Why Sprint should fire Rob and others like him.

I have to assume that you are too pathetic to answer the questions. You
cannot point to where I lied, after calling me a liar no less than a dozen
times.

I can also conclude, absent any input from you (as previously requested),
that you called me a liar because you didn't like what I had posted about
Sprint PCS. Your defense of Sprint, although rather obtuse, is formed by
attacking someone. Much like politicians do, you make a claim and do not
back it up, letting the mere fact that you're made the accusation stand as
some sort of evidence that I must be lying, in hopes that it would somehow
discredit what I've posted. After repeated requests, which you continually
avoid, you still are not able or willing to back up your claims in any way,
even continuing the accusations.

Furthermore, your refusal to acknowledge that Sprint ranked last in the JD
Powers survey, along with the other JD Power critics, shows you to be quite
incapable of honest discussion. Your repeated demands for the exact
results, questions, formats, and methods of the study lead me to believe
that you are attempting to also discredit the JD Powers study in a similar
manner.

You've failed. It's your attitude that is problematic at Sprint. After
repeated complaints that I was dropping calls, not once could a Sprint
customer rep admit that there was inadequate network coverage in my area.
They continually said "You are receiving service in Little Elm," apparently
under the assumption that if they told me this enough times, I would go
away. Much in the same way you assume that if you call me a liar enough,
others will start to believe it.

I'm not sure if Sprint's interviewing process strives to find people with
your attitudes or if they do something to you after you've been there to
bring out these attitudes. In either case, they stink. It will and most
likely has cost Sprint customers.

I can be an honest person and discuss anything you'd like. I've had
absolutely NO reason to lie about anything since I've been here. But you
and the others (Bob, Lawrence, Isaiah, etc.) who continually nitpick anyone
with a problem with Sprint makes you look rather sad, pathetic, and
grasping.

Now, unless you can have an intelligent conversation about the above, you're
essentially making Sprint look bad, and that's about it.

---

› See More: Why Sprint should fire Rob and others like him.

this is a hell of a thing to say about Sprint's employee of the month ----
actually, it's rather shocking.

"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I have to assume that you are too pathetic to answer the questions. You
> cannot point to where I lied, after calling me a liar no less than a dozen
> times.
>
> I can also conclude, absent any input from you (as previously requested),
> that you called me a liar because you didn't like what I had posted about
> Sprint PCS. Your defense of Sprint, although rather obtuse, is formed by
> attacking someone. Much like politicians do, you make a claim and do not
> back it up, letting the mere fact that you're made the accusation stand as
> some sort of evidence that I must be lying, in hopes that it would somehow
> discredit what I've posted. After repeated requests, which you
continually
> avoid, you still are not able or willing to back up your claims in any
way,
> even continuing the accusations.
>
> Furthermore, your refusal to acknowledge that Sprint ranked last in the JD
> Powers survey, along with the other JD Power critics, shows you to be
quite
> incapable of honest discussion. Your repeated demands for the exact
> results, questions, formats, and methods of the study lead me to believe
> that you are attempting to also discredit the JD Powers study in a similar
> manner.
>
> You've failed. It's your attitude that is problematic at Sprint. After
> repeated complaints that I was dropping calls, not once could a Sprint
> customer rep admit that there was inadequate network coverage in my area.
> They continually said "You are receiving service in Little Elm,"
apparently
> under the assumption that if they told me this enough times, I would go
> away. Much in the same way you assume that if you call me a liar enough,
> others will start to believe it.
>
> I'm not sure if Sprint's interviewing process strives to find people with
> your attitudes or if they do something to you after you've been there to
> bring out these attitudes. In either case, they stink. It will and most
> likely has cost Sprint customers.
>
> I can be an honest person and discuss anything you'd like. I've had
> absolutely NO reason to lie about anything since I've been here. But you
> and the others (Bob, Lawrence, Isaiah, etc.) who continually nitpick
anyone
> with a problem with Sprint makes you look rather sad, pathetic, and
> grasping.
>
> Now, unless you can have an intelligent conversation about the above,
you're
> essentially making Sprint look bad, and that's about it.
>
>

<<Now, unless you can have an intelligent conversation about the above,
you're essentially making Sprint look bad, and that's about it. >>

Nah, I think Sprint is making Sprint look bad all on its own.

Eric

"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
> I have to assume that you are too pathetic to answer the questions. You
> cannot point to where I lied, after calling me a liar no less than a dozen
> times.
>
> I can also conclude, absent any input from you (as previously requested),
> that you called me a liar because you didn't like what I had posted about
> Sprint PCS.

You've been told repeatedly, Justin. And you still can't accurately
report what I've said.

> Your defense of Sprint, although rather obtuse, is formed by
> attacking someone.

Interesting. No attack of Sam, or of moonraker, or of Betz... And you
still can't accurately report what I've said about the survey, even
after repeated corrections. And then you take offense at being called a
liar.

"If it walks like a duck..."

>Much like politicians do, you make a claim and do not
> back it up, letting the mere fact that you're made the accusation stand as
> some sort of evidence that I must be lying, in hopes that it would somehow
> discredit what I've posted. After repeated requests, which you continually
> avoid, you still are not able or willing to back up your claims in any way,
> even continuing the accusations.

And still you can't accurately describe what I've been saying. I've
repeatedly acknowledged the final conclusions of the study, I've NEVER
questioned them. I simply stated, accurately, that I could not discuss
what that conlusion was based on because JD Power would not say.

You've got a funny way of proving your honesty, Justin. By falsely
representing what I've said. Hmm.

>
> Furthermore, your refusal to acknowledge that Sprint ranked last in the JD
> Powers survey,

I've never *not* acknowledged it, Justin. What *has* happened is that
I've been asked about it, and I've simply and accurately reported that
we have no way of knowing how Sprint fared in the individual categories
that make up the final conclusion. Once again, you fail to accurately
report what I've said.

> along with the other JD Power critics, shows you to be quite
> incapable of honest discussion. Your repeated demands for the exact
> results, questions, formats, and methods of the study lead me to believe
> that you are attempting to also discredit the JD Powers study in a similar
> manner.

I've repeatedly said I don't disagree with its conclusions, Justin. And
you've repeatedly and dishonestly characterized that as "bashing" the
survey. Here's the REAL truth: I don't have a problem with the survey.
I just haven't read it for myself. Neither, in fact, have you.

>
> You've failed. It's your attitude that is problematic at Sprint.

I can't fail at something I've never attempted, Justin.

> After
> repeated complaints that I was dropping calls, not once could a Sprint
> customer rep admit that there was inadequate network coverage in my area.
> They continually said "You are receiving service in Little Elm," apparently
> under the assumption that if they told me this enough times, I would go
> away.

A story long ago acknowledged as you being treated badly. I still say
something appears to be missing from it, but, unlike your
characterization, I've never accused you of lying about it. Never.

> Much in the same way you assume that if you call me a liar enough,
> others will start to believe it.

More dishonesty. You are so eager and ready to assume and presume, and
then take offense when your own tactics are returned in kind.

>
> I'm not sure if Sprint's interviewing process strives to find people with
> your attitudes or if they do something to you after you've been there to
> bring out these attitudes. In either case, they stink. It will and most
> likely has cost Sprint customers.

That's why I have Customer-driven awards every single month I've worked
here, because I'm driving them away. Sure, Justin.

>
> I can be an honest person and discuss anything you'd like.

Except, apparently, what I say.

> I've had
> absolutely NO reason to lie about anything since I've been here.

That's the part that's been so troubling. You're right, there's no
reason for it.

> But you
> and the others (Bob, Lawrence, Isaiah, etc.)

Just out of curiosity, Justin, how many people have to tell you that
you're doing something wrong before you admit to it? How long does
"etc" have to be before MAYBE you begin to think there's a point being
made that's valid?

> who continually nitpick anyone
> with a problem with Sprint makes you look rather sad, pathetic, and
> grasping.

Hmm... what did I nitpick about Betz's claim posted after this? Or
about moonraker? Or Sam? I asked Sam for specifics, but I never
denied, nit-picked, or equivocated what happened to him. Do you *maybe*
see the point?

>
> Now, unless you can have an intelligent conversation about the above, you're
> essentially making Sprint look bad, and that's about it.

