reply to discussion

Post a reply to the thread: SAR confusion

Your Message

If you are already a member Click here to log in
 
  • :)
  • :heart:
  • :(
  • ;)
  • :p
  • :cool:
  • :rolleyes:
  • :ah:
  • :evil:
  • :flamemad:
  • :sad:
  • :laugh:
  • :D
  • :smart:
  • :blush:

Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces)

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

  • If selected, :) will not be replaced with smile

Subscription

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 11-07-2008, 06:43 PM
    cell333
    I have never owned a cell before and I'm planning to get one. I won't be using it a lot, just for emergency calls ect..

    So I did some look around and found that LG KG320 has the lowest.
    But just to be sure that that phone is safe, I did a bit searching and it got me confused.

    at sarsshield dot com, the reading for 1.6w/kg is 1.15, and 2.0w/kg = 0.129

    Why are there two reading and what's the difference? Is this LG KG320 really low in SAR? The reading for 1.6w/kg is what got me confused. Lower numbers means low in sar? no?

    Sorry, I couldn't post the link cause I don't have 20+ posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •