Tech Geek STOP Feeding the TROLL

If you stop replying to the TROLL, we might finally be able to get rid of
him.

Chris

---

› See More: Tech Geek STOP Feeding the TROLL

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 16:42:44 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.75.15.212
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: twister.socal.rr.com 1083775364 66.75.15.212 (Wed, 05 May 2004 09:42:44 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 09:42:44 PDT
Organization: RoadRunner - West
Xref: news.newshosting.com alt.cellular.sprintpcs:141287

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
>
> Lawrence Glasser <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > The troll's not an idot, he's a troll.
> >
> > He's *not* gonna go away 'cause we ignore him. He's a troll.
> >
> > By stopping the responses to him, only one thing will be
> > accomlished, and that's the amount of crap posted in this
> > newsgroup in response to him and as challenges to him.
> >
>
> Are you suggesting the "amount of crap" will go up or down?

For every "crap posting" of his, there are x number of responses.

While his crap might not stop, by cutting down on the sheer
number of responses, the board will be thinned, significantly.

(Mind you, some of his posts are well though out and constructive.
Personally, I don't mind those. It's the name-calling, immature,
"Sprint-always-sucks" posts that I'm tired of.)

Larry

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 41
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 17:00:13 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.75.15.212
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: twister.socal.rr.com 1083776413 66.75.15.212 (Wed, 05 May 2004 10:00:13 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 10:00:13 PDT
Organization: RoadRunner - West
Xref: news.newshosting.com alt.cellular.sprintpcs:141292

Bob Smith wrote:
>
> "Lawrence Glasser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Jim Catero wrote:
> > >
> > > Well during the last year has anyone ever tried to stop him ?.
> > > NO, the push here is to stop responding, this has not been done to any
> > > effect because too many people give up or don't go along to start with.
> > > I have seen this work , but as long there are folks who don't have the
> > > self discipline to ignore the fool he'll stay.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > The troll's not an idot, he's a troll.
> >
> > He's *not* gonna go away 'cause we ignore him. He's a troll.
> >
> > By stopping the responses to him, only one thing will be
> > accomlished, and that's the amount of crap posted in this
> > newsgroup in response to him and as challenges to him.
> >
> > Is that what we all want?
> >
> > Larry
>
> No matter what anyone does, he ain't going away. The only thing we can do is
> not reply to his Robert M. posts, call him out when he shows another ID
> which isn't caught by the filters, and to reply directly to posters, when he
> gives out poor advice, and provide the correct advice.
>
> At least with that approach, the arguments will settle down. Let the coward
> play with himself, as he does anyway.

I've gotta disagree with you, in part.

If you "call him out when he shows another ID," the problem is perpetuated.

Just ignore him.

Larry

"Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> If you stop replying to the TROLL, we might finally be able to get rid of
> him.
>
> Chris

Don't worry, I'm not going to get into a back-and-fourth posting match with him.

He twisted the new plan around, I corrected him. Now I'm done.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you stop replying to the TROLL, we might finally be able to get rid of
> him.
>
> Chris
>

FYI ... the troll will respond to you for posting this message, so he
knows who he is already. Further, if he hasn't left in almost one year,
why do you think he will leave now?

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAmO911p0e3NXsrtERAgHJAJ9pYBUFOqPTaWYl2hE3CpkPhg2R7wCgn2B1
2OuZi+7Tt07K+068ZL1+VLQ=
=unLl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

TechGeek wrote:
> "Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
>
>>If you stop replying to the TROLL, we might finally be able to get rid of
>>him.
>>
>>Chris
>
>
> Don't worry, I'm not going to get into a back-and-fourth posting match with him.
>
> He twisted the new plan around, I corrected him. Now I'm done.

Good, But now look, he posted another damn faq.
If you must respond to his B.S. try to do it w/o directly responding.
A. This cuts him out somewhat and B. if he responds with his usual crap
it allows new folks to see what a turd he is.
I would respond to him by just cutting out his id , you can keep the
original header that way.


Jim

Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chris Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>If you stop replying to the TROLL, we might finally be able to get rid of
>>him.
>>
>>Chris
>>
>
>
> FYI ... the troll will respond to you for posting this message, so he
> knows who he is already. Further, if he hasn't left in almost one year,
> why do you think he will leave now?


Well during the last year has anyone ever tried to stop him ?.
NO, the push here is to stop responding, this has not been done to any
effect because too many people give up or don't go along to start with.
I have seen this work , but as long there are folks who don't have the
self discipline to ignore the fool he'll stay.

Jim

Jim Catero [email protected] /aka Michael Arends posted:

> Good, But now look, he posted another faq.

Hasnt he said your insults will be counterproductive?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jim Catero <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Well during the last year has anyone ever tried to stop him ?.
> NO, the push here is to stop responding, this has not been done to any
> effect because too many people give up or don't go along to start with.
> I have seen this work , but as long there are folks who don't have the
> self discipline to ignore the fool he'll stay.
>
> Jim
>

The last attempt to do this is what caused him to start changing IDs in
the hope that people did not know it was him to which they were
responding. This at some point also spawned Richard, whom Phillip was
then having a conversation with to support his own argument and keep his
ego intact. He was busted and now the 70+ ids are a part of his
promiscuous history.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAmQmM1p0e3NXsrtERAsukAKC4r0GN7PfBJYiD6miLL5w9FdONLwCgsrD0
7r9SU4YrQ7O0NjA6bLzRk6Q=
=Px0l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Jim Catero wrote:
>
> Well during the last year has anyone ever tried to stop him ?.
> NO, the push here is to stop responding, this has not been done to any
> effect because too many people give up or don't go along to start with.
> I have seen this work , but as long there are folks who don't have the
> self discipline to ignore the fool he'll stay.

Agreed.

The troll's not an idot, he's a troll.

He's *not* gonna go away 'cause we ignore him. He's a troll.

By stopping the responses to him, only one thing will be
accomlished, and that's the amount of crap posted in this
newsgroup in response to him and as challenges to him.

Is that what we all want?

Larry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Lawrence Glasser <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Agreed.
>
> The troll's not an idot, he's a troll.
>
> He's *not* gonna go away 'cause we ignore him. He's a troll.
>
> By stopping the responses to him, only one thing will be
> accomlished, and that's the amount of crap posted in this
> newsgroup in response to him and as challenges to him.
>

Are you suggesting the "amount of crap" will go up or down?

> Is that what we all want?
>
> Larry

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAmRT/1p0e3NXsrtERAhplAJ9C5CAG4E2WJzTGbvhOfNpinuCJKACcCV0K
9IPTFgvDKT8T3n42+q46wpQ=
=Y0Da
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Nebby0007" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Jim Catero [email protected] /aka Michael Arends posted:
>
> > Good, But now look, he posted another faq.
>
> Hasnt he said your insults will be counterproductive?

Stop acting in the 3rd party here Phillipe. Are such a coward, that you
can't to one ID?

Bob

[email protected] sys:

> such a coward

Another insult? haven't they been counter productive?

And what is your association with Sprint that you falsely label anyone who says
something you dont like as a Troll?

"Lawrence Glasser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Jim Catero wrote:
> >
> > Well during the last year has anyone ever tried to stop him ?.
> > NO, the push here is to stop responding, this has not been done to any
> > effect because too many people give up or don't go along to start with.
> > I have seen this work , but as long there are folks who don't have the
> > self discipline to ignore the fool he'll stay.
>
> Agreed.
>
> The troll's not an idot, he's a troll.
>
> He's *not* gonna go away 'cause we ignore him. He's a troll.
>
> By stopping the responses to him, only one thing will be
> accomlished, and that's the amount of crap posted in this
> newsgroup in response to him and as challenges to him.
>
> Is that what we all want?
>
> Larry

No matter what anyone does, he ain't going away. The only thing we can do is
not reply to his Robert M. posts, call him out when he shows another ID
which isn't caught by the filters, and to reply directly to posters, when he
gives out poor advice, and provide the correct advice.

At least with that approach, the arguments will settle down. Let the coward
play with himself, as he does anyway.

Bob

"Nebby0007" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] sys:
>
> > such a coward
>
> Another insult? haven't they been counter productive?
>
> And what is your association with Sprint that you falsely label anyone who
says
> something you dont like as a Troll?

No, I call you a coward, and a troll, as you can't stay with one ID ...

Bob