Look in the mirror when you post that. If you're looking honestly, you
won't like what it reveals.

--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

[posted via phonescoop.com]

"O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> > I have to assume that you are too pathetic to answer the questions. You
> > cannot point to where I lied, after calling me a liar no less than a
dozen
> > times.
> >
> > I can also conclude, absent any input from you (as previously
requested),
> > that you called me a liar because you didn't like what I had posted
about
> > Sprint PCS.
>
> You've been told repeatedly, Justin. And you still can't accurately
> report what I've said.


That's bull. Post a link or shut the hell up. The fact that you can't even
post a link PROVES my post to be accurate.


> > Your defense of Sprint, although rather obtuse, is formed by
> > attacking someone.
>
> Interesting. No attack of Sam, or of moonraker, or of Betz... And you
> still can't accurately report what I've said about the survey, even
> after repeated corrections. And then you take offense at being called a
> liar.
>
> "If it walks like a duck..."

Yeah, your accusations "walk" like lies. From the utter lack of response to
repeated questions, you must be full of it.


> >Much like politicians do, you make a claim and do not
> > back it up, letting the mere fact that you're made the accusation stand
as
> > some sort of evidence that I must be lying, in hopes that it would
somehow
> > discredit what I've posted. After repeated requests, which you
continually
> > avoid, you still are not able or willing to back up your claims in any
way,
> > even continuing the accusations.
>
> And still you can't accurately describe what I've been saying. I've
> repeatedly acknowledged the final conclusions of the study, I've NEVER
> questioned them. I simply stated, accurately, that I could not discuss
> what that conlusion was based on because JD Power would not say.
>
> You've got a funny way of proving your honesty, Justin. By falsely
> representing what I've said. Hmm.

I have proven my honesty. You STILL can't post ANYTHING I lied about in my
story. Post it Rob, PROVE me wrong. No more of this "You're a liar" crap
with no back up.


> >
> > Furthermore, your refusal to acknowledge that Sprint ranked last in the
JD
> > Powers survey,
>
> I've never *not* acknowledged it, Justin. What *has* happened is that
> I've been asked about it, and I've simply and accurately reported that
> we have no way of knowing how Sprint fared in the individual categories
> that make up the final conclusion. Once again, you fail to accurately
> report what I've said.

Your intent is to downplay the survey by not discussing it, which any human
being would be able to have a conversation about the results. You cannot.


> > along with the other JD Power critics, shows you to be quite
> > incapable of honest discussion. Your repeated demands for the exact
> > results, questions, formats, and methods of the study lead me to believe
> > that you are attempting to also discredit the JD Powers study in a
similar
> > manner.
>
> I've repeatedly said I don't disagree with its conclusions, Justin. And
> you've repeatedly and dishonestly characterized that as "bashing" the
> survey. Here's the REAL truth: I don't have a problem with the survey.
> I just haven't read it for myself. Neither, in fact, have you.

You've never acknowledged the conclusions, and further, you've hinted at the
fact that you don't believe Sprint finished last, claiming that Alltel
finished worse in some markets.


> >
> > You've failed. It's your attitude that is problematic at Sprint.
>
> I can't fail at something I've never attempted, Justin.

Yes, you continually call someone a liar without posting any proof
whatsoever.


> > After
> > repeated complaints that I was dropping calls, not once could a Sprint
> > customer rep admit that there was inadequate network coverage in my
area.
> > They continually said "You are receiving service in Little Elm,"
apparently
> > under the assumption that if they told me this enough times, I would go
> > away.
>
> A story long ago acknowledged as you being treated badly. I still say
> something appears to be missing from it, but, unlike your
> characterization, I've never accused you of lying about it. Never.

And yet you STILL posted that I lied about parts of it, parts of which you
cannot even list. You also said I refused to take blame for any of it, yet
you cannot list anything for which I was to blame. List them and prove me
wrong you tool.


> > Much in the same way you assume that if you call me a liar enough,
> > others will start to believe it.
>
> More dishonesty. You are so eager and ready to assume and presume, and
> then take offense when your own tactics are returned in kind.


