A busted screen won't be fixed by Sprint

> Your statement is an absolute lie, unless you can
> provide documentation that
> Sprint PCS has NEVER honored a warranty claim
> for a busted screen.

3G geek posted it last year.

Search Result 1From: 3G Geek ([email protected])
Subject: Re: 8100 - shattered screen View:
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Date: 2003-10-11 07:31:54 PST

There have been "known issues" with phones screens breaking or bleeding
without physical abuse or the screens not being "strong enough" which
will qualify for a warranty replacement. The 8100 is not one of those
phones.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No cellular manufacturer conisders a screen a warrantable item. ~90% of
the time they only break from abuse. Sprint will not help anyone. Surely you
learned that in training.
Costco, Macy's, Foleys, etc will do something for a customer.

[posted via phonescoop.com]

---

› See More: A busted screen won't be fixed by Sprint

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> > Your statement is an absolute lie, unless you can=20
> > provide documentation that
> > Sprint PCS has NEVER honored a warranty claim=20
> > for a busted screen.
>=20
> 3G geek posted it last year.
>=20
> Search Result 1From: 3G Geek ([email protected])
> Subject: Re: 8100 - shattered screen View:=20
> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
> Date: 2003-10-11 07:31:54 PST=20
>=20
> There have been "known issues" with phones screens breaking or bleeding
> without physical abuse or the screens not being "strong enough" which
> will qualify for a warranty replacement. The 8100 is not one of those
> phones.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> No cellular manufacturer conisders a screen a warrantable item. ~90% of
> the time they only break from abuse. Sprint will not help anyone. Surely=
you
> learned that in training.
> Costco, Macy's, Foleys, etc will do something for a customer.
>=20
> [posted via phonescoop.com]

Your fabrication contradicts itself, Phillie.First it speaks of known=20
issues being covered, then it says none are. And even the one that=20
says none are *also* says "~90%" of such items are abuse.

So much for your definition of "proof."

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com> wrote:

> Your fabrication contradicts itself..First it speaks of known
> issues being covered, then it says none are. And even the one that
> says none are *also* says "~90%" of such items are abuse.
>
> So much for your definition of "proof."

Quit with the insults, name the phones or lose whatever credibility you
have left.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
> > > Your statement is an absolute lie, unless you can
> > > provide documentation that
> > > Sprint PCS has NEVER honored a warranty claim
> > > for a busted screen.
> >
> > 3G geek posted it last year.
> >
> > Search Result 1From: 3G Geek ([email protected])
> > Subject: Re: 8100 - shattered screen View:
> > Newsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
> > Date: 2003-10-11 07:31:54 PST
> >
> > There have been "known issues" with phones screens breaking or bleeding
> > without physical abuse or the screens not being "strong enough" which
> > will qualify for a warranty replacement. The 8100 is not one of those
> > phones.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > No cellular manufacturer conisders a screen a warrantable item. ~90% of
> > the time they only break from abuse. Sprint will not help anyone. Surely
> > you
> > learned that in training.
> > Costco, Macy's, Foleys, etc will do something for a customer.
> >
> > [posted via phonescoop.com]
>
> Your fabrication contradicts itself

Why are you Lying, Thats a valid find in Google.

I found that in Google too, what the problem

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> Why are you Lying, Thats a valid find in Google.
>
> I found that in Google too, what the problem

The problem? You mean other than the problem that the post says that in
some models, known issues with the screen qualify under the warranty?

Read it again real slow, and get out the See n Say for the big words.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Quit with the insults, name the phones or lose whatever credibility you=
=20
> have left.
>=20

Phillie, you have absolutely *no* authority to have any effect upon=20
my credibility. That kind of dishonesty is exactly why.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
>=20
> Why are you Lying, Thats a valid find in Google.
>=20
> I found that in Google too, what the problem
>=20

Hmm, again with the multiple ID's. Not that it wasn't already known,=20
but you're posting back and forth as both "Cell Merger" and "Robert=20
M.".

You've posted links before when you had them to give. And when you=20
make things up, you don't. Your pattern here is well established and=20
consistent.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
> >
> > Why are you Lying, Thats a valid find in Google.
> >
> > I found that in Google too, what the problem
> >

>
> You've posted links before when you had them to give. And when you
> make things up, you don't. Your pattern here is well established and
> consistent.


Liar if as has been posted there are 4 model phones that SprintPCS will
warrant, then list them.

If you won't then it is a SECRET.

You can't say its not a SECRET, and then not post the names.

Whoops, I forgot, LIAR that you are you would.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] says...
> > >
> > > Why are you Lying, Thats a valid find in Google.
> > >
> > > I found that in Google too, what the problem
> > >
>
> >
> > You've posted links before when you had them to give. And when you
> > make things up, you don't. Your pattern here is well established and
> > consistent.
>
>
> Liar if as has been posted there are 4 model phones that SprintPCS will
> warrant, then list them.
>
> If you won't then it is a SECRET.
>
> You can't say its not a SECRET, and then not post the names.
>
> Whoops, I forgot, LIAR that you are you would.

Well Phillipe, it's time ... As you continue to call us all liars, when the
only one here is you ... It's time to pay the piper. Here are 55 lies, all
documented as your IDs ...

