T610 awarded "Best phone"

Sony Ericsson T610 camera phone awarded "Best Phone" by the GSM Association
Full story http://www.phonecontent.com/bm/news/se/177.shtml

---

› See More: T610 awarded "Best phone"

"Bjorn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Sony Ericsson T610 camera phone awarded "Best Phone" by the GSM
Association
> Full story http://www.phonecontent.com/bm/news/se/177.shtml

Well, the GSM Association can eat my bandwidth then. I love my t610 for all
of its wonderous features, but no phone with sub-average reception should be
awarded "best phone."


---
Update your PC at http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.605 / Virus Database: 385 - Release Date: 3/1/2004

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:15:26 +0100, "Bjorn" <[email protected]> wrote some
stuff about "T610 awarded "Best phone"", to which I would like to add the
following:

>Sony Ericsson T610 camera phone awarded "Best Phone" by the GSM Association
>Full story http://www.phonecontent.com/bm/news/se/177.shtml

That's ludicrous. A phone with that shoddy screen to be best... don't think
so, and any publication saying so would just make themselves look clueless.
It would be in the top 5 somewhere for sure, but best..

Cheers,
Chanchao

"Carl." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Bjorn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Sony Ericsson T610 camera phone awarded "Best Phone" by the GSM
> Association
> > Full story http://www.phonecontent.com/bm/news/se/177.shtml
>
> Well, the GSM Association can eat my bandwidth then. I love my t610 for
all
> of its wonderous features, but no phone with sub-average reception should
be
> awarded "best phone."

I like my T610 too... and it seemed perfect until I found myself wanting
more: better screen, better camera, speakerphone, more control over sounds
and alerts, better reception, ...

I may, however, be the best out there. I'm sure no phone is perfect.

Chanchao <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:15:26 +0100, "Bjorn" <[email protected]> wrote
> some stuff about "T610 awarded "Best phone"", to which I would like to
> add the following:
>
>>Sony Ericsson T610 camera phone awarded "Best Phone" by the GSM
>>Association Full story
>>http://www.phonecontent.com/bm/news/se/177.shtml
>
> That's ludicrous. A phone with that shoddy screen to be best... don't
> think so, and any publication saying so would just make themselves
> look clueless. It would be in the top 5 somewhere for sure, but best..
>
> Cheers,
> Chanchao
>

So, what should have won, then?

--
Sol
www.beep.tk

On 2 Mar 2004 18:45:19 GMT, Sol <[email protected]> wrote some stuff about "Re:
T610 awarded "Best phone"", to which I would like to add the following:

>>>Sony Ericsson T610 camera phone awarded "Best Phone" by the GSM
>>>Association Full story
>>>http://www.phonecontent.com/bm/news/se/177.shtml
>>
>> That's ludicrous. A phone with that shoddy screen to be best... don't
>> think so, and any publication saying so would just make themselves
>> look clueless. It would be in the top 5 somewhere for sure, but best..

>So, what should have won, then?

:-) Good and very valid question. :-) I guess no phone can be everything
to everyone? I seriously like Nokia 6600 but it's not for everyone. I also
like P900 but that's REALLY not for everyone.

I think though that P800/900 was MORE revolutionary than T610. Of course it's
debatable if it's still a 'phone'. I think I'd cut the award up into a
phone-only category, which would likely be won by some Samsung clamshell job,
and then a smart-phone category for which I would choose P800 or 6600.

I actually like the P800 design a lot more than P900. P800 is stylish, P900
just geeky toyish.

Cheers,
Chanchao