gloat about it in a new thread.

In fact, Tom brags about kill-filing people who disagree with him.

I've learned that the nature of usenet is to nitpick others. I started out
seriously on this board until people began to nitpick my two threads about
Sprint PCS, calling my complaints invalid and having a "gotcha" attitude.
Which is fine. It's immature, but fine. Now, as I've said, I'll stick
around and rebut their immaturity in kind... for entertainment, until I'm
100% sure Sprint is going to uphold their end of their agreement on my final
bill.