On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:24:18 -0600, Todd Allcock
<[email protected]> wrote in <[email protected]>:

>At 14 Aug 2007 21:56:45 +0000 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> A two week old story about a rumored prototype? Surely Navas is
>> getting desparate for material to post.
>
>Would you rather read why Motorola chargers are so slow again? ;-)
>
>I found it more amusing that he hit every major carrier newsgroup EXCEPT
>the attws group.

ATTWS is now part of AT&T/Cingular.

>I wonder why alt.cellular.attws is good enough for posting his bi-weekly
>FAQs and charters, but not today's "news" items?

Teaching out to lost sheep like you.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

"SMS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Todd Allcock wrote:
>> At 14 Aug 2007 21:56:45 +0000 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> A two week old story about a rumored prototype? Surely Navas is
>>> getting desparate for material to post.
>>
>>
>> Would you rather read why Motorola chargers are so slow again? ;-)
>
>
>> I found it more amusing that he hit every major carrier newsgroup EXCEPT
>> the attws group.
>
> Spammers are hard to understand!
>
>> I wonder why alt.cellular.attws is good enough for posting his bi-weekly
>> FAQs and charters, but not today's "news" items?
>
> Why would he post the Cingular charter in alt.cellular.attws? That makes
> no sense.


When has he ever made any sense ?

Todd Allcock wrote:
> At 14 Aug 2007 21:56:45 +0000 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> A two week old story about a rumored prototype? Surely Navas is
>> getting desparate for material to post.
>
>
> Would you rather read why Motorola chargers are so slow again? ;-)


> I found it more amusing that he hit every major carrier newsgroup EXCEPT
> the attws group.

Spammers are hard to understand!

> I wonder why alt.cellular.attws is good enough for posting his bi-weekly
> FAQs and charters, but not today's "news" items?

Why would he post the Cingular charter in alt.cellular.attws? That makes
no sense.

At 14 Aug 2007 21:56:45 +0000 [email protected] wrote:

> A two week old story about a rumored prototype? Surely Navas is
> getting desparate for material to post.


Would you rather read why Motorola chargers are so slow again? ;-)

I found it more amusing that he hit every major carrier newsgroup EXCEPT
the attws group.

I wonder why alt.cellular.attws is good enough for posting his bi-weekly
FAQs and charters, but not today's "news" items?


--

"I don't need my cell phone to play video games or take pictures
or double as a Walkie-Talkie; I just need it to work. Thanks for
all the bells and whistles, but I could communicate better with
ACTUAL bells and whistles." -Bill Maher 9/25/2003