Results 1 to 6 of 6
- 07-24-2003, 09:27 PM #1JosephGuest
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:53:32 GMT, John Navas
<[email protected]> wrote:
>[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:10:50
>-0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 05:44:00 GMT, John Navas
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul
>>>2003 02:49:46 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In Northern California AT&T GSM is
>>>>better than Cingular's GSM ...
>>>
>>>Not true.
>>
>>Why is it that your experience is the only one that counts?
>
>My experience isn't the only one that counts -- what would make you think
>that?
Your two word reply.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Replies are seldom read. Please reply in the group
› See More: Cingular Satisfaction & Coverage
- 07-24-2003, 09:34 PM #2John NavasGuest
Re: Cingular Satisfaction & Coverage
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:27:31
-0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:53:32 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:10:50
>>-0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 05:44:00 GMT, John Navas
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul
>>>>2003 02:49:46 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In Northern California AT&T GSM is
>>>>>better than Cingular's GSM ...
>>>>
>>>>Not true.
>>>
>>>Why is it that your experience is the only one that counts?
>>
>>My experience isn't the only one that counts -- what would make you think
>>that?
>
>Your two word reply.
You must have a powerful imagination.
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/> HELP PAGES FOR
CINGULAR GSM + ERICSSON PHONES: <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 07-25-2003, 01:10 PM #3JosephGuest
Re: Cingular Satisfaction & Coverage
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 03:34:56 GMT, John Navas
<[email protected]> wrote:
>[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:27:31
>-0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:53:32 GMT, John Navas
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:10:50
>>>-0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 05:44:00 GMT, John Navas
>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul
>>>>>2003 02:49:46 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In Northern California AT&T GSM is
>>>>>>better than Cingular's GSM ...
>>>>>
>>>>>Not true.
>>>>
>>>>Why is it that your experience is the only one that counts?
>>>
>>>My experience isn't the only one that counts -- what would make you think
>>>that?
>>
>>Your two word reply.
>
>You must have a powerful imagination.
You should read for comprehension. You cannot read the words *not
true?* You give your little smug answers and with attitude for days.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Replies are seldom read. Please reply in the group
- 07-25-2003, 01:23 PM #4John NavasGuest
Re: Cingular Satisfaction & Coverage
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:10:38
-0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 03:34:56 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>
>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:27:31
>>-0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:53:32 GMT, John Navas
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:10:50
>>>>-0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 05:44:00 GMT, John Navas
>>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul
>>>>>>2003 02:49:46 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In Northern California AT&T GSM is
>>>>>>>better than Cingular's GSM ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Not true.
>>>>>
>>>>>Why is it that your experience is the only one that counts?
>>>>
>>>>My experience isn't the only one that counts -- what would make you think
>>>>that?
>>>
>>>Your two word reply.
>>
>>You must have a powerful imagination.
>
>You should read for comprehension. ...
I do, but thanks for your concern.
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/> HELP PAGES FOR
CINGULAR GSM + ERICSSON PHONES: <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 07-25-2003, 02:31 PM #5Jared RobinsonGuest
Re: Cingular Satisfaction & Coverage
What's even funnier is that John lives in a bubble. Cingular is
definitely superior.
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:10:38
> -0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 03:34:56 GMT, John Navas
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
> >>
> >>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:27:31
> >>-0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:53:32 GMT, John Navas
> >>><[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:10:50
> >>>>-0700, Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 05:44:00 GMT, John Navas
> >>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 24 Jul
> >>>>>>2003 02:49:46 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>In Northern California AT&T GSM is
> >>>>>>>better than Cingular's GSM ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Not true.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Why is it that your experience is the only one that counts?
> >>>>
> >>>>My experience isn't the only one that counts -- what would make you think
> >>>>that?
> >>>
> >>>Your two word reply.
> >>
> >>You must have a powerful imagination.
> >
> >You should read for comprehension. You cannot read the words *not true?* You give your little smug answers and with attitude for days.
>
> I do, but thanks for your concern.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/> HELP PAGES FOR
> CINGULAR GSM + ERICSSON PHONES: <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
[posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups]
- 07-25-2003, 03:51 PM #6John S.Guest
Re: Cingular Satisfaction & Coverage
>What's even funnier is that John lives in a bubble. Cingular is
>definitely superior.
>
>John Navas
And what have oyu been smoking in that closed area that you call your
"reality"????
--
John S.
e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.attws
- Cingular
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
Desnudar fotos
in General Cell Phone Forum