Blah blah blah blah. That is ALL you've done. Liar this, dishonesty that,
NO PROOF. Post some PROOF, Rob, or you're doing EXACTLY said you do in my
original post, which is call someone a liar and run away without backing up
your fabricated claims.

> >
> > I'm not sure if Sprint's interviewing process strives to find people
with
> > your attitudes or if they do something to you after you've been there to
> > bring out these attitudes. In either case, they stink. It will and
most
> > likely has cost Sprint customers.
>
> That's why I have Customer-driven awards every single month I've worked
> here, because I'm driving them away. Sure, Justin.

That says exactly how sad a shape Sprint is in if YOU have won awards.


> >
> > I can be an honest person and discuss anything you'd like.
>
> Except, apparently, what I say.

What, that I'm a liar? You offer absolutely NO PROOF. What's to discuss?
The fact that you sound like a damned broken record:

more dishonesty
liar
more dishonesty
liar

See? No proof. Again, I'll challenge you to put up or shut up. Show some
proof.


> > I've had
> > absolutely NO reason to lie about anything since I've been here.
>
> That's the part that's been so troubling. You're right, there's no
> reason for it.

And I haven't lied about anything. Again, YOU can't even freaking list what
you think I may have lied about, FURTHER showing yourself to be a troll and
a fabricating loser.


> > But you
> > and the others (Bob, Lawrence, Isaiah, etc.)
>
> Just out of curiosity, Justin, how many people have to tell you that
> you're doing something wrong before you admit to it? How long does
> "etc" have to be before MAYBE you begin to think there's a point being
> made that's valid?

Again, WHAT THE **** did I do wrong? See, here you go, another ****ing
accusation with NO PROOF or even an incident. Typical of your trolling
responses.


> > who continually nitpick anyone
> > with a problem with Sprint makes you look rather sad, pathetic, and
> > grasping.
>
> Hmm... what did I nitpick about Betz's claim posted after this? Or
> about moonraker? Or Sam? I asked Sam for specifics, but I never
> denied, nit-picked, or equivocated what happened to him. Do you *maybe*
> see the point?

Let's talk about MY posts where you said I lied in my story. Why can't you
talk about that you lunatic?

> >
> > Now, unless you can have an intelligent conversation about the above,
you're
> > essentially making Sprint look bad, and that's about it.
>
> Look in the mirror when you post that. If you're looking honestly, you
> won't like what it reveals.

Post the proof, Rob. You made and claim, now back it up.


> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint PCS
> I *don't* speak for them
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]

