Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22
  1. #16
    Jack Zwick
    Guest

    Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Tropical Haven <[email protected]> wrote:

    > >>>Teams of Cingular employees spent Sunday night fully converting 1,055
    > >>>former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores into Cingular stores.
    > >>
    > >>You said it yourself -- "1,055 former AT&T Wireless company-owned
    > >>stores", it DID NOT say ALL former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores.

    > >
    > >
    > > Read it. The ones not done were "agent locations", not company stores.
    > > Jeeez

    >
    > That's still not what it said. It basically said agent stores were
    > going to be switching over in the foreseeable future. It still didn't
    > mentional ALL ATTWS corporate stores.


    Yes it did, and you know it otherwise you wouldn't have snipped out the
    link.

    <http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/mi...8644&TICK=CING
    UL1&STORY=/www/story/11-16-2004/0002458939&EDATE=Nov+16,+2004>



    See More: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?




  2. #17
    John S.
    Guest

    Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?

    >http://www.expressnewsline.com/0805/...bc+buying+tele
    com-status-19-newsID-20.html

    This was a very poorly and un-informed story but the rest were intersting.

    I had not seen any of them. Considering that the USA Today story was market Jan
    28th, I just missed it as I came home for the weekend.

    But thank you for showing them to me!

    --
    John S.
    e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net



  3. #18
    Jack Zwick
    Guest

    Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected]pamfree (John S.) wrote:

    > >http://www.expressnewsline.com/0805/...bc+buying+tele

    > com-status-19-newsID-20.html
    >
    > This was a very poorly and un-informed story but the rest were intersting.
    >
    > I had not seen any of them. Considering that the USA Today story was market
    > Jan
    > 28th, I just missed it as I came home for the weekend.
    >
    > But thank you for showing them to me!
    >
    > --
    > John S.
    > e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net


    <http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor.../bs_usatoday/s
    bcatamptdiscussmerger>

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=4470328

    http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=122778

    <http://www.expressnewsline.com/0805/...sbc+buying+tel
    ecom-status-19-newsID-20.html>

    http://www.suntimes.com/output/busin...fin-sbc28.html

    <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...1/28/MNGGNB222
    51.DTL>

    <http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor.../telecoms_att_
    dc_17>

    <http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...lt_afp/uscompa
    nytelecomatt_050127221811>

    <http://www.fool.com/News/mft/2005/mf...ptyholnk303100
    &logvisit=y&npu=y>

    Make sure you snip out the other links so it looks like only missed one
    story. The story was all over the 27 and the 28th.



  4. #19
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Sat, 29 Jan
    2005 20:19:10 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    > Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:15:14 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >> >In article <[email protected]>,
    >> > "JohnF" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >
    >> >> Jack, you need to get over this obsession you have with their signs. I'm
    >> >> glad they're worrying about things that matter. Maybe they're still
    >> >> deciding
    >> >> which stores to keep and don't want to sink money in changing signs that
    >> >> they're going to close? Who cares?
    >> >
    >> >Did you ever read the press release?
    >> >
    >> ><http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/mi...8644&TICK=CING
    >> >UL1&STORY=/www/story/11-16-2004/0002458939&EDATE=Nov+16,+2004>
    >> >
    >> >Teams of Cingular employees spent Sunday night fully converting 1,055
    >> >former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores into Cingular stores.

    >>
    >> You seem to be the only one who is really concerned about *signs!*
    >> Give it up already! Sheesh!

    >
    >The signs are just a symbol of Cingular's lying. ...


    Total nonsense.

    --
    Best regards,
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>

    "A little learning is a dangerous thing." [Alexander Pope]
    "It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
    than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." [Mark Twain]



  5. #20
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Sun, 30 Jan
    2005 01:47:46 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    > Tropical Haven <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> >>>Teams of Cingular employees spent Sunday night fully converting 1,055
    >> >>>former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores into Cingular stores.
    >> >>
    >> >>You said it yourself -- "1,055 former AT&T Wireless company-owned
    >> >>stores", it DID NOT say ALL former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores.
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > Read it. The ones not done were "agent locations", not company stores.
    >> > Jeeez

    >>
    >> That's still not what it said. It basically said agent stores were
    >> going to be switching over in the foreseeable future. It still didn't
    >> mentional ALL ATTWS corporate stores.

    >
    >Yes it did,


    No it didn't.

    >and you know it otherwise you wouldn't have snipped out the
    >link.
    >
    ><http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/mi...8644&TICK=CING
    >UL1&STORY=/www/story/11-16-2004/0002458939&EDATE=Nov+16,+2004>


    Doesn't say what you claim, as has been pointed out to you repeatedly.

    --
    Best regards,
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>

    "A little learning is a dangerous thing." [Alexander Pope]
    "It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
    than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." [Mark Twain]



  6. #21
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Sun, 30 Jan
    2005 01:46:42 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    > Tropical Haven <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> Sorry you can't take 30 seconds to Tiny URL it.
    >>
    >> Apparently you need to expand beyond long URL posting.
    >>
    >> http://tinyurl.com/

    >
    >Apparently you need to learn manners.
    >
    >Many folks refuse to use a tiny url link as they don't know where it may
    >lead them, so in deference to that legitimate concern I don't use it.


    What a silly excuse. Regardless, you should at least learn how to post them
    without wrapping them. LOL

    --
    Best regards,
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>

    "A little learning is a dangerous thing." [Alexander Pope]
    "It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
    than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." [Mark Twain]



  7. #22
    Kevin K
    Guest

    Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?

    On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:15:14 +0000, Jack Zwick wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "JohnF" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> Jack, you need to get over this obsession you have with their signs. I'm
    >> glad they're worrying about things that matter. Maybe they're still
    >> deciding which stores to keep and don't want to sink money in changing
    >> signs that they're going to close? Who cares?

    >
    > Did you ever read the press release?
    >
    > <http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/mi...8644&TICK=CING
    > UL1&STORY=/www/story/11-16-2004/0002458939&EDATE=Nov+16,+2004>
    >
    > Teams of Cingular employees spent Sunday night fully converting 1,055
    > former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores into Cingular stores.


    Which, to a reasonable person, would mean that they now have Cingular
    phones and displays, remove AT&T literature, etc.

    A local Eckerd drug store converted to CVS before November 15th. They
    still have a plastic CVS sign partially covering the old Eckerd sign.



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12