reply to discussion

Post a reply to the thread: Radiation Levels

Your Message

If you are already a member Click here to log in
 
  • :)
  • :heart:
  • :(
  • ;)
  • :p
  • :cool:
  • :rolleyes:
  • :ah:
  • :evil:
  • :flamemad:
  • :sad:
  • :laugh:
  • :D
  • :smart:
  • :blush:
[More]

Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces)

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

  • If selected, :) will not be replaced with smile

Subscription

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 04-10-2013, 03:11 AM
    Katerina
    ... The Swedish studies contrast with the much larger body of epidemiologic studies...
    And which one to believe?
  • 04-08-2013, 05:59 AM
    tavenger5
    Ah I see: Should The FCC Re-Examine Cell Phone Radiation? - Forbes
  • 04-08-2013, 05:51 AM
    tavenger5
    Which recent claims are you referring to? As far as I know laws regarding SAR levels has not changed.
  • 04-08-2013, 01:14 AM
    BayBay
    Does anyone know if the FCC has looked into recent claims regarding cell phone's radiation levels? Have any laws regarding the levels been created or changed?

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish