Adios, Cingular!

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>>
>>There is damage- financial damage. ...
>
> In what way? How much?
>
> --

Too bad you clipped the post- it explains your confusion. You can't figure
it out. I thought you were supposed to be all-knowing. After all, that's
the way you post.

C'mon, John- its very obvious.

---

› See More: Adios, Cingular!

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> No matter what you might wish, it's actually just the opposite -- numbers
> (e.g., lower churn) show that Cingular is doing a surprisingly good job of
> retaining ATTWS customers.

Going from high to lower only means that they are not as bad. The number
reported does not mean they are good. Don't believe it? Compare it to the
competition.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Fri, 17 Feb 2006
19:40:37 -0700, "Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>
>>>
>>>There is damage- financial damage. ...
>>
>> In what way? How much?
>>
>> --
>
>Too bad you clipped the post- it explains your confusion. You can't figure
>it out. I thought you were supposed to be all-knowing. After all, that's
>the way you post.
>
>C'mon, John- its very obvious.

I didn't think so. Thanks for the confirmation.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>>
>>C'mon, John- its very obvious.
>
> I didn't think ...

That's frequently your problem.