"O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> > I have to assume that you are too pathetic to answer the questions. You
> > cannot point to where I lied, after calling me a liar no less than a
dozen
> > times.
> >
> > I can also conclude, absent any input from you (as previously
requested),
> > that you called me a liar because you didn't like what I had posted
about
> > Sprint PCS.
>
> You've been told repeatedly, Justin. And you still can't accurately
> report what I've said.
>
> > Your defense of Sprint, although rather obtuse, is formed by
> > attacking someone.
>
> Interesting. No attack of Sam, or of moonraker, or of Betz... And you
> still can't accurately report what I've said about the survey, even
> after repeated corrections. And then you take offense at being called a
> liar.
>
> "If it walks like a duck..."
>
> >Much like politicians do, you make a claim and do not
> > back it up, letting the mere fact that you're made the accusation stand
as
> > some sort of evidence that I must be lying, in hopes that it would
somehow
> > discredit what I've posted. After repeated requests, which you
continually
> > avoid, you still are not able or willing to back up your claims in any
way,
> > even continuing the accusations.
>
> And still you can't accurately describe what I've been saying. I've
> repeatedly acknowledged the final conclusions of the study, I've NEVER
> questioned them. I simply stated, accurately, that I could not discuss
> what that conlusion was based on because JD Power would not say.
>
> You've got a funny way of proving your honesty, Justin. By falsely
> representing what I've said. Hmm.
>
> >
> > Furthermore, your refusal to acknowledge that Sprint ranked last in the
JD
> > Powers survey,
>
> I've never *not* acknowledged it, Justin. What *has* happened is that
> I've been asked about it, and I've simply and accurately reported that
> we have no way of knowing how Sprint fared in the individual categories
> that make up the final conclusion. Once again, you fail to accurately
> report what I've said.
>
> > along with the other JD Power critics, shows you to be quite
> > incapable of honest discussion. Your repeated demands for the exact
> > results, questions, formats, and methods of the study lead me to believe
> > that you are attempting to also discredit the JD Powers study in a
similar
> > manner.
>
> I've repeatedly said I don't disagree with its conclusions, Justin. And
> you've repeatedly and dishonestly characterized that as "bashing" the
> survey. Here's the REAL truth: I don't have a problem with the survey.
> I just haven't read it for myself. Neither, in fact, have you.
>
> >
> > You've failed. It's your attitude that is problematic at Sprint.
>
> I can't fail at something I've never attempted, Justin.
>
> > After
> > repeated complaints that I was dropping calls, not once could a Sprint
> > customer rep admit that there was inadequate network coverage in my
area.
> > They continually said "You are receiving service in Little Elm,"
apparently
> > under the assumption that if they told me this enough times, I would go
> > away.
>
> A story long ago acknowledged as you being treated badly. I still say
> something appears to be missing from it, but, unlike your
> characterization, I've never accused you of lying about it. Never.
>
> > Much in the same way you assume that if you call me a liar enough,
> > others will start to believe it.
>
> More dishonesty. You are so eager and ready to assume and presume, and
> then take offense when your own tactics are returned in kind.
>
> >
> > I'm not sure if Sprint's interviewing process strives to find people
with
> > your attitudes or if they do something to you after you've been there to
> > bring out these attitudes. In either case, they stink. It will and
most
> > likely has cost Sprint customers.
>
> That's why I have Customer-driven awards every single month I've worked
> here, because I'm driving them away. Sure, Justin.
>
> >
> > I can be an honest person and discuss anything you'd like.
>
> Except, apparently, what I say.
>
> > I've had
> > absolutely NO reason to lie about anything since I've been here.
>
> That's the part that's been so troubling. You're right, there's no
> reason for it.
>
> > But you
> > and the others (Bob, Lawrence, Isaiah, etc.)
>
> Just out of curiosity, Justin, how many people have to tell you that
> you're doing something wrong before you admit to it? How long does
> "etc" have to be before MAYBE you begin to think there's a point being
> made that's valid?
>
> > who continually nitpick anyone
> > with a problem with Sprint makes you look rather sad, pathetic, and
> > grasping.
>
> Hmm... what did I nitpick about Betz's claim posted after this? Or
> about moonraker? Or Sam? I asked Sam for specifics, but I never
> denied, nit-picked, or equivocated what happened to him. Do you *maybe*
> see the point?
>
> >
> > Now, unless you can have an intelligent conversation about the above,
you're
> > essentially making Sprint look bad, and that's about it.
>
> Look in the mirror when you post that. If you're looking honestly, you
> won't like what it reveals.
>
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint PCS
> I *don't* speak for them
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]



Another example of ROB claiming that someone is lying without offering ANY
proof.

In article <[email protected]>,
"tom ronson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> this is a hell of a thing to say about Sprint's employee of the month ----
> actually, it's rather shocking.

rob has called the most people "liar" the most times to win that, I
guess.

In case you were just tuning in, Phill. and Justin are two moronic
trolls that just lie and bash about people who are here to help
others.

---
www.sprintpcsinfo.com
A troll-free zone.

--
Posted at SprintUsers.com - Your place for everything Sprint PCS
Free wireless access @ www.SprintUsers.com/wap

"hatoncat" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> In case you were just tuning in, Phill. and Justin are two moronic
> trolls that just lie and bash about people who are here to help
> others.
>
> ---
> www.sprintpcsinfo.com
> A troll-free zone.
>
> --
> Posted at SprintUsers.com - Your place for everything Sprint PCS
> Free wireless access @ www.SprintUsers.com/wap
>


Hey, why don't you go **** yourself? Bigoted *****.

Justin Green wrote:
> *"hatoncat" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > In case you were just tuning in, Phill. and Justin are two moronic
> > trolls that just lie and bash about people who are here to help
> > others.
> >
> > ---
> > www.sprintpcsinfo.com
> > A troll-free zone.
> >
> > --
> > Posted at SprintUsers.com - Your place for everything Sprint PCS
> > Free wireless access @ www.SprintUsers.com/wap
> >
>
>
> Hey, why don't you go f*ck yourself? Bigoted b*tch. *

In case you were just tuning in, Phill. and Justin are two moronic
trolls that just lie and bash about people who are here to help
others.

