Results 46 to 52 of 52
- 08-14-2003, 08:40 AM #46Nomen NescioGuest
Re: Executive Services now Blocked
>If you want to talk about what SHOULD be, Sprint executives should be
>randomly given one customer's email inquiry every day and be forced to call
>customer service until somebody gives them the right answer (even if the
>executive already knows it).
Okay, okay ... we finally agree on something.
This would be a great idea. Now, if only they would actually do it.
› See More: Executive Services now Blocked
- 08-14-2003, 02:45 PM #47Bob SmithGuest
Re: Executive Services now Blocked
"Nomen Nescio" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> <sigh> With every reply like this Nomen, you lose more and more
credibility
> here ...
>
> Oh, cut the Martyr crap, Bob.
>
> When you start a post with "Not at all foul mouthed one ...", then unlike
Sprint, I am going to
> fulfull your expecations.
Oh right ... who starting cussing in the prior post to that ... You did. I
haven't sunk to your extremely low level in that reply or any other for that
matter. I just posted reflecting your posting style ... which is very foul.
>
> Ad-honimens don't work on me, because I care neither about credibility, or
making freinds, or
> even being right all the time. I just want Sprint to do the right thing.
I'll discuss my
> interpretations of the law based on experience and precidents.
>
> If you wnat to fling feces at each other like a pair of rhesus monkeys,
well, I can do that to.
> Everyone blows off steam differently.
Since when was I fling feces at you? By saying you are foul mouthed? Well,
it's true isn't it? You've shown that in quite a few prior posts here.
>
> Don't want the attacks, don't initiate them. The person you attack may be
better at it than you
> are.
What attacks? For calling you foul mouthed?
>
>
> >Only losers need to revert to swearing to try to prove their
> >position ...
>
> "Losers", eh Bob?
>
> I know people that make $500,000+ per year who curse like ****ing sailors.
In public, in a newsgroup? Sorry, but in usenet, one only has to add
colorful phrases when they have nothing else to argue about ...
>
> Losers have to pompously declare other people as losers because they
disagree with their
> demeanor.
>
> I think Losers constant support a company in the face of the indefensible,
but that is the great
> thing about freedom ... everyone has their differnt definitions.
>
> So, being the loser that I am, I might as well not fight the urge to ask
you to suck ****
> through a straw.
There you go again ...
>
>
> >What's more, you've tried to combine my comments from two
> >different posts I've made which don't apply to each other.
>
> I don't think so. I think you obviously contradicted yourself. But
interpret it as you like.
Everyone knows you did. You were trying to read between the lines and
through your deluded and muddled brain , you came up with that incorrect
premise. Did you see anyone backing your side of the discussion?
>
> Asshole.
>
>
> Love and kisses,
> The un-credible Loser
On that we can agree ... totally.
Bob
- 09-08-2003, 03:54 PM #48Carl.Guest
Re: Executive Services now Blocked
"Nomen Nescio" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> >Well said and exactly the point I was making initially Carl.
>
> Translation: "I'm on my knees Carl, now unzip your fly. Trust me, i'm
good at this."
And with that you have completed the transition from debate participant to
general usenet nerd. Goodbye.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.509 / Virus Database: 306 - Release Date: 8/12/2003
- 09-08-2003, 03:54 PM #49Nomen NescioGuest
Re: Executive Services now Blocked
<sigh> With every reply like this Nomen, you lose more and more credibility
here ...
Oh, cut the Martyr crap, Bob.
When you start a post with "Not at all foul mouthed one ...", then unlike Sprint, I am going to
fulfull your expecations.
Ad-honimens don't work on me, because I care neither about credibility, or making freinds, or
even being right all the time. I just want Sprint to do the right thing. I'll discuss my
interpretations of the law based on experience and precidents.
If you wnat to fling feces at each other like a pair of rhesus monkeys, well, I can do that to.
Everyone blows off steam differently.
