Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Mij Adyaw
    Guest
    The new Yahoo mail application looks to be really good. The downside is that
    it is subscription based and costs $3.00 per month. I wish that the
    applications would go to a simple sales model in which the user could
    purchase the program for a one-time price. I have never purchased an
    application and probably never will because I am quite put-off by the
    subscription based model. I believe in purchasing software for a one-time
    price. Sprint Marketing, are you listening?

    -mij





    See More: Applicatioins




  2. #2
    Steve Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Applicatioins

    Mij Adyaw wrote:
    > The new Yahoo mail application looks to be really good. The downside is that
    > it is subscription based and costs $3.00 per month. I wish that the
    > applications would go to a simple sales model in which the user could
    > purchase the program for a one-time price.


    Email can be considered a service, and monthly subscription models make
    sense for services. For games and other such apps, I'd agree that one-time
    fees are probably more appropriate.

    >I have never purchased an
    > application and probably never will because I am quite put-off by the
    > subscription based model. I believe in purchasing software for a one-time
    > price. Sprint Marketing, are you listening?


    I believe the software publisher is also involved in product pricing. But I
    could be wrong about that.


    --
    JustThe.net - Steve Sobol / [email protected] / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
    Coming to you from Southern California's High Desert, where the
    temperatures are as high as the gas prices! / 888.480.4NET (4638)

    "Life's like an hourglass glued to the table" --Anna Nalick, "Breathe"



  3. #3
    Mij Adyaw
    Guest

    Re: Applicatioins

    Steve,

    The mail application is being advertised by Yahoo. I have been a paying
    Yahoo customer for several years and therefore expect either free access to
    a software application that accesses email, or a "one-time" price to
    purchase the application. It seems that Yahoo is jumping on the bandwagon
    and following the sales model of the cell phone service providers. I will
    just stick with free access to my yahoo email by browsing the yahoo mobile
    webpage. I am in the software development business and cannot get used to
    this idea of a "monthly fee". It just goes against the grain for me. Call me
    old fashion but I just cannot get over it! My company offers annual support
    contracts, but all software has a one-time price to purchase a license.

    -mij



    "Steve Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Mij Adyaw wrote:
    >> The new Yahoo mail application looks to be really good. The downside is
    >> that it is subscription based and costs $3.00 per month. I wish that the
    >> applications would go to a simple sales model in which the user could
    >> purchase the program for a one-time price.

    >
    > Email can be considered a service, and monthly subscription models make
    > sense for services. For games and other such apps, I'd agree that one-time
    > fees are probably more appropriate.
    >
    >>I have never purchased an application and probably never will because I am
    >>quite put-off by the subscription based model. I believe in purchasing
    >>software for a one-time price. Sprint Marketing, are you listening?

    >
    > I believe the software publisher is also involved in product pricing. But
    > I could be wrong about that.
    >
    >
    > --
    > JustThe.net - Steve Sobol / [email protected] / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
    > Coming to you from Southern California's High Desert, where the
    > temperatures are as high as the gas prices! / 888.480.4NET (4638)
    >
    > "Life's like an hourglass glued to the table" --Anna Nalick, "Breathe"






  4. #4

    Re: Applicatioins

    I agree with Mij. It should have a one time price of say $20 or
    something. The $3/mo. fee sucks and is overpriced.




  5. #5
    Joseph Huber
    Guest

    Re: Applicatioins

    "Mij Adyaw" <[email protected]> wrote:
    > I wish that the
    >applications would go to a simple sales model in which the user could
    >purchase the program for a one-time price. I have never purchased an
    >application and probably never will because I am quite put-off by the
    >subscription based model. I believe in purchasing software for a one-time
    >price. Sprint Marketing, are you listening?


    Mij, I'm with you on this one. I hate that model as well, and I'm not
    downloading anything thing that is subscription based (not that I've
    found anything useful to download...)

    I doubt if Sprint Marketing is listening. But if enough folks boycott
    Sprint's apps and ringers that are marketed under the subscription
    mode, they might notice that...

    Joe Huber
    [email protected]



  6. #6
    Steve Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Applicatioins

    Mij Adyaw wrote:

    > The mail application is being advertised by Yahoo. I have been a paying
    > Yahoo customer for several years and therefore expect either free access to
    > a software application that accesses email, or a "one-time" price to
    > purchase the application.


    That's reasonable. I'm just saying that for certain types of applications,
    the pricing model does make sense.

    > this idea of a "monthly fee". It just goes against the grain for me. Call me
    > old fashion but I just cannot get over it! My company offers annual support
    > contracts, but all software has a one-time price to purchase a license.


    But there are other companies that do offer software on a subscription
    basis. It's not all that uncommon.

    --
    JustThe.net - Steve Sobol / [email protected] / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
    Coming to you from Southern California's High Desert, where the
    temperatures are as high as the gas prices! / 888.480.4NET (4638)

    "Life's like an hourglass glued to the table" --Anna Nalick, "Breathe"



  7. #7
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Applicatioins


    <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > I agree with Mij. It should have a one time price of say $20 or
    > something. The $3/mo. fee sucks and is overpriced.


    And how is SPCS going to provide a credit, if the customer decides to cancel
    that service after a month or two? You'd be pissed if you didn't get some
    kind of prorated credit to cancel that service after a couple of months of
    use.

    Bob





  8. #8
    Tinman
    Guest

    Re: Applicatioins

    Bob Smith wrote:
    > <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> I agree with Mij. It should have a one time price of say $20 or
    >> something. The $3/mo. fee sucks and is overpriced.

    >
    > And how is SPCS going to provide a credit, if the customer decides to
    > cancel that service after a month or two? You'd be pissed if you
    > didn't get some kind of prorated credit to cancel that service after
    > a couple of months of use.


    When you buy an application do you usually receive a "credit" several
    weeks or months after you've purchased it? Generally, no. Same thing
    here.

    Now SPCS could offer both models: purchase it for X number of dollars or
    subscribe to it for Y number of dollars per month.

    I know I'm not going for the subscription model--certainly not at the
    prices SPCS seems to want to charge (or their software suppliers). I did
    buy a few games a few years ago, but they were not time-limited in any
    way. That's about the only way I'd buy anything (and to be fair, there
    are still MANY non-time-limited apps and games from SPCS).


    --
    Mike