---
www.sprintpcsinfo.com
A troll-free zone.

--
Posted at SprintUsers.com - Your place for everything Sprint PCS
Free wireless access @ www.SprintUsers.com/wap

"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> > <[email protected]>:
> > > I have to assume that you are too pathetic to answer the questions.
You
> > > cannot point to where I lied, after calling me a liar no less than a
> dozen
> > > times.
> > >
> > > I can also conclude, absent any input from you (as previously
> requested),
> > > that you called me a liar because you didn't like what I had posted
> about
> > > Sprint PCS.
> >
> > You've been told repeatedly, Justin. And you still can't accurately
> > report what I've said.
> >
> > > Your defense of Sprint, although rather obtuse, is formed by
> > > attacking someone.
> >
> > Interesting. No attack of Sam, or of moonraker, or of Betz... And you
> > still can't accurately report what I've said about the survey, even
> > after repeated corrections. And then you take offense at being called a
> > liar.
> >
> > "If it walks like a duck..."
> >
> > >Much like politicians do, you make a claim and do not
> > > back it up, letting the mere fact that you're made the accusation
stand
> as
> > > some sort of evidence that I must be lying, in hopes that it would
> somehow
> > > discredit what I've posted. After repeated requests, which you
> continually
> > > avoid, you still are not able or willing to back up your claims in any
> way,
> > > even continuing the accusations.
> >
> > And still you can't accurately describe what I've been saying. I've
> > repeatedly acknowledged the final conclusions of the study, I've NEVER
> > questioned them. I simply stated, accurately, that I could not discuss
> > what that conlusion was based on because JD Power would not say.
> >
> > You've got a funny way of proving your honesty, Justin. By falsely
> > representing what I've said. Hmm.
> >
> > >
> > > Furthermore, your refusal to acknowledge that Sprint ranked last in
the
> JD
> > > Powers survey,
> >
> > I've never *not* acknowledged it, Justin. What *has* happened is that
> > I've been asked about it, and I've simply and accurately reported that
> > we have no way of knowing how Sprint fared in the individual categories
> > that make up the final conclusion. Once again, you fail to accurately
> > report what I've said.
> >
> > > along with the other JD Power critics, shows you to be quite
> > > incapable of honest discussion. Your repeated demands for the exact
> > > results, questions, formats, and methods of the study lead me to
believe
> > > that you are attempting to also discredit the JD Powers study in a
> similar
> > > manner.
> >
> > I've repeatedly said I don't disagree with its conclusions, Justin. And
> > you've repeatedly and dishonestly characterized that as "bashing" the
> > survey. Here's the REAL truth: I don't have a problem with the survey.
> > I just haven't read it for myself. Neither, in fact, have you.
> >
> > >
> > > You've failed. It's your attitude that is problematic at Sprint.
> >
> > I can't fail at something I've never attempted, Justin.
> >
> > > After
> > > repeated complaints that I was dropping calls, not once could a Sprint
> > > customer rep admit that there was inadequate network coverage in my
> area.
> > > They continually said "You are receiving service in Little Elm,"
> apparently
> > > under the assumption that if they told me this enough times, I would
go
> > > away.
> >
> > A story long ago acknowledged as you being treated badly. I still say
> > something appears to be missing from it, but, unlike your
> > characterization, I've never accused you of lying about it. Never.
> >
> > > Much in the same way you assume that if you call me a liar enough,
> > > others will start to believe it.
> >
> > More dishonesty. You are so eager and ready to assume and presume, and
> > then take offense when your own tactics are returned in kind.
> >
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if Sprint's interviewing process strives to find people
> with
> > > your attitudes or if they do something to you after you've been there
to
> > > bring out these attitudes. In either case, they stink. It will and
> most
> > > likely has cost Sprint customers.
> >
> > That's why I have Customer-driven awards every single month I've worked
> > here, because I'm driving them away. Sure, Justin.
> >
> > >
> > > I can be an honest person and discuss anything you'd like.
> >
> > Except, apparently, what I say.
> >
> > > I've had
> > > absolutely NO reason to lie about anything since I've been here.
> >
> > That's the part that's been so troubling. You're right, there's no
> > reason for it.
> >
> > > But you
> > > and the others (Bob, Lawrence, Isaiah, etc.)
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, Justin, how many people have to tell you that
> > you're doing something wrong before you admit to it? How long does
> > "etc" have to be before MAYBE you begin to think there's a point being
> > made that's valid?
> >
> > > who continually nitpick anyone
> > > with a problem with Sprint makes you look rather sad, pathetic, and
> > > grasping.
> >
> > Hmm... what did I nitpick about Betz's claim posted after this? Or
> > about moonraker? Or Sam? I asked Sam for specifics, but I never
> > denied, nit-picked, or equivocated what happened to him. Do you *maybe*
> > see the point?
> >
> > >
> > > Now, unless you can have an intelligent conversation about the above,
> you're
> > > essentially making Sprint look bad, and that's about it.
> >
> > Look in the mirror when you post that. If you're looking honestly, you
> > won't like what it reveals.
> >
> > --
> > -+-
> > RØß
> > O/Siris
> > I work for Sprint PCS
> > I *don't* speak for them
> >
> > [posted via phonescoop.com]
>
>
>
> Another example of ROB claiming that someone is lying without offering ANY
> proof.
>
> Justin dude you are pathetic, get a life! Is that what you do with your
free time freak? Mom he called me a liar........Mom (or in this case a bunch
of people who really do not give a ****) he hurt my feelings. Grow up dude
you are so incredibly boring. Can I please ask that everyone post a follow
up in agreement? Never mind, who cares.....

In article <[email protected]>,
"Roger" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Justin dude you are pathetic, get a life! Is that what you do with your
> free time freak? Mom he called me a liar........Mom (or in this case a bunch
> of people who really do not give a ****) he hurt my feelings. Grow up dude
> you are so incredibly boring. Can I please ask that everyone post a follow
> up in agreement? Never mind, who cares.....


Instead of posting yoiur obscene language, use a filter if you have a
problem with Justin. He is just one of many that SprintPCS treated
poorly.

>
> "hatoncat" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > In case you were just tuning in, Phill. and Justin are two moronic
> > trolls that just lie and bash about people who are here to help
> > others.
> >
> > ---
> > www.sprintpcsinfo.com
> > A troll-free zone.
> >
> > --
> > Posted at SprintUsers.com - Your place for everything Sprint PCS
> > Free wireless access @ www.SprintUsers.com/wap
> >

Hatoncat is one of the few SprintPCS apologists that bash anyone (and
regretably there are SO MANY) that have a problem with the abysmal
SPRINTPCS Customer Service, rated last by Consumer Reports and JD Power.

And by posting his editorial opinion so many times he has become a TROLL.

Phill. wrote:
> *
> >
> > "hatoncat" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > In case you were just tuning in, Phill. and Justin are two
> moronic
> > > trolls that just lie and bash about people who are here to help
> > > others.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > www.sprintpcsinfo.com
> > > A troll-free zone.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Posted at SprintUsers.com - Your place for everything Sprint PCS
> > > Free wireless access @ www.SprintUsers.com/wap
> > >
>
> Hatoncat is one of the few SprintPCS apologists that bash anyone
> (and
> regretably there are SO MANY) that have a problem with the abysmal
> SPRINTPCS Customer Service, rated last by Consumer Reports and JD
> Power.
>
> And by posting his editorial opinion so many times he has become a
> TROLL. *

In case you were just tuning in, Phill. and Justin are two moronic
trolls that just lie and bash about people who are here to help others.


---
www.sprintpcsinfo.com
A troll-free zone.

--
Posted at SprintUsers.com - Your place for everything Sprint PCS
Free wireless access @ www.SprintUsers.com/wap

Hatoncat childishly gets into name calling:

> In case you were just tuning in, Phill. and Justin are two > moronic trolls
that just lie and bash about people who > are here to help others.

This post sure helps folks.

This definitely helps things. NOT

Maybe cat was out drinking with OSirius.