Don't want the attacks, don't initiate them. The person you attack may be better at it than you
are.
>Only losers need to revert to swearing to try to prove their
>position ...
"Losers", eh Bob?
I know people that make $500,000+ per year who curse like ****ing sailors.
Losers have to pompously declare other people as losers because they disagree with their
demeanor.
I think Losers constant support a company in the face of the indefensible, but that is the great
thing about freedom ... everyone has their differnt definitions.
So, being the loser that I am, I might as well not fight the urge to ask you to suck ****
through a straw.
>What's more, you've tried to combine my comments from two
>different posts I've made which don't apply to each other.
I don't think so. I think you obviously contradicted yourself. But interpret it as you like.
Asshole.
Love and kisses,
The un-credible Loser
- 09-08-2003, 04:01 PM #50Nomen NescioGuest
Re: Executive Services now Blocked
>If you want to talk about what SHOULD be, Sprint executives should be
>randomly given one customer's email inquiry every day and be forced to call
>customer service until somebody gives them the right answer (even if the
>executive already knows it).
Okay, okay ... we finally agree on something.
This would be a great idea. Now, if only they would actually do it.
- 09-08-2003, 04:01 PM #51Nomen NescioGuest
Re: Executive Services now Blocked
>And with that you have completed the transition from debate participant to
>general usenet nerd. Goodbye.
You going somewhere, Carl?
Well, enjoy your vacation.
- 09-08-2003, 04:29 PM #52Bob SmithGuest
Re: Executive Services now Blocked
"Nomen Nescio" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> <sigh> With every reply like this Nomen, you lose more and more
credibility
> here ...
>
> Oh, cut the Martyr crap, Bob.
>
> When you start a post with "Not at all foul mouthed one ...", then unlike
Sprint, I am going to
> fulfull your expecations.
Oh right ... who starting cussing in the prior post to that ... You did. I
haven't sunk to your extremely low level in that reply or any other for that
matter. I just posted reflecting your posting style ... which is very foul.
>
> Ad-honimens don't work on me, because I care neither about credibility, or
making freinds, or
> even being right all the time. I just want Sprint to do the right thing.
I'll discuss my
> interpretations of the law based on experience and precidents.
>
> If you wnat to fling feces at each other like a pair of rhesus monkeys,
well, I can do that to.
> Everyone blows off steam differently.
Since when was I fling feces at you? By saying you are foul mouthed? Well,
it's true isn't it? You've shown that in quite a few prior posts here.
>
> Don't want the attacks, don't initiate them. The person you attack may be
better at it than you
> are.
What attacks? For calling you foul mouthed?
>
>
> >Only losers need to revert to swearing to try to prove their
> >position ...
>
> "Losers", eh Bob?
>
> I know people that make $500,000+ per year who curse like ****ing sailors.
In public, in a newsgroup? Sorry, but in usenet, one only has to add
colorful phrases when they have nothing else to argue about ...
>
> Losers have to pompously declare other people as losers because they
disagree with their
> demeanor.
>
> I think Losers constant support a company in the face of the indefensible,
but that is the great
> thing about freedom ... everyone has their differnt definitions.
>
> So, being the loser that I am, I might as well not fight the urge to ask
you to suck ****
> through a straw.
There you go again ...
>
>
> >What's more, you've tried to combine my comments from two
> >different posts I've made which don't apply to each other.
>
> I don't think so. I think you obviously contradicted yourself. But
interpret it as you like.
Everyone knows you did. You were trying to read between the lines and
through your deluded and muddled brain , you came up with that incorrect
premise. Did you see anyone backing your side of the discussion?
>
> Asshole.
>
>
> Love and kisses,
> The un-credible Loser
On that we can agree ... totally.
Bob
Similar Threads
- Apple (iPhone)
- Chit Chat
Ask fayed hacker to your recover stolen crypto currency
in New Member Introductions