Random opinions of SprintPCS

In article <[email protected]>,
"Thomas M. Goethe" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > "Thomas M. Goethe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The deal here is that we have three mediocre GSM carriers trying to
> > > compete with one strong CDMA carrier.
> >
> > And what is Sprint PCS? Chopped liver?
>
> Yes.


cross posted for benefit of Smith, Veldhouse etc.

---

› See More: Random opinions of SprintPCS

Robert M. <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > compete with one strong CDMA carrier.
>> >
>> > And what is Sprint PCS? Chopped liver?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> cross posted for benefit of Smith, Veldhouse etc.

Even *you* tell us you like the network a lot, Doofus. They're in ~300
markets, they have great coverage in most of those markets...

--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, Apple Valley, CA
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
PGP: C57E 8B25 F994 D6D0 5F6B B961 EA08 9410 E3AE 35ED

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Thomas M. Goethe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > In article <[email protected]>,
> > > "Thomas M. Goethe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The deal here is that we have three mediocre GSM carriers trying
to
> > > > compete with one strong CDMA carrier.
> > >
> > > And what is Sprint PCS? Chopped liver?
> >
> > Yes.
>
>
> cross posted for benefit of Smith, Veldhouse etc.

Be still my heart ... So, Phillipe, which news group did you cross post this
from? As to who ever called SPCS chopped liver, obviously they aren't aware
of the expanded coverage of SPCS or the options they are offering. SPCS has
better market penetration than most of the other coverages.

So, Phillipe, as Steven asked, did you defend SPCS's coverage in that other
newsgroup?

Bob

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Thomas M. Goethe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > In article <[email protected]>,
> > > "Thomas M. Goethe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The deal here is that we have three mediocre GSM carriers trying
to
> > > > compete with one strong CDMA carrier.
> > >
> > > And what is Sprint PCS? Chopped liver?
> >
> > Yes.
>
>
> cross posted for benefit of Smith, Veldhouse etc.

Cool- I guess you just opened the door for me to cross post some of the
moronic crap you've been spouting elsewhere, including the thread your
little clip came from. It makes for great reading.

Bob Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > The deal here is that we have three mediocre GSM carriers trying
> to
>> > > > compete with one strong CDMA carrier.
>> > >
>> > > And what is Sprint PCS? Chopped liver?
>> >
>> > Yes.
>>
>>
>> cross posted for benefit of Smith, Veldhouse etc.
>
> Be still my heart ... So, Phillipe, which news group did you cross post this
> from? As to who ever called SPCS chopped liver, obviously they aren't aware
> of the expanded coverage of SPCS or the options they are offering. SPCS has
> better market penetration than most of the other coverages.

It was in alt.cellular, in a discussion about the possible Cingular purchase
of ATTWS, and the comment is that currently we have three mediocre GSM
carriers - ATT, Cingular and T-Mobile - trying to compete with one strong
CDMA carrier. Obviously, you know the CDMA carrier referred to was Verizon
because Phillipe can't say anything nice about Sprint.

--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, Apple Valley, CA
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
PGP: C57E 8B25 F994 D6D0 5F6B B961 EA08 9410 E3AE 35ED

Steven J Sobol wrote:


> It was in alt.cellular, in a discussion about the possible Cingular purchase
> of ATTWS, and the comment is that currently we have three mediocre GSM
> carriers - ATT, Cingular and T-Mobile - trying to compete with one strong
> CDMA carrier. Obviously, you know the CDMA carrier referred to was Verizon
> because Phillipe can't say anything nice about Sprint.

Yes, and yet he won't GO to Verizon. I guess it's because just like his
stint with AT&T, he knows he's going to find something terribly
unacceptable with Verizon and then he'll hear it from all of us when he
starts trolling in alt.cellular.verizon



--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

Thomas T. Veldhouse <[email protected]> wrote:

> It is either embarrassment that keeps him from going to Verizon ... or
> he actually likes Sprint PCS better ... I don't know which it is, but I
> suspect that Phillip won't be enlightening us anytime soon.

In all fairness to Phillipe, he has repeatedly stated that he is happy
with Sprint's network and the technical aspects of the service. What he
continually whines about is company policies and customer service.

--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, Apple Valley, CA
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
PGP: C57E 8B25 F994 D6D0 5F6B B961 EA08 9410 E3AE 35ED

Thomas T. Veldhouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> Steven J Sobol <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> In all fairness to Phillipe, he has repeatedly stated that he is happy
>> with Sprint's network and the technical aspects of the service. What he
>> continually whines about is company policies and customer service.
>>
>
> If that were true, why did he go with AT&T? I think whatever drove him
> to AT&T would also drive him to Verizon now?

Customer service, again, is what he whines about.

--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, Apple Valley, CA
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
PGP: C57E 8B25 F994 D6D0 5F6B B961 EA08 9410 E3AE 35ED

Steven J Sobol wrote:
> Thomas T. Veldhouse <[email protected]> wrote:

> In all fairness to Phillipe, he has repeatedly stated that he is happy
> with Sprint's network and the technical aspects of the service.

I disagree. He's whined constantly about the delayed MO-SMS rollout,
and decries Sprint's lack of Bluetooth offerings. Not somebody who I'd
say is happy with the technical aspects of the services, with the amount
of *****ing he does on those two topics alone.

But then, maybe he's happy with *everything*, and just needs attention
and feels the only way he can get it is to whine about how crappy his
service is. But I'm only speculating. Only Phillipe can know what's
going on in that addled little mind of his.

--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.