reply to discussion

Post a reply to the thread: infrared vs. bluetooth

Your Message

If you are already a member Click here to log in
 
  • :)
  • :heart:
  • :(
  • ;)
  • :p
  • :cool:
  • :rolleyes:
  • :ah:
  • :evil:
  • :flamemad:
  • :sad:
  • :laugh:
  • :D
  • :smart:
  • :blush:

Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces)

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

  • If selected, :) will not be replaced with smile

Subscription

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 02-24-2010, 12:24 PM
    Cman
    Hi, infrared is slow, can not work at distance so, not mobile. I prefere bluetooth. Just install good antivirus on yo phone to track virus.
    Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.2.13337/2548; U; en) Presto/2.2.0
  • 02-20-2010, 10:34 PM
    tynae
    I've been thinking about what is the safest way to send files. Is it through the infrared port or bluetooth? Because if I will use bluetooth, the tendency is that there will be lots of viruses which may greatly affect my mobile phone. While in infrared, though the transfer will take for quite some time, at least there will be no viruses.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •