Results 1 to 6 of 6
- 05-19-2004, 05:21 PM #1Guest
Monday, March 24....
http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/showt...threadid=29938
--
John Bartley K7AAY http://celdata.cjb.net
This post quad-ROT-13 encrypted; reading it violates the DMCA.
"We're not living in a simulation. We're living in a collaborative SF novel... and now, of course, it's Philip K. Dick's turn. In a back room somewhere, Vernor Vinge and George Orwell are currently arguing about who gets to take over in 2025." (Ross Smit
h)
› See More: Number portability for the rest of the US
- 05-19-2004, 05:23 PM #2Steven J SobolGuest
Re: Number portability for the rest of the US
In alt.cellular [email protected] wrote:
> Monday, March 24....
ITYM May 24
--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, Apple Valley, CA PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
Domain Names, $9.95/yr, 24x7 service: http://DomainNames.JustThe.net/
"someone once called me a sofa, but i didn't feel compelled to rush out and buy
slip covers." -adam brower * Hiroshima '45, Chernobyl '86, Windows 98/2000/2003
- 05-19-2004, 05:44 PM #3Røbert MGuest
Re: Number portability for the rest of the US
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] wrote:
> Monday, March 24....
>
> http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/showt...threadid=29938
Could hurt Sprint PCS, already a WLNP loser from what started in
November.
- 05-19-2004, 07:27 PM #4O/SirisGuest
Re: Number portability for the rest of the US
In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Could hurt Sprint PCS, already a WLNP loser from what started in=20
> November.
>=20
Something you still haven't proven, Phill, nor have you even=20
attempted to do so.
And no, quarter-over-quarter numbers are *not* considered relevant by=20
real expert in the industry.
The ones looking at this objectively (most everyone *but* you) know=20
it's too early to come to a conclusion.
--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them
- 05-19-2004, 10:52 PM #5Bob SmithGuest
Re: Number portability for the rest of the US
"Røbert M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Monday, March 24....
> >
> > http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/showt...threadid=29938
>
> Could hurt Sprint PCS, already a WLNP loser from what started in
> November.
So Phillipe, you've spouted this a few times ... Where's the proof
previously asked for, by yours truly and others ...?
By the by, should we reiterate your history on the SPCS newsgroup?
Bob
- 05-20-2004, 10:42 AM #6Guest
Re: Number portability for the rest of the US
On Wed, 19 May 2004 18:23:42 -0500, Steven J Sobol <[email protected]>
wrote:
>In alt.cellular [email protected] wrote:
>> Monday, March 24....
>
>ITYM May 24
Brain Damage.
--
John Bartley K7AAY http://celdata.cjb.net
This post quad-ROT-13 encrypted; reading it violates the DMCA.
Nobody but a fool goes into a federal counterrorism operation without duct tape - Richard Preston, THE COBRA EVENT.
Similar Threads
- Audiovox
- Kyocera
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
Selling Himalayan Pink Salt Tiles and Bricks
in For Sale/Wanted