# USENET ID EMAIL ADDRESS ISP IP
1 A.M. [email protected] EL 66.32.48.90
2 Al [email protected] EL 66.32.48.90
3 Alias for Smith [email protected] AOL
4 Bernard Sharri [email protected] AOL
5 BlueTooth Now [email protected] AOL
6 Bob Veldrends [email protected] AOL
7 Camile Cardenas [email protected] EL 66.32.50.20
8 Carl70015 [email protected] AOL
9 Carlos Z. [email protected] EL 66.32.50.172
10 CAT0NHAT [email protected] AOL
11 Chris McFarland [email protected] EL 66.32.51.239
12 David [email protected] EL 66.32.51.23
13 Dennis [email protected] EL 66.32.50.226
14 Donald [email protected] EL 66.32.48.173
15 DSL GURU [email protected] AOL
16 HK [email protected] EL 66.32.49.221
17 J. Range [email protected] EL 66.32.49.180
18 James [email protected] EL 66.32.49.147
19 James Tullin [email protected] EL 66.32.50.69
20 John S. [email protected] EL 66.32.48.252
21 Jonathan [email protected] EL 66.32.48.64
22 Joseph [email protected] EL 66.32.48.147
23 Leonard [email protected] EL 66.32.51.250
24 LosAngelessLegal [email protected] AOL
25 Loving Moonlight [email protected] AOL
26 Matthew Lindeen [email protected] EL 66.32.51.192
27 Michael [email protected] EL 66.32.49.180
28 Milton Searlis [email protected] AOL
29 Monday Cellphone [email protected] AOL
30 P. [email protected] EL 66.32.49.170
31 P. Reality [email protected] EL 66.32.48.182
32 Patrick Bosley [email protected] EL 66.32.51.103
33 PHil_Real [email protected] EL 66.32.48.182
34 Phill. [email protected] EL 66.32.49.170
35 Phillipe . [email protected] EL 66.32.48.182
36 Phillipe2004 [email protected] EL 66.32.49.170
37 Posting Editor [email protected] AOL
38 PTT ReadyLink [email protected] AOL
39 Reginald [email protected] EL 66.32.49.170
40 Renaldo [email protected] EL 66.32.50.88
41 Richard [email protected] EL 66.32.48.182
42 Robert M. [email protected] EL 66.32.49.155
43 Ronald [email protected] EL 66.32.49.170
44 Sanyo Guy [email protected] EL 66.32.51.103
45 Sarah Morlan [email protected] AOL
46 Sergei Kosonov [email protected] EL 66.32.48.84
47 Sprint Truth [email protected] AOL
48 Sprintinator [email protected] EL 66.32.49.170
49 Sprintposter [email protected] AOL
50 Stewart [email protected] EL 66.32.51.248
51 Sunday Auto [email protected] AOL
52 Thomas Aspland [email protected] AOL
53 Tim Harrick [email protected] EL 66.32.50.34
54 weekend Sunshine [email protected] AOL
55 William Bays [email protected] AOL

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
>
> Liar if as has been posted there are 4 model phones that SprintPCS will
> warrant, then list them.

And only you, the originator of lies, mistruths and bad advice, would make a
statement that everything posted here is true, and not subject to
verification.

>
> If you won't then it is a SECRET.

Its not a secret if it is common knowledge among a group of people.
Besides, Sprint (or any other company) owes you absolutely no obligation to
divulge any information that has no bearing on the current state of your
account with them. Your little fishing expeditions don't qualify, and your
really bad suppositions don't either.

>
> You can't say its not a SECRET, and then not post the names.

Sure he can- he knows how many people work at his call center, but doesn't
post it here. That doesn't make it a secret.

>
> Whoops, I forgot, LIAR that you are you would.

No- troll that you are you would twist and misquote it to suit your own
juvenile purposes.

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> Well Phillipe, it's time ... As you continue to call us all liars, when
the
> only one here is you ... It's time to pay the piper. Here are 55 lies, all
> documented as your IDs ...
>


Can I suggest his next one? How about "Sprint PCS Village Idiot"?

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Liar if as has been posted there are 4 model phones that SprintPCS will=
=20
> warrant, then list them.
>=20
> If you won't then it is a SECRET.
>=20
> You can't say its not a SECRET, and then not post the names.
>=20

I noticed you avoided the real point.

What *I* say or don't say has nothing to do with whether SPCS will or=20
won't say it.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
> > Liar if as has been posted there are 4 model phones that SprintPCS will
> > warrant, then list them.
> >
> > If you won't then it is a SECRET.
> >
> > You can't say its not a SECRET, and then not post the names.
> >
>
> I noticed you avoided the real point.
>
> What *I* say or don't say has nothing to do with whether SPCS will or
> won't say it.


The real point is SprintPCS lousy customer service with respect to bad
screens. Tech Geek says there are 4 models of phoines with an admitted
problem that Sprint will replace. I noticed you still say nothing,
confirming it still is a customer unfriendly secret; just like the
SECRET recall of the Samsung 8500 phones

In article <rmarkoff-3B461A.06150622032004
@news1.west.earthlink.net>, Robert [email protected]=20
says...
> The real point is SprintPCS lousy customer service with respect to bad=20
> screens.
>=20

A point you've yet to prove in the least, Phill. Your=20
invented paranoia about "secret recalls" and "hidden=20
warranties" does not make those silly claims true.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <rmarkoff-3B461A.06150622032004
> @news1.west.earthlink.net>, Robert [email protected]
> says...
> > The real point is SprintPCS lousy customer service with respect to bad
> > screens.
> >
>
> A point you've yet to prove in the least

You proved it for me already. You won't post the names of the 4 Sp[rint
model phones that a store MAY replace a defective screen on.