reply to discussion

Post a reply to the thread: midi or mp3?

Your Message

If you are already a member Click here to log in
 
  • :)
  • :heart:
  • :(
  • ;)
  • :p
  • :cool:
  • :rolleyes:
  • :ah:
  • :evil:
  • :flamemad:
  • :sad:
  • :laugh:
  • :D
  • :smart:
  • :blush:

Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces)

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

  • If selected, :) will not be replaced with smile

Subscription

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 09-26-2002, 02:42 AM
    Padder
    Sure that midi & mp3 are not the same!
    there's no need to choose because not equal.
  • 09-25-2002, 12:57 PM
    djdarren
    Midi is good if you have a good pc set up. I prefer Mid because i have a recording studio facility. i advise Mpeg for beginners
  • 09-18-2002, 08:11 AM
    Ronny
    Karaoke use mp3 mostly but to use it for a band is improbable.

    You can't add a click track.
    You can't change volumes on individual tracks to allow for difference in acoustics at different venues.

    You can't bin the guitar a play it yourself.

    You can't take the ending of one song and paste it onto the ending of another to get rid of a fade out track.

    The list could go on and on.
  • 09-17-2002, 03:28 PM
    DJ Ralph E
    midi is a musicians tool!
    mp3 is just, well, for playn..

    ur right "theproducer"

    two totally diff things!~
  • 08-27-2002, 07:58 AM
    The Keeper
    But then again with midi you can hook up to a vocal harmonizer
  • 08-27-2002, 07:53 AM
    The Keeper
    From an onstage point of view, midi is the best option, you can also assign a track to a midi vocal effects unit to turn on or off the effects, a track for midi guitar so you don't need to dance on pedals. However, I find a midifile converted to an mp3 is clearer sound wise on stage, whether it be the way it is converted, I don't know. Also, you can add backing vocals to an mp3
  • 08-26-2002, 02:56 AM
    liquidbond
    i think mp3's are way better because u can actually here the person sing and stuff but wit a midi all your here is the melody of the song which is good because u can relax with the music

    but i'd still pick mp3 over midi
  • 08-25-2002, 04:05 AM
    theproducer
    strange question ---> mp3 or midi?

    those 2 are totally different and for totally different use.

    is combining them a solution? :d
  • 08-24-2002, 11:56 AM
    RedXIII
    MP3
  • 08-23-2002, 05:34 PM
    cgkb
    I've only ever used mp3's until now for listening to.
    but now I want to get into midi's. what's a good starting software for beginners to buy/use?
  • 08-14-2002, 02:55 AM
    glitter
    I think midi's are more professional to perform with than mp3's.
  • 08-12-2002, 12:44 AM
    theARTISAN
    What would you need an mp3 of a MIDI for?
    Just curious...

    You could record the MIDI in Cool Edit Pro, Soundforge, WavLab (etc etc) by playing it through your soundcard - or play from MIDI keyboard recording to your computer -
    Save as a WAV then convert to mp3 with favorite mp3 encoder (Lame, etc...)
  • 08-11-2002, 07:17 AM
    john.hankinson
    Its kind of an odd question. Its like comparing a pixel-based Bitmap image to a vector-based metafile image. They achieve different ends.

    A MIDI file is effectively a complicated form of music script, where as a MP3 is sampled digital audio. One contains instructions of how to play the tune (MIDI) and the other is the actual performance (MP3).
  • 08-10-2002, 09:44 PM
    sbouda
    I prefer Mp3. Im still trying to find an easy way to convert midi to mp3
  • 08-10-2002, 07:50 AM
    rabe
    midis are good for edit mp3 are good for